Would a taking a lie detector test be more efficient way of testing Pro's
Just a thought guys, what do you all think?
Just a thought guys, what do you all think?
Trip, it's a paradoxical statement to point out an already absurd organisation such as the IFBB and it's current drug testing policy.Whats the point.......everyone KNOWS they all use massive amounts of sh*t.
my bad, just being me..lol.Trip, it's a paradoxical statement to point out an already absurd organisation such as the IFBB and it's current drug testing policy.
:thumbsup:
do you not think that an organisation as rich as the IFBB could not afford the best in the business at administering a polygraph test?It would be a good idea, but the tests are not impossible to beat. The test is as good as it's administrator.
all good bro :thumbsup:my bad, just being me..lol.
Whats the point.......everyone KNOWS they all use massive amounts of sh*t.
LMAO! This statement is a self evident contradiction, it shows there's obviously enough crack floating around to keep the DEA busy enough.... I'm sure the DEA has plenty to do with all the coke and MJ coming through from south america, most of the world's opium via afghanistan, etc...Fact is, the DEA needs bodybuilders to use drugs so they can have jobs
but but, I thought wikipedia always had factual information...Have those of you who are saying how easy it is to pass a poly ever taken one? A polygraph is NOT an easily passed process regardless of what you've read on wikipedia.
I dunno, plenty of grown men 35+ who have been watching WWF/WWE/WWhatever-the-hell it's called these days since the early hulk hogan days who refuse to consider the fact that it's rather blatantly choreographed, so I would think there's just as many out there that think only a minority of pro BBers are on the juice. Personally I wish a real effort to stop pro juicing wouldNo one is so naieve to think they dont juice...if they do, they need to come out fomr under the rock they live under and experience the world.
whats liniment?How to beat a lie detector?
Liniment in the armpits.
maybe it's easy in the movies however i think that it really wouldn't be that easy to fool an expert tester and top of the ranger polygraph machine.Have those of you who are saying how easy it is to pass a poly ever taken one? A polygraph is NOT an easily passed process regardless of what you've read on wikipedia.
No...It's actually pretty easy. Did it, lived to tell about it.maybe it's easy in the movies however i think that it really wouldn't be that easy to fool an expert tester and top of the ranger polygraph machine.
That's called voice stress analysis, and i won't even get into how pointless those are.ever seen the show on MTV where the guys friend is in his ear and has a lie dectector test set up and can tell if the girl/guy is lying?
VSA is based on the subsonic components of human voice not audible to observers, now known as the Lippold Tremor. In 1957, Olaf Lippold discovered this physiological tremor in the human voice in the 8-12 Hz range.[10] Lippold, Redfearn and Vuco began exploring the correlation between muscle activity and stress, and found that when the fight or flight response presents in a person, one of the psycho-physiological responses that manifest, is the involuntary tensing of the 'soft' striated muscles, particularly, the laryngeal muscles. Under normal circumstances, the laryngeal muscle is relaxed, producing recorded voice at approximately 12Hz. Under stress however, the tensed laryngeal muscle produces voice significantly lower in pitch.
Very true. The type is important.Doesn' work... Polys aren't 100% but beating it is usually based on the type you're taking.
maybe you could go earn some easy money if you're that good at beating it bro.Lie detectors are crap. I read this and practiced this. I beat the lie detector. It is a free 220 page e book. Enjoy reading. You're welcome.
https://antipolygraph.org/pubs.shtml
You also have to realize many of the leaders made so many mistakes thats how that got into that positionEveryone i've met who has done a complete background poly feels dirty and like a criminal after completing one. There's a lot of things we just put behind us and until it's reminded what we may have done, do we remember. I'm all for polys for people in positions of power and influence that can lead to corruption.
Mistakes don't get you, breaking laws you weren't caught by, will. Think along the lines of incest, rape, grand larceny, etc etc.You also have to realize many of the leaders made so many mistakes thats how that got into that position
I put it the wrong way.LMAO! This statement is a self evident contradiction, it shows there's obviously enough crack floating around to keep the DEA busy enough.... I'm sure the DEA has plenty to do with all the coke and MJ coming through from south america, most of the world's opium via afghanistan, etc...
Of course I all the former things I consider downright need to be locked up and or some kind of punishmentMistakes don't get you, breaking laws you weren't caught by, will. Think along the lines of incest, rape, grand larceny, etc etc.
Getting into some fights or taking pens from your office isn't a real concern.
This couldn't be further from the truth. Polygraphs are NOT admissable in court under any circumstances."Lie detectors" are admissible in court,
No theyre not 100%. Fight or flight can be controlled. Not easily, butit CAN be done.Doesn' work... Polys aren't 100% but beating it is usually based on the type you're taking.
I've taken 3 that were administered at 3 different times in my life by "supposed" specialist and I've passed 2 of them with no problem. I've had to help administer two myself, and have seen one guy pass it but he was lying, never proven, but he confessed about 1 year later to a rape case.(edit: to info leading to his conviction of a rape case)Doesn' work... Polys aren't 100% but beating it is usually based on the type you're taking.
I could have sworn that they are admissible if and only if both parties agree to it (which would be highly unlikely if the defendant knows they did it...).This couldn't be further from the truth. Polygraphs are NOT admissable in court under any circumstances.
I was trained never admissible. The state can't mention that they even asked them to take a polygraph.I could have sworn that they are admissible if and only if both parties agree to it (which would be highly unlikely if the defendant knows they did it...).
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Back after awhile: what are y’all taking? | Supplements | 11 | ||
Something I’m taking isn’t what it says it is… | Supplements | 14 | ||
Do you have any idea of what supplements do Hollywood celebrities are taking? | Supplements | 8 | ||
Taking Raloxifene but.... | Anabolics | 18 | ||
I am not taking anymore clients for 1 week | Training Forum | 4 |