LV products - Sort of disappointed :o( - AnabolicMinds.com

LV products - Sort of disappointed :o(

  1. Elite Member
    Whacked's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,463
    Rep Power
    481974

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    LV products - Sort of disappointed :o(


    Disclaimer: I am a HUGE fan of PPP products

    That said: As excited as I was to see PP begin to launch a line of LV-technology-based products, I am very disappointed to see recent releases of LV products (SD+Turinabol for example) are methylated!

    WHY? I thought the entire fundamental principle of LV and equal appeal for the user was superior ORAL bioavailibility while avoiding the need for TOXIC methylated 17-aa versions.

    I look forward to your response
    Thanks PP

  2. Advanced Member
    bulldogz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    39
    Posts
    954
    Rep Power
    559

    Reputation

    I don't think that the reason behind LV technology was to avoid liver toxicity...they produced products that the general public (meaning on these open forums) wanted...and why not produce something that was requested seeing it as in a business stand point of view as long as the products are legal to sell?
  3. Senior Member
    monstermash's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  234 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,990
    Rep Power
    19725

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Whacked View Post
    Disclaimer: I am a HUGE fan of PPP products

    That said: As excited as I was to see PP begin to launch a line of LV-technology-based products, I am very disappointed to see recent releases of LV products (SD+Turinabol for example) are methylated!

    WHY? I thought the entire fundamental principle of LV and equal appeal for the user was superior ORAL bioavailibility while avoiding the need for TOXIC methylated 17-aa versions.

    I look forward to your response
    Thanks PP
    It allows for dosing flexibility ( having them in liquid form) which a ton of people wanted.

    they have a product suggestion thread at PP's home site. You can suggest products YOU think would make good LV products there.
    •   
       

  4. Elite Member
    fightbackhxc's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7,393
    Rep Power
    791062

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    well regardless of methylation it still helps with absorption...even tho a product is methylated doesnt mean your getting the full potential out of the compound....maybe im wrong here???
    Serious Nutrition Solutions | Online Representative
    Growth Factor XT-GROW! Need Cycle Support? Check out Liver XT.
    Follow SNS on Facebook for more promos!
  5. Senior Member
    panther77's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  197 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,330
    Rep Power
    744

    Reputation

    if they weren't methylated they'd act completely different in the body... granted i wouldn't mind having an oral version of masteron lol
  6. Advanced Member
    Mikey851's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Age
    29
    Posts
    587
    Rep Power
    363

    Reputation

    They have formestane LV and they said that Fura LV is a possibility so that would give you a few more options.
  7. UKStrength
    Guest
    UKStrength's Avatar

    I agree with everyone above, the LV technology was specifically designed to improve bioavailability, so that trainees could be confident that they were getting an exact dosage of the compound ingested.

    From a hepatotoxicity standpoint, no we couldn't necessarily make certain compounds less toxic due to methylation, but the LV technology allows you to dose certain compounds lower (e.g. SD) therefore reducing the liver toxicity overall.

    I think you should also post in the suggestion thread too, it would be great to have your feedback.
  8. UKStrength
    Guest
    UKStrength's Avatar

    I agree with everyone above, the LV technology was specifically designed to improve bioavailability, so that trainees could be confident that they were getting an exact dosage of the compound ingested.

    From a hepatotoxicity standpoint, no we couldn't necessarily make certain compounds less toxic due to methylation, but the LV technology allows you to dose certain compounds lower (e.g. SD) therefore reducing the liver toxicity overall.

    I think you should also post in the suggestion thread too, it would be great to have your feedback.
  9. Elite Member
    suncloud's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  201 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,352
    Rep Power
    3260

    Reputation

    i think a non-methyl version of superdrol couldn't be absorbed orally (since the liver would destroy it), so it would have to be dosed rectally. i'd hate to see the "logs".

    man, i've been waiting to use that pun.
  10. Senior Member
    panther77's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  197 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,330
    Rep Power
    744

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by suncloud View Post
    i think a non-methyl version of superdrol couldn't be absorbed orally (since the liver would destroy it), so it would have to be dosed rectally. i'd hate to see the "logs".

    man, i've been waiting to use that pun.
    Yeah, I know what you mean, that doesn't mean I can't dream of a world where steroids aren't destroyed in the liver haha one shot of test would last you basically until it expired in your blood in my world... and suppression would be no problem
  11. n87
    n87 is offline
    New Member
    n87's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  185 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    403
    Rep Power
    12916

    Reputation

    Rectally, huh... That would require a different dropper.
  12. Advanced Member
    bulldogz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    39
    Posts
    954
    Rep Power
    559

    Reputation

    SD Suppositories...!!!
  13. Primordial Performance Rep
    Jimbo15's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    30
    Posts
    810
    Rep Power
    493

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by n87 View Post
    Rectally, huh... That would require a different dropper.
    LOL. Just use the LV with a turkey baster. Let me know what kinda gains you get.
  14. Board Sponsor
    Grambo's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  188 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,807
    Rep Power
    957091

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by suncloud View Post
    i think a non-methyl version of superdrol couldn't be absorbed orally (since the liver would destroy it), so it would have to be dosed rectally. i'd hate to see the "logs".

    man, i've been waiting to use that pun.
    It would also be completely illegal haha
  15. Senior Member
    Liftingstud's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,079
    Rep Power
    1183

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by fightbackhxc View Post
    well regardless of methylation it still helps with absorption...even tho a product is methylated doesnt mean your getting the full potential out of the compound....maybe im wrong here???
    I agree totally here. The methylation allows the aas to pass through the liver. It still has to be absorbed once ingested. This is why I don't understand why people suggest u don't need to take methyl aas with fats. Fat hepls the absorption of any hormone. This is why LV tech is still helpful even with methyl aas.
  16. BBB
    BBB is offline
    Senior Member
    BBB's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  192 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,867
    Rep Power
    321364

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogz View Post
    I don't think that the reason behind LV technology was to avoid liver toxicity...they produced products that the general public (meaning on these open forums) wanted...and why not produce something that was requested seeing it as in a business stand point of view as long as the products are legal to sell?
    Although this may be what people want continued production of PH's will eventully give the feds all the fuel they need to regulate the industry. Companies should be focusing on making effective and safe natural supplements. If the industry won't self regulate the government will.
  17. Advanced Member
    bulldogz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    39
    Posts
    954
    Rep Power
    559

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by BBB View Post
    Although this may be what people want continued production of PH's will eventully give the feds all the fuel they need to regulate the industry. Companies should be focusing on making effective and safe natural supplements. If the industry won't self regulate the government will.
    The government does regulate and they will eventually, but until then...PP produces products which are not illegal or banned, plus they preach on how to do proper pct after each cycle.

    So basically they say, we will make "x product" but please take "y product" which we made specifically for "x product" to recover nicely and you maybe able avoid certain meds and/or research chems you get on the black market.

    I've seen many people take methylated or certain compounds and not take a SERM in pct and recover nicely.
  18. Primordial Performance Rep
    Jimbo15's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    30
    Posts
    810
    Rep Power
    493

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogz View Post
    The government does regulate and they will eventually, but until then...PP produces products which are not illegal or banned, plus they preach on how to do proper pct after each cycle.

    So basically they say, we will make "x product" but please take "y product" which we made specifically for "x product" to recover nicely and you maybe able avoid certain meds and/or research chems you get on the black market.

    I've seen many people take methylated or certain compounds and not take a SERM in pct and recover nicely.
    I've never used a serm, my balls function fine
  19. New Member
    trojanman1016's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    137
    Rep Power
    124

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by UKStrength View Post
    I agree with everyone above, the LV technology was specifically designed to improve bioavailability, so that trainees could be confident that they were getting an exact dosage of the compound ingested.

    From a hepatotoxicity standpoint, no we couldn't necessarily make certain compounds less toxic due to methylation, but the LV technology allows you to dose certain compounds lower (e.g. SD) therefore reducing the liver toxicity overall.

    I think you should also post in the suggestion thread too, it would be great to have your feedback.
    Ya, the purpose was to make a PH be absorbed more. Like a pill is only 50% absorbed and the LV is like 90% absorbed. Thats why i love PP.
  20. Board Sponsor
    Grambo's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  188 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,807
    Rep Power
    957091

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by trojanman1016 View Post
    Ya, the purpose was to make a PH be absorbed more. Like a pill is only 50% absorbed and the LV is like 90% absorbed. Thats why i love PP.
    Methylated products are going to have pretty similar absorption.
    Head Purus Labs Rep
    www.Puruslabs.net
  21. Senior Member
    Harry Manback's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,203
    Rep Power
    736

    Reputation

    The ability to dictate your own dosage alone is worth the liquid transport system. The fact that it supposedly absorbs better is a bonus.
  22. Advanced Member
    Mikey851's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Age
    29
    Posts
    587
    Rep Power
    363

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Manback View Post
    The ability to dictate your own dosage alone is worth the liquid transport system. The fact that it supposedly absorbs better is a bonus.
    I'm just speculating, but even if it doesn't absorb much better it probably absorbs quicker since there is no capsule and it's liquid. If that is the case then it works very well for dosing Superdrol pre workout.
  23. Elite Member
    stxnas's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    33
    Posts
    9,977
    Rep Power
    969163

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by n87 View Post
    Rectally, huh... That would require a different dropper.
    Hmm, what's the difference between an oral and a rectal dropper???
    <Plz Scroll Down>



























    THE TASTE!!!!
    RcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Disappointed.
    By Black Hat in forum Nutraplanet
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-17-2011, 11:06 PM
  2. Very Very disappointed...
    By AndreAnabolic in forum Bulking
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-14-2009, 10:40 AM
  3. i am disappointed
    By jenkins in forum General Chat
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 02-12-2006, 02:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in