Dwight Schrute
I am faster than 80% of all snakes
:box:
:box:
:box:
:box:
:box:
We'll see next Monday night!!! :saw: At the Linc, I may add... :drunk: :twisted:DmitryWI said:I don't care. Vikings kicked ass.:hammer: :thumbsup: And I got drunk:drunk:
sage said:eagles. vikings. they both playing for runner up in the nfc brothers. the Seeeeeahawks time has come.
Sage
oh no doubt. sweet running game philly has.jminis said:Sage your a funny guy :icon_lol:
WooHoo! Lets see if they can keep it up through the season now. Especially towards the end. I hate Moss, but Vikings is my team.DmitryWI said:I don't care. Vikings kicked ass.:hammer: :thumbsup: And I got drunk:drunk:
Bobo said:Yeah Westbrook only had 119 rushing yards on 19 carries and 42 receiving on 3 recepts until they took him because the beating was so bad.
Its awful.
Bobo said:Yeah Westbrook only had 119 rushing yards on 19 carries and 42 receiving on 3 recepts until they took him because the beating was so bad.
Its awful.
FiGMan said:That game was just a glimpse of a team that has so many new parts coming together. The fact that Donovan and T.O. have such a great chemistry already is amazing. LOOK OUT!!!
By the way I'll be at The Linc Monday night for the game. I'll be sure to check back with some great stories.
Big D said:I think it's going to be a high scoring game. If the Vikings can get buy the Eagles front four, they'll be racking up yardage and points. Think about it, the Giants fumbled in the redzone, the game was almost 31-24. The Eagles looked great on offense, but still showed weakness against the run.
PC1 said:I'm not a fan of either team, but I am looking forward to that game...............Just curious, what's your prediction for score next week?
Don't you talk **** about my boyCuffs said:WooHoo! Lets see if they can keep it up through the season now. Especially towards the end. I hate Moss, but Vikings is my team.
EEmain said:Much hype about TO and Moss! Watch out for the little guy from "Nova he will be Faulk east if he stays healthy.
weeenisss said:packers O-line...unstoppable...against supposedly the best D-line in football...carolina who???
Bobo said:Your defense tends to slack off when your dominating someone. The problem is the front four is pretty damn good now and the linebackers are fast as hell. Its their corners that are vulnerable so they scheme to protect them and that usually ends up with a soft cushion in the run game when you get past the front four.
They need to gain confidence with their corners and that just takes time. If you look at teh Giants game they didn't blitz much at all compared to past years and thats because of ther weakness at corner.
Big D said:I honestly think the Eagles only have a good front four. They signed Jeramia Trotter from Washington who ISN'T FAST and the rest of there linebackers are just solid. Let's not forget that Tiki Barber racked up great numbers and looked like he was 22 yrs old. Not to mention that the Giants have a weak offensive line. My point is that once you get by the Eagles front four, they show a weakness.
Bobo said:Trotter was bad in washington because he forced to a play a system which is not good in (nor was anyone else). Put him in Jim Johnsons scheme and he's a pro bowler like he was 3 years ago. He is an attacking linebacker, not an east to west guy. Jim Johnsone doens't rely on linebackers either and that has been evident over the past 5 years and tehy still have been one of the best in the league. They haven't been beat because of defense, they have been beat because they had no wide receivers.
The rest of their linebackers (Jones and Simoneau) are VERY fast.
Tiki barber racked up so many yards because they were playing soft zones because they were up so much. The majority of his yards were garbage yards when the game was over.
Big D said:You give them way too much credit. The Giants have Kirt Warner as a quarterback, and a weak offensive line. Kirt Warner can't throw to any receivers so who does that leave as a weapon? Only Tiki Barber. So the Eagles only have to stop Tiki Barber, and did they do it? Not very well, I think it was around 172 all purpose yds and a touchdown?
Bobo said:Did you even watch the game? It sounds like you didn't. Warner actually had a decent amount of time to throw because they did't blitz much at all. They sat back.
Doens't have anyone to throw too? Yeah, Shockey, Toomer and Hillard are all awful players.
Unbelievable...
Bobo said:Did you even watch the game? It sounds like you didn't. Warner actually had a decent amount of time to throw because they did't blitz much at all. They sat back.
Doens't have anyone to throw too? Yeah, Shockey, Toomer and Hillard are all awful players.
Unbelievable...
Bobo said:Did you even watch the game? It sounds like you didn't. Warner actually had a decent amount of time to throw because they did't blitz much at all. They sat back.
Doens't have anyone to throw too? Yeah, Shockey, Toomer and Hillard are all awful players.
Unbelievable...
Big D said:My original point was that I didn't think the Eagles defense was as good as it was due to the loss of secondary players. The Giants have weapons on offense, but if you remember that they had the same weapons last year and they also finished with a terrible record last year. And AGAIN, the Giants front line is very vunerable due to rookies. All I'm saying is that I wouldn't get all hyped up about beating the Giants. The true test for the Eagles D is coming up this Monday.
Big D said:Oh yeah, and I didn't say Kirt Warner didn't have any weapons. I said that Kirt Warner can't throw to any of them because he sucks.
Bobo said:Oh god...
I get hyped up because my team won. I also get hyped up because the giants ALWAYS play the eagles tough no matter who sucks. Dominating anyone like they did against any team in the NFL says something.
I am going to guess you are a "glass is half empty" guy...
And you are right about having the same weapons and same type of personnel last year.....and the Eagles barely beat them twice. So I would say the Eagles have improved a great deal. If you can't see that, you are Blind D, not Big D.