longhorns own all
- 11-27-2005, 12:44 AM
Originally Posted by Rogue Drone
- 11-27-2005, 10:49 AM
lol i grew up down that way. my brother was actually born in college station / bryan
it sucks being away those games are so much fun
the old days with the big ass bon fires
- 11-28-2005, 11:08 AM
Originally Posted by olb33
11-28-2005, 07:35 PM
Dam RD, you oughta be a handi capper, that's a pretty damn impressive formula ! As far as Cal's defense goes, yeah they aren't the best out there, but they were all healthy for the USC game, they held tough for 3 quarters but the wheels came off in the 4th because they had been on the field all day, Cal's offense has flat out sucked against solid teams, which is uncharacteristic for a Jeff Tedford coached team. Maybe they'll find a QB next year, time to recruit some smart & athletic kid to play QB because Joe Ayoob is too inconsistant.Originally Posted by Rogue Drone
11-28-2005, 08:10 PM
I used to make good money analyzing college football, I just do it fun now, Pro Basketball is much easier and profitable for me. I don't know much about pro football, because I got in the habit of watching and analyzing college, I've never had the time to do both. College ball is where my heart is, school spirit and *****ries trump the profession.
Two critically important stats I look at on a team is the quarterback rating and turnover margin, that's an area where USC is the nation's leader, their +1.91 gives them a real edge over Texas' +0.27 and of course, both Leinart and Young are highly rated. I have'nt really stated looking at the Rose Bowl yet.
The most interesting game for me to analyze right now is GA-LSU, at this point I'm favoring Georgia's consistentcy, my stat analysis puts those two at near dead even, the LSU -2 line reflects that. Those are two teams I've watched a lot this year, stats won't make my decision for me, never does entirely anyway, unless it's a team I've never seen.
Texas is at -27.5 right now over Colorado. I think they could make that, the stat analysis says so and one might say they got a wake up call last week, but I would never bet a line that large at any time, and Texas is likely to take the starters out earlier than usual to give other players gametime and to prevent injury, they don't need to blow out Colorado to hold their BCS position. They could, but I don't think they should or will.
There's a lot of smart people out there who analyze stocks, IMO, they could make a better yearly ROI if they applied the same careful methodologies to sports betting instead.
11-28-2005, 08:48 PM
I think both SC's and Texas' D's are terrible.
I mean, the Rose Bowl might have over 100 combined points.
And SC's special teams is worse than horrible. Maurice Drew from UCLA will have a field day - but they should beat the tar out of UCLA.
And Colorodo was good. I was impressed with them when they came to the OB, but I think they've given up. So, Texas wins big - 3 TD's at least.
12-03-2005, 02:17 PM
up by 6 td's so far.
see u in pasadena
12-03-2005, 02:33 PM
12-03-2005, 05:42 PM
Gary Barnett and the Buffs get what they deserve again. I love it. Against Nebraska and Texas, the final score is 100-6. They are a dirty program that should have fired that jerk when they had the chance.
12-03-2005, 06:13 PM
Against an unranked team... what does that really say?? They had an easier schedule than SC playing agianst only 3 ranked teams. They're going to get a wake-up call in Pasadena.Originally Posted by olb33
12-04-2005, 08:46 PM
The Horns looked powerfully impressive yesterday, but who wants to bet against Pete Carroll's biggame planning and prep with a month to heal injuries?
How crazy is college football? Fresno State goes blow to blow with SC, and then gets beaten by Nevada and La Tech, damn.
For once, the BCS system got it right. Texas and Southern Cal, oh yeah.
12-04-2005, 10:18 PM
I thought SC looked much more impressive spanking a #11 or 12 ranked team (at the time of game) than Texas stomping a nobody team.
12-05-2005, 09:36 AM
I hate the Buffs mostly because I hate The People's Republic of Boulder.
12-05-2005, 09:53 PM
I really, really hate hearing that Carroll is somehow a good coach now.
He ****ing sucked ass in the NFL.
It's an inditement as to just how mediocre college football is that Carroll is considered a good coach.
That in and of itself depresses me.
12-06-2005, 01:07 PM
I'm not a USC fan, but to say a man who has won two National Cahmpionship's in two years is not a good coach is just plain ignorant. Steve Spurrier is just one example of a good college coach ,who did not make a good NFL coach. There are many other examples. As well as good NFL coaches like Bill Walsh, who do not make good College coaches.
12-08-2005, 12:42 AM
Oh no, you mentioned Bill Walsh, a man I literally worship. He kicked ass in college too bro, just have to stand up for the manOriginally Posted by AFOX
11-12-2006, 10:18 PM
pretty sure they dont anymore...i went to the k-state texas game **** ya! k-state won lol and i live in nebraska huskers all the way but still...haha texas sux
11-12-2006, 10:32 PM
I love it. Talking sh*t to a guy that's been banned.
BTW - hopefully Neb and Miami can meet up in a national title game again. We are 3-1 against you guys.
(Que the pic of the Neb. fan with the big red cowboy hat on all glum at the 2002 Rose Bowl. )
11-13-2006, 06:41 AM
i was doing a search on stuff and saw the topic title didnt pay attention to him being bannedOriginally Posted by jmh80
Similar Forum Threads
- By hamper19 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 60Last Post: 05-08-2005, 11:47 AM
- By Matthew D in forum AnabolicsReplies: 11Last Post: 11-28-2002, 01:51 AM
- By Lifeguard in forum AnabolicsReplies: 35Last Post: 11-06-2002, 09:17 PM
- By raybravo in forum AnabolicsReplies: 8Last Post: 11-05-2002, 08:24 PM
- By Matt T in forum General ChatReplies: 5Last Post: 10-15-2002, 01:59 PM