I do prefer the classic look of Arnold too but def Coleman in both. Jay looks great but compared to those shots of Coleman he doesnt look nearly as dry. Plus Coleman has those round muscle bellies makes him look cartoonish for sure.
I have always been a fan of Jay, due to his personality and his movitation/drive.
Ronnie however wins this one. He was a beast back then. I saw him at the 09 Olympia, and he still is a beast, only with a little more gut.
By gut do you mean fat, or GH gut?
Applied Nutriceuticals Representative
FACEBOOK FAN PAGE: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Applie...ls/64122223218
I like those back shots (slight homo).
Product Educator | USPowders
Statements made by this online persona are the sole property of the owner, and do not necessarily reflect USPowders’ opinion as a whole.
Ronnie is defiantly bigger then Jay. but they are both great champs.
i think cutler has ronnie, i think cutler had everyone on 2009
ronnies chest looks nasty like he works on it too much
jay muscles are cut in perfect yet dont look like they have been beat to death
in health and fitness i believe you should look fuller in comps like this
wich is why i believe that the older body builders look better like arnold and ferigno ( or however you spell it )
lol take the weider approach
oh yeah and ronnies abs stand nooo chance in comparison
Coleman takes the front most prominently in the abs & quads. He has better detail & separation in the quads then Jay. Jay has a bigger chest, but Ronnie's is dryer and more striated.
Back shot goes to Ronnie by means of glutes. Their backs are give & take differences, but Ronnie's glutes are remarkably more pronounced in size & striation then Jay's.
I didn't look hard enough at hams & calves, but judges love striated glutes (for whatever reason).
NSCA - CSCS