View Poll Results: Would a taking a lie detector test be more efficient way of testing Pro's

Voters
2. This poll is closed
  • Hell yes!

    0 0%
  • No way

    2 100.00%
  • Who gives a sh*t, pro bb'ing sucks balls anyway!

    0 0%

Would a taking a lie detector test be more efficient way of testing Pro's

Page 1 of 2 12 Last
  1. Would a taking a lie detector test be more efficient way of testing Pro's


    Would a taking a lie detector test be more efficient way of testing Pro's

    Just a thought guys, what do you all think?


  2. lie dectors measures reactions. If you know how it works, you can get past it. Lots of natural leagues still have people who cheat. They figure the half lifes of compounds they are illegal, they run it, and they know how to avoid making the detector go nuts. Its not impossible. It also depends on the person doing the lie detector test. I think the competence of the person and his ability to ask and guage in questions also measures the accuracy of the lie detector. Even with the best lie detector examiners im sure that its still like a 95% rate of being accurate. I think an average rate of being correct is fairly low though somewhere in the 60% range when the tester is not that well experienced.
    •   
       


  3. Whats the point.......everyone KNOWS they all use massive amounts of sh*t.
    The LORD is my rock, my fortress, and my savior; my God is my rock, in whom I find protection. He is my shield, the power that saves me, and my place of safety.-Psalm 18:2

  4. It would be a good idea, but the tests are not impossible to beat. The test is as good as it's administrator.

  5. Quote Originally Posted by TripDog View Post
    Whats the point.......everyone KNOWS they all use massive amounts of sh*t.
    Trip, it's a paradoxical statement to point out an already absurd organisation such as the IFBB and it's current drug testing policy.

    •   
       


  6. Quote Originally Posted by b unit View Post
    Trip, it's a paradoxical statement to point out an already absurd organisation such as the IFBB and it's current drug testing policy.

    my bad, just being me..lol.
    The LORD is my rock, my fortress, and my savior; my God is my rock, in whom I find protection. He is my shield, the power that saves me, and my place of safety.-Psalm 18:2

  7. I think they use if for some natural competitions, if you place.

  8. Quote Originally Posted by Rugger1 View Post
    It would be a good idea, but the tests are not impossible to beat. The test is as good as it's administrator.
    do you not think that an organisation as rich as the IFBB could not afford the best in the business at administering a polygraph test?

  9. Quote Originally Posted by TripDog View Post
    my bad, just being me..lol.
    all good bro

  10. How to beat a lie detector?
    Liniment in the armpits.

  11. "Lie detectors" are admissible in court, besides that, traitors in this country have passed it. In fact, a Polygraph measures your signs along with the administrator who is supposed to monitor your body language too to establish "base behavior", like base signs and see when deviations occur and observe variations and what they say, a variation isn't always lying....and vice versa.

    If the IFBB will hire the best administrators, the bodybuilders will hire or explore counter intelligence personnel to debrief them on "passing the poly".

    Fact is, the DEA needs bodybuilders to use drugs so they can have jobs, the market needs drugs so they can boost sales of legal "drugs and supplements" indirectly and people do wanna see muscle freaks.

    All in all, the current way is working fine, not everyone is happy with it, but in the big picture, it's working out good.

  12. sure they use polygraphs in some natural organizations but as far as I'm concerned since people will do whatever it takes to cheat drug tests all this would do is breed liars who internally justify lies as the truth.

  13. If anyone is that big there using steroids simple as that! You can get big without them but not freaky.
    Facebook John Smeton Fitness
    youtube JohnSmetonFitness1
    Twitter SmetonFitness

  14. Quote Originally Posted by TripDog View Post
    Whats the point.......everyone KNOWS they all use massive amounts of sh*t.

    Truthfully he has a point, why even test them. everybody is on a level playing filed. They maybe using , but all the IFBB pros are definitly on level playing feild, so why waste time testing them.

  15. Quote Originally Posted by Omen View Post
    Fact is, the DEA needs bodybuilders to use drugs so they can have jobs
    LMAO! This statement is a self evident contradiction, it shows there's obviously enough crack floating around to keep the DEA busy enough.... I'm sure the DEA has plenty to do with all the coke and MJ coming through from south america, most of the world's opium via afghanistan, etc...

  16. Have those of you who are saying how easy it is to pass a poly ever taken one? A polygraph is NOT an easily passed process regardless of what you've read on wikipedia.

  17. Quote Originally Posted by Jayhawkk View Post
    Have those of you who are saying how easy it is to pass a poly ever taken one? A polygraph is NOT an easily passed process regardless of what you've read on wikipedia.
    but but, I thought wikipedia always had factual information...

  18. yea, peopel like to think its easy no chance.

    The testing the IFBB is NOT for steroids, its just not spoken about what the testing is.
    They have anti-"doping" testing ....i.e. heroin, weed, cocaine....etc etc....

    They know the guys use the juice and if you look at any info ever released on the "testing" they do...its either "random" which means they prolly ask the athlete if they can use the name OR it is done on all of them which would be the previosu mentioned.

    No one is so naieve to think they dont juice...if they do, they need to come out fomr under the rock they live under and experience the world.

  19. Quote Originally Posted by MentalTwitch View Post
    No one is so naieve to think they dont juice...if they do, they need to come out fomr under the rock they live under and experience the world.
    I dunno, plenty of grown men 35+ who have been watching WWF/WWE/WWhatever-the-hell it's called these days since the early hulk hogan days who refuse to consider the fact that it's rather blatantly choreographed, so I would think there's just as many out there that think only a minority of pro BBers are on the juice. Personally I wish a real effort to stop pro juicing would
    someday happen, the athletes are so big and bloated now they're become living cartoons. When I was little there was only one guy who used drugs to get huge, and like the GH using BBers of today, he too ended up with an awful looking bloated gut, but it was ok because he was afterall, just a cartoon.

  20. Quote Originally Posted by Screwtape View Post
    How to beat a lie detector?
    Liniment in the armpits.
    whats liniment?

  21. Taking away steroids fomr BB's is like taking the ball away from a basketball player....it leaves the game pointless.

  22. ever seen the show on MTV where the guys friend is in his ear and has a lie dectector test set up and can tell if the girl/guy is lying?
    Facebook John Smeton Fitness
    youtube JohnSmetonFitness1
    Twitter SmetonFitness

  23. Quote Originally Posted by Jayhawkk View Post
    Have those of you who are saying how easy it is to pass a poly ever taken one? A polygraph is NOT an easily passed process regardless of what you've read on wikipedia.
    maybe it's easy in the movies however i think that it really wouldn't be that easy to fool an expert tester and top of the ranger polygraph machine.

    and anyway this thread was a paradoxical statement to point out an already absurd organisation such as the IFBB, it's current drug testing policy and just the general B.S that's feed to the BB'ing fans and consumers of BB realted products that use top pro's to endorse as what was their "edge" in winning a title.

  24. Lie detectors are crap. I read this and practiced this. I beat the lie detector. It is a free 220 page e book. Enjoy reading. You're welcome.

    https://antipolygraph.org/pubs.shtml

    maybe it's easy in the movies however i think that it really wouldn't be that easy to fool an expert tester and top of the ranger polygraph machine.
    No...It's actually pretty easy. Did it, lived to tell about it.

  25. Doesn' work... Polys aren't 100% but beating it is usually based on the type you're taking.

  26. Quote Originally Posted by smeton_yea View Post
    ever seen the show on MTV where the guys friend is in his ear and has a lie dectector test set up and can tell if the girl/guy is lying?
    That's called voice stress analysis, and i won't even get into how pointless those are.

    This describes it better than I can, I don't want to re-invent the wheel to explain it;

    Quote Originally Posted by wikipedia
    VSA is based on the subsonic components of human voice not audible to observers, now known as the Lippold Tremor. In 1957, Olaf Lippold discovered this physiological tremor in the human voice in the 8-12 Hz range.[10] Lippold, Redfearn and Vuco began exploring the correlation between muscle activity and stress, and found that when the fight or flight response presents in a person, one of the psycho-physiological responses that manifest, is the involuntary tensing of the 'soft' striated muscles, particularly, the laryngeal muscles. Under normal circumstances, the laryngeal muscle is relaxed, producing recorded voice at approximately 12Hz. Under stress however, the tensed laryngeal muscle produces voice significantly lower in pitch.

  27. Quote Originally Posted by Jayhawkk View Post
    Doesn' work... Polys aren't 100% but beating it is usually based on the type you're taking.
    Very true. The type is important.

    I shouldn't have said it was easy, because my stomach was in knots the whole time. The most important thing during the Poly I did, was to give the examiner a little info of my past but not enough to hang myself. Just remember, they don't expect anyone to be a Saint.

    I knew the questions and the way they would be asked from that book. It was textbook. From the examiner trying to befriend me, to showing me who was in charge. I was chuckling inside.

    Hey, I read about that trick!

  28. Quote Originally Posted by Mach .78 View Post
    Lie detectors are crap. I read this and practiced this. I beat the lie detector. It is a free 220 page e book. Enjoy reading. You're welcome.

    https://antipolygraph.org/pubs.shtml
    maybe you could go earn some easy money if you're that good at beating it bro.

    Fox's - The Moment of Truth






  29. No thanks. I'm good. Once is enough. The experience was much weirder than that show. The person asking me the questions was nice but kinda strange. They start off by telling you that they want to see you do well. Maybe they do, but don't let down your guard until after the test, after you have left the building.

    They asked me if I had read anything about beating the polygraph.

    Nope.

    Arm yourself with knowledge people so you aren't taken advantage of.

    Google "Zeitgeist" for an interesting movie of how people attempt to control people. The polygragh is a tool of fear, which is very effective in most instances of making you fear yourself. I'll post the movie in the General Chat section.

  30. Of course it's a tool of fear... What else has you admitting to crap you were never caught doing? Your criminal record may be spotless but you could very well have some serious issues.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Easy way of testing your test?
    By tbinnerarity in forum Old School Hormone Use
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-01-2010, 01:10 AM
  2. Most Efficient Exercises (EMG Testing)
    By Future in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-12-2009, 07:32 PM
  3. testing and Methyl-1 test
    By swole79 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 04:58 PM
  4. Sherk passes lie detector test
    By CNorris in forum MMA
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-06-2007, 05:09 PM
  5. Testing Test
    By macattack in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-20-2003, 03:38 PM
Log in
Log in