bualls23
New member
i'm new to the forum, been reading and absorbong alot, but this is my first post. i have no intention of doing a cycle anytime soon, just starting to ask some questions. i still have alot of understanding to do before considering prohormones/designers. my qestion is, besides being long; is:
If choosing between a cycle, what would be more toxic/ have increased sides/ and require a more involved pct. a 10/10/10 of m-drol, or a stack of a methyl/non-methyl like like havoc/prop being run at 20/30/30/30 and 60/60/60/60 in the same 4 weeks. is m-drol as hard on the liver in 3 weeks as havoc in 4. does a non methyl like prop with havoc have greater chance of sides, in terms of severity, and variety, than m-drol, considering that although prop is non-methyl, it is a progestin? will the havoc help with the prop sides (gyno) since it is claimed to have anti-estrogenic properties? i havn't found much info on 2 stacked mild prohormones vs. 1 seriously potent one. this may have been covered but i have yet to find the info. any opinion would be great.
i read alot of people that are doing their first cycle believing that 1 methyl with a non methyl is much safer than just 1 methyl. but even non methyls have serious implications to consider.
this can apply to any stacked cycle, being epi/furazadrol, h-drol/3-ad, take you pick of methyl/non-methyl. all being based an running a standard cycle at normal 4 week length at normal dosage, but comparing against something like m-drol, or p-plex at normal length/dosage.
i apologize for the thesis, but trying to be as accurate as possible to eliminate some variables. this is not a question about having a proper pct, i'm sure i'll ask something about that soon enough. one thing at a time!
i'm male, 29, 203lb, 10-11%bf, been lifting for 9 years, started when i was 135lb soaking wet, but the gains are starting to come slower and slower, so i think i may be looking for that extra help in 2009.
If choosing between a cycle, what would be more toxic/ have increased sides/ and require a more involved pct. a 10/10/10 of m-drol, or a stack of a methyl/non-methyl like like havoc/prop being run at 20/30/30/30 and 60/60/60/60 in the same 4 weeks. is m-drol as hard on the liver in 3 weeks as havoc in 4. does a non methyl like prop with havoc have greater chance of sides, in terms of severity, and variety, than m-drol, considering that although prop is non-methyl, it is a progestin? will the havoc help with the prop sides (gyno) since it is claimed to have anti-estrogenic properties? i havn't found much info on 2 stacked mild prohormones vs. 1 seriously potent one. this may have been covered but i have yet to find the info. any opinion would be great.
i read alot of people that are doing their first cycle believing that 1 methyl with a non methyl is much safer than just 1 methyl. but even non methyls have serious implications to consider.
this can apply to any stacked cycle, being epi/furazadrol, h-drol/3-ad, take you pick of methyl/non-methyl. all being based an running a standard cycle at normal 4 week length at normal dosage, but comparing against something like m-drol, or p-plex at normal length/dosage.
i apologize for the thesis, but trying to be as accurate as possible to eliminate some variables. this is not a question about having a proper pct, i'm sure i'll ask something about that soon enough. one thing at a time!
i'm male, 29, 203lb, 10-11%bf, been lifting for 9 years, started when i was 135lb soaking wet, but the gains are starting to come slower and slower, so i think i may be looking for that extra help in 2009.
