Which is more androgenic rating wise?
- 07-29-2008, 11:28 AM
- 07-30-2008, 09:27 AM
I think i found it on another site, or similar to it.
apparently goes like this:
07-30-2008, 12:30 PM
07-30-2008, 07:56 PM
07-31-2008, 09:05 AM
I know Miotolan is furazabol and not furazadrol, but all that i have read, realates furazabol to furazadrol. At first, i thought furazadrol was similar to winstrol, but it apparently was not correct, more to furazabol/miotolan, and what was furaguno.
Never have no matter where I look at any other boards etc found an andro/anabolic rating on xtreme tren
07-31-2008, 03:01 PM
Xtreme Tren (pre-dienolone) has an androgenic # of 10 and Furazadrol should be about the same as Furazabol only just slightly lower - as the only difference is non-methylation and an added tetrahydropyranol ether.
However despite X-Tren (dienolone) low androgenic #, it would have much stronger androgenic properties because it has a very strong relative binding affinity (RBA) for the androgen receptor.
I'd put them pretty close in the real world.
08-01-2008, 07:59 PM
androgenic # of 10??? what?
please tell me why non-methylation and (especially) an ether addition would lower androgenicity.
if a steroid has a high RBA to the AR, that will be reflected in the androgenic potency. your attempt to somehow divorce them makes no sense.
08-01-2008, 08:47 PM
08-01-2008, 08:48 PM
Another example is Masteron (62:25) and Superdrol (400:20). Same chemical only one methyl one not and they have completely different properties and ratios.
08-01-2008, 08:49 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By fame126 in forum Training ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 03-31-2010, 10:40 PM
- By mytime09 in forum Forum Suggestions and NewsReplies: 4Last Post: 06-24-2009, 03:53 PM
- By Swirv in forum SupplementsReplies: 6Last Post: 07-28-2008, 12:19 AM
- By Mar430 in forum SupplementsReplies: 5Last Post: 07-25-2007, 06:38 PM