- 01-09-2005, 08:15 PM
- 01-09-2005, 08:30 PM
The outcome of that game shouldn't have been all that big of a surprise to you.
- 01-09-2005, 08:34 PM
I thought it would have been a lot closer. I honestly did think Denver had a chance. But I could just be retarded. The team did not play up to their capabilities. Methinks they need a new coach at least. *shrugs*
01-09-2005, 10:06 PM
Very true.Originally Posted by NPursuit
01-09-2005, 10:35 PM
Nobody believed Vikings have a chance against Packers
My boys wooped their asses hahahaha
01-09-2005, 11:06 PM
Denver didn't look ready. I know that's a broad-based and assumptive statement, but they just got jumped on and didn't even put up a good fight until after they were down. Tackling in the second half was abyssmal, especially in the secondary. I know the Colts are talented, but for goodness sake, anyone looks good when they're allowed to run free. I like Shanahan, but it may be time for him to go elsewhere. I don't think he'd be unemployed for long, but a change might be just the thing for the Broncos.
01-09-2005, 11:39 PM
49% of moneyline bets were on the Vikings so you theory is incorrect.Originally Posted by DmitryWI
01-10-2005, 02:32 PM
- 6'0" 265 lbs.
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Rep Power
- Lv. Percent
Damm size, you are a well informed gamblerOriginally Posted by size
I think you could help us make some $$$
01-10-2005, 03:07 PM
I was one of those 49% too But cheeseheads here in Wisconsin were pretty damn confident about Packers bhahahaha Suckers