+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 43

This Doesn't Make sense ! Arnold and Lou vs...

  1.  11-19-2010  01:28 PM
    Banned Markusrulezzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Stats
    6'3"  217 lbs.
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    672
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    This Doesn't Make sense ! Arnold and Lou vs...


    I never got my answer to questions like these

    There was NO PCT back then ! How did they get their natural Test back ? If you run a cycle without pct, ur EFFED !

    Also Arnold and Lou have kids, THEY HAVE KIDS lol !


    Don't say it's genetics, there were lots of huge guys back in the day that took roid without PCT



  2.  11-19-2010  05:43 PM
    Registered User BrockR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Stats
    6'3"  229 lbs.
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    35
    Posts
    131
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    107

    A very good question...I've been wondering the same thing!

    I mean, look at all the experiments they did with steroids back in the early days. Pumping people full of the stuff. Even the olympic teams and military. Yeah, there were some serious cases, but for the most part, that I read, many of the people recovered quite normally. PCT was non-existent.

    ETA: Not to imply that I think PCT protocols are unnecessary. I'm just intrigued by the history of how things were done then.

    •   


        
       

  3.  11-19-2010  09:50 PM
    Registered User chocolatemilk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Stats
    5'9"  207 lbs.
    Posts
    3,812
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    9962

    Well you guys have to remember the body is an amazing machine with capability to heal itself from all types of damage.

    People simply relied on their body to heal itself and it normally does. If you don't run a SERM, more times than not you will be just fine (if you're running moderate normal cycles).

    Just takes longer to reach homeostasis and the body isn't too efficient at it. It will shoot up estrogen high and then level it down in time. A SERM is recommended during this time. and nobody depends on the body to heal itself alone nowadays with better compounds that aid in the process.

  4.  11-20-2010  06:48 AM
    Idiot Savant prld2gr8ns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Stats
    5'9"  190 lbs.
    Location
    Between Middle Earth and Narnia
    Age
    32
    Posts
    10,539
    Reviews
    Read 12 Reviews
    Rep Power
    61217

    The average cycle was no where near what today's pros subject themselves too. I'm sure that went a long way it aiding with recovery and muscle loss when Arny and Hulk when off their cycle.
    ~ Nothing can kill the Grimace!!



  5.  11-20-2010  07:02 AM
    Never enough EasyEJL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Age
    45
    Posts
    31,735
    Reviews
    Read 1 Reviews
    Rep Power
    548515

    in medical studies even after having been on anabolics for years, something like 80% of people reach 80% or higher of their original levels within 6 months after stopping anabolics.
    BioCor Nutrition - Please check our line by clicking on the product below.
    Agmatine- Cor CLA Caps- Citrulline Malate - Green Tea Caps- Cissus- Creatine Mono - DivaMax

  6.  11-20-2010  11:48 AM
    Registered User BigBlackGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Stats
    5'11"  228 lbs.
    Posts
    3,582
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    14507

    The more hyped up side effects are, the more likely you are to buy the supplements and chems that are required to negate them. All in all, for the 6 week cycles guys usually do with DS/PH, the PCT is only as important as the length of time in which they will then be off cycle.

  7.  11-20-2010  01:30 PM
    Registered User bashman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Stats
    5'11"  179 lbs.
    Posts
    1,216
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1483

    I thought most of them pulsed back then. Might be the reason why

  8.  11-21-2010  03:22 AM
    Banned Markusrulezzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Stats
    6'3"  217 lbs.
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    672
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    I heard Arnold did 100mg Dbol !! Is that true or what ? Also, his test e max was 500mg a week

  9.  11-21-2010  09:11 PM
    Registered User kingdong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Stats
    5'7"  240 lbs.
    Posts
    2,851
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1903

    I suspect that those guys were more intense than todays BB's. You never heard Ferigno(spelling?) say things like, "This year Im going light and focusing more on shape and definition." Jay Cutler used to say stuff like that a lot.

  10.  11-22-2010  06:26 AM
    Registered User DaRooster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Stats
    5'11"  233 lbs.
    Location
    USA
    Age
    40
    Posts
    14
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    134

    Originally Posted by Markusrulezzz View Post
    I never got my answer to questions like these

    There was NO PCT back then ! How did they get their natural Test back ? If you run a cycle without pct, ur EFFED !

    Also Arnold and Lou have kids, THEY HAVE KIDS lol !


    Don't say it's genetics, there were lots of huge guys back in the day that took roid without PCT
    How do you know there was no PCT back then ?
    Here is another example of some young kid on the net who thinks all these drugs where discovered in the last 10 years.
    First what do you take for your PCT?

    99% of everything you take has been around longer than you have... most likely.
    So if these drugs where around back in the 70's which they where...then that means the drugs where being used for and by Doctors...and most of those guys back then went to the Doctor regularly...Where do you think the idea and way to use drugs for PCT came from? Doctors....
    The second thing you mentioned is you "HAVE TO" use a PCT or your f**ked, statement that you made....WRONG again my simple minded friend.

  11.  11-22-2010  09:40 AM
    Registered User kingdong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Stats
    5'7"  240 lbs.
    Posts
    2,851
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1903

    HCG has been around forever hasn't it?

  12.  11-22-2010  04:40 PM
    Registered User imjuschillin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Stats
    5'9"  175 lbs.
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    37
    Posts
    142
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    118

    This thread reminds me of a story from a guy here at work.

    About a year ago when I started getting into researching these compounds I got chatting with a guy here. Real good guy, funny as Hell! A guy's guy type, you know? Anyway, he's like maybe 20 yrs older than me (so 55 ish.) and I asked him if he ever used. (We were talking about gym, which he used to be right into...)

    He admitted to doing 2 cycles in the past. D-Bol and Winnie. This woulda been late 70's, early 80's he did them. I believe he said both the same year, one oral, then injectable. He didnt tell me dosagaes but he did tell me this.

    He bought them at his gym, they openly discussed and used them, and they injected them right in the changeroom! He said that year his bench went up 100lbs! No ****! 300lbs to 400lbs.

    So, my point? : After we yapped about it I asked him, I said "What did you take for PCT?"

    His reply, and I QUOTE!

    "What's PCT??"

    I dunno what that says about the state of it today. Maybe they were 'cleaner' back then, maybe the doses were way lower. Maybe just the mindset of not thinking you needed one actually lent to not needing one (Meaning, if we always hear now we need one and someone doesn't take one, they will mentally kinda direct themselves to sides, real or not?) Far as I know he didnt ramp up and/or down either, just one dose the whole time, then off...

    I asked about side effects, the only one he mentioned was a bit of an increased temper.

  13.  11-22-2010  08:23 PM
    Registered User schwellington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Stats
    6'0"  235 lbs.
    Posts
    4,833
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    8924

    Clomiphene and hcg i do not think where around in arnolds time if im correct they came out in the 80's early 90's
    Test e/dbol/epi/winnie
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/164764-schwellington-has-been.html

  14.  11-22-2010  08:31 PM
    Registered User kingdong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Stats
    5'7"  240 lbs.
    Posts
    2,851
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1903

    I think that old bodybuilders might have had a certain mental toughness where they could push themselve at a level that would at least maintain most strength. Lifting heavy actually helps boost natural test, so maby that was part of their PCT.

  15.  11-23-2010  12:48 PM
    Board Supporter wastedwhiteboy2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Stats
    6'0"  195 lbs.
    Location
    USA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,964
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    2984

    Lots of them stay "on" for years. Some ramped up and then down with the short half life anabolics. Some were just miserable during pct.

  16.  11-24-2010  06:42 AM
    Registered User sethroberts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    40
    Posts
    863
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    589

    it is actually very simple. They used lower doses, they pyramided up and tapered down and in a lot of cases they did one cycle per year. Aromatase inhibitors were not around back then. Nolva was but people didn't start using it until the eighties. Higher doses lead to more severe side effects and harsher suppression of natural hormone levels. Noone wants to here this because it is easier to think that higher doses equal more gains. What it really takes is more time and most people too impatient.

  17.  11-24-2010  08:30 AM
    Registered User BrockR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Stats
    6'3"  229 lbs.
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    35
    Posts
    131
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    107

    Originally Posted by sethroberts View Post
    it is actually very simple. They used lower doses, they pyramided up and tapered down and in a lot of cases they did one cycle per year. Aromatase inhibitors were not around back then. Nolva was but people didn't start using it until the eighties. Higher doses lead to more severe side effects and harsher suppression of natural hormone levels. Noone wants to here this because it is easier to think that higher doses equal more gains. What it really takes is more time and most people too impatient.

    Out of everything that's been mentioned on this thread so far, that statement truly does make sense.

    I venture to guess their cycles may have been quite lengthy then.

  18.  11-24-2010  05:32 PM
    Registered User kingdong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Stats
    5'7"  240 lbs.
    Posts
    2,851
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1903

    Supposedly Arnold would do a three month cycle every year and that was it.



    More roids will equal more gains, but also more sides. Today's BB's are ****ed. I am pretty confident that they will die young with the dosages they take. Hell, even PCT puts your body through a period where estrogen is to low, which is also unhealthy.

  19.  11-25-2010  07:17 PM
    Registered User John Smeton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Stats
    6'2"  225 lbs.
    Age
    32
    Posts
    10,052
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    33561

    Originally Posted by sethroberts View Post
    it is actually very simple. They used lower doses, they pyramided up and tapered down and in a lot of cases they did one cycle per year. Aromatase inhibitors were not around back then. Nolva was but people didn't start using it until the eighties. Higher doses lead to more severe side effects and harsher suppression of natural hormone levels. Noone wants to here this because it is easier to think that higher doses equal more gains. What it really takes is more time and most people too impatient.
    very true.

    Yeah I heard Arnold only used like 10-15 mgs dbol once a year and at the most two times. He did use it was pre-contest when most of his photos were all taken close to the competition. Arnold was supposed to gain a little extra bodyfat(not too much) after the show. I truly believe he did much lower doses and that just goes to show you that less and moderate doses may be best.

    Look at some of the naturals now a days they are pretty impressive

  20.  11-25-2010  10:23 PM
    Registered User kingdong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Stats
    5'7"  240 lbs.
    Posts
    2,851
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    1903

    Originally Posted by John Smeton View Post
    very true.

    Yeah I heard Arnold only used like 10-15 mgs dbol once a year and at the most two times. He did use it was pre-contest when most of his photos were all taken close to the competition. Arnold was supposed to gain a little extra bodyfat(not too much) after the show. I truly believe he did much lower doses and that just goes to show you that less and moderate doses may be best.

    Look at some of the naturals now a days they are pretty impressive
    not to much? I thought his off season stats were like 50 lbs heavier.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Does this make sense?
    By Gutterpump in forum Male Anti-Aging Medicine
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-23-2009, 09:08 PM
  2. Does this make sense?
    By glennwethere in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-11-2009, 05:17 PM
  3. Does this make sense to anyone?
    By thomastobird in forum Male Anti-Aging Medicine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-02-2007, 10:10 PM
  4. Does this make any sense?
    By CryingEmo in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-16-2007, 12:09 PM
  5. Does this make sense?
    By Emiran in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 02:19 PM