Yup. This is the answer. Somatotyping is what the mainstream magazines like Muscle & Fitness, MuscleMag, etc., used to feed the gullible public (which included myself for a time) to explain why despite working out, eating right and taking all the supplements that were advertised in their pages, you weren't looking like the guys featured in the ads and articles. Are their genetic differences in body types? Of course. However, they are not determinative of whether you can look like a freak. The right amount of test, tren, GH and diuretics will get you there, even if you're a lowly endo.
And I would argue that he is a physical specimen over a super freak. Granted he is a beast!!!! Im glad the sport of body building is going back to physically proportionate vs raw bulk. This makes for a true competition.
With Phil as mr Olympia I def see the sport headn back to it's routes but with mass Phil Heath is an optimal "physical specimen"
If Shawn Ray would have beat Yates in 93 this whole mass monster generation would have never came to existence which is so crazy!!! A.S is one amazing competitor no argument there but his upper body was so far superior to his lower body
Agreed, most of my training style has come from him. Over the last 4 months and it has totally changed my physique let alone the "chemicals of today"
