View Poll Results: Would a taking a lie detector test be more efficient way of testing Pro's

Voters
2. This poll is closed
  • Hell yes!

    0 0%
  • No way

    2 100.00%
  • Who gives a sh*t, pro bb'ing sucks balls anyway!

    0 0%

Would a taking a lie detector test be more efficient way of testing Pro's

Page 2 of 2 First 12

  1. I'm not aware of Rangers taking anti-poly training. I could see that as a Delta thing, imo.


  2. Quote Originally Posted by Jayhawkk View Post
    Doesn' work... Polys aren't 100% but beating it is usually based on the type you're taking.
    I've taken 3 that were administered at 3 different times in my life by "supposed" specialist and I've passed 2 of them with no problem. I've had to help administer two myself, and have seen one guy pass it but he was lying, never proven, but he confessed about 1 year later to a rape case.(edit: to info leading to his conviction of a rape case)

    Also, to add to this topic, it depends on what your being tested to detect lying for and state of mind.

    If you have convinced yourself of something then the chances of detection are low. I can be a freaking psychotic baboon, and if i've convinced myself that I did not murder someone, then in my mind's reality, it's true that i didn't, if in my twisted mind I have convinced myself that i did not...

    But, that's on the case of someone not sane, so..

    It's like someone that is tripping on acid thinking that they can fly, if you ask them during a poly test if they can fly, they will say yes and the chances of detection for a lie is then again, low...

    To answer my opinion on the topic...not really due to the fact that I can't see the point in it.
    ---The internet is the father of the electronic lynch-mob---

  3. Quote Originally Posted by RobInKuwait View Post
    This couldn't be further from the truth. Polygraphs are NOT admissable in court under any circumstances.
    I could have sworn that they are admissible if and only if both parties agree to it (which would be highly unlikely if the defendant knows they did it...).
    •   
       


  4. Quote Originally Posted by ecu19 View Post
    I could have sworn that they are admissible if and only if both parties agree to it (which would be highly unlikely if the defendant knows they did it...).
    I was trained never admissible. The state can't mention that they even asked them to take a polygraph.

    However, that may be true if about if the prosecution and defense agree. I can't see that ever happening. You would have to have a retarded defense attorney to have him support admitting anything that would helpful to the prosecution's case.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Easy way of testing your test?
    By tbinnerarity in forum Old School Hormone Use
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-01-2010, 01:10 AM
  2. Most Efficient Exercises (EMG Testing)
    By Future in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-12-2009, 07:32 PM
  3. testing and Methyl-1 test
    By swole79 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 04:58 PM
  4. Sherk passes lie detector test
    By CNorris in forum MMA
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-06-2007, 05:09 PM
  5. Testing Test
    By macattack in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-20-2003, 03:38 PM
Log in
Log in