[b unit]

Would a taking a lie detector test be more efficient way of testing Pro's

Just a thought guys, what do you all think?

[Cellardude]

lie dectors measures reactions. If you know how it works, you can get past it. Lots of natural leagues still have people who cheat. They figure the half lifes of compounds they are illegal, they run it, and they know how to avoid making the detector go nuts. Its not impossible. It also depends on the person doing the lie detector test. I think the competence of the person and his ability to ask and guage in questions also measures the accuracy of the lie detector. Even with the best lie detector examiners im sure that its still like a 95% rate of being accurate. I think an average rate of being correct is fairly low though somewhere in the 60% range when the tester is not that well experienced.

[TripDog]

Whats the point.......everyone KNOWS they all use massive amounts of sh*t.

[Rugger]

It would be a good idea, but the tests are not impossible to beat. The test is as good as it's administrator.

[b unit]

Originally Posted by TripDog

Whats the point.......everyone KNOWS they all use massive amounts of sh*t.

Trip, it's a paradoxical statement to point out an already absurd organisation such as the IFBB and it's current drug testing policy.

[TripDog]

Originally Posted by b unit

Trip, it's a paradoxical statement to point out an already absurd organisation such as the IFBB and it's current drug testing policy.

my bad, just being me..lol.

[futurepilot]

I think they use if for some natural competitions, if you place.

[b unit]

Originally Posted by Rugger1

It would be a good idea, but the tests are not impossible to beat. The test is as good as it's administrator.

do you not think that an organisation as rich as the IFBB could not afford the best in the business at administering a polygraph test?

[b unit]

Originally Posted by TripDog

my bad, just being me..lol.

all good bro

[Screwtape]

How to beat a lie detector?
Liniment in the armpits.

[Omen]

"Lie detectors" are admissible in court, besides that, traitors in this country have passed it. In fact, a Polygraph measures your signs along with the administrator who is supposed to monitor your body language too to establish "base behavior", like base signs and see when deviations occur and observe variations and what they say, a variation isn't always lying....and vice versa.

If the IFBB will hire the best administrators, the bodybuilders will hire or explore counter intelligence personnel to debrief them on "passing the poly".

Fact is, the DEA needs bodybuilders to use drugs so they can have jobs, the market needs drugs so they can boost sales of legal "drugs and supplements" indirectly and people do wanna see muscle freaks.

All in all, the current way is working fine, not everyone is happy with it, but in the big picture, it's working out good.

[LatSpread]

sure they use polygraphs in some natural organizations but as far as I'm concerned since people will do whatever it takes to cheat drug tests all this would do is breed liars who internally justify lies as the truth.

[smeton_yea]

If anyone is that big there using steroids simple as that! You can get big without them but not freaky.

[rugger48]

Originally Posted by TripDog

Whats the point.......everyone KNOWS they all use massive amounts of sh*t.

Truthfully he has a point, why even test them. everybody is on a level playing filed. They maybe using , but all the IFBB pros are definitly on level playing feild, so why waste time testing them.