Cycle support and Post-Cycle support: Dumb Question....
-
12-31-2008 02:20 PM
Registered User
Cycle support and Post-Cycle support: Dumb Question....
If I were to run Cycle support all the way thru the on and off portions, why would it matter so much? Some have said not to do it. But technically you're still "on" even when you're "off" right? I mean you've still got un-natural $hit cycling thru your liver while running Torem or Nolva correct? So what's the difference if a person were to run cycle assist all the way thru from beginning to end with a proper test boost and SERM?... I'm just thinking "better safe than sorry" or is this theory a waste of product? Opinions please. Thanks......
-
12-31-2008 08:04 PM
Registered User
There wouldn't be anything wrong with running cycle support throughout (and I'm assuming that you're pre-loading, too). You could tailor your support a bit at times if you wanted to micromanage things, but sticking with one support would be fine too.
Some people take the viewpoint that the liver is stressed but resilient, so "less is better", but cycle support hardly falls into that category, IME. Further, i don't believe that you can just pre-load for a week or two and then get 4+ weeks of liver protection while using oral 17-aa compounds.
Not sure about the specifics in your case or what you read, but I'd certainly be interested if anyone can explain a different rationale.
cheers
-
01-01-2009 07:31 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
willwes
If I were to run Cycle support all the way thru the on and off portions, why would it matter so much? Some have said not to do it. But technically you're still "on" even when you're "off" right? I mean you've still got un-natural $hit cycling thru your liver while running Torem or Nolva correct? So what's the difference if a person were to run cycle assist all the way thru from beginning to end with a proper test boost and SERM?... I'm just thinking "better safe than sorry" or is this theory a waste of product? Opinions please. Thanks......

Always run support supps.(liver/BP/kidney)throughout cycle and PCT...
No need to run it any long then cycle/pct length....
If its cycle support then run recommended dosage of 2 scoops AM/2 scoops PM...
PCS(test booster/estro blocker) is always good to run along side of any serm...just in case the serm is bunk...
Hope that answered your question
-
01-01-2009 08:35 PM
Registered User
I'm going to run Perfect cycle liver protection by Anabolic Extreme and also Cycle Support ; Is this pointless or worthwhile?
-
01-01-2009 09:39 PM
Banned
Originally Posted by
zacklewis
I'm going to run Perfect cycle liver protection by Anabolic Extreme and also Cycle Support ; Is this pointless or worthwhile?
better safe then sorry yanno
-
01-02-2009 09:14 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
crazyfool405
better safe then sorry yanno
Agreed....probably not necessary, but can't hurt
-
01-02-2009 09:32 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
gelin
There wouldn't be anything wrong with running cycle support throughout (and I'm assuming that you're pre-loading, too). You could tailor your support a bit at times if you wanted to micromanage things, but sticking with one support would be fine too.
Some people take the viewpoint that the liver is stressed but resilient, so "less is better", but cycle support hardly falls into that category, IME. Further, i don't believe that you can just pre-load for a week or two and then get 4+ weeks of liver protection while using oral 17-aa compounds.
Not sure about the specifics in your case or what you read, but I'd certainly be interested if anyone can explain a different rationale.
cheers
I agree completely better to be safe than sorry
-
01-03-2009 09:29 PM
Registered User
Thanks for your thoughts everyone. I figured it was a make sense question...BUMP!
-
01-03-2009 09:32 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
zacklewis
I'm going to run Perfect cycle liver protection by Anabolic Extreme and also Cycle Support ; Is this pointless or worthwhile?
I'd save the money Zach and run Anabolic Innovations Cycle Support instead of something like CEL's Cycle Assist. AI's product is a bit more inclusive with more Anti-Ox's in it...
-
01-05-2009 04:22 PM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
willwes
I'd save the money Zach and run Anabolic Innovations Cycle Support instead of something like CEL's Cycle Assist. AI's product is a bit more inclusive with more Anti-Ox's in it...


Similar Forum Threads
-
By stxnas in forum Nutraplanet
Replies: 6
Last Post: 10-15-2009, 02:19 PM
-
By A_I_Sports_Nutrition in forum Supplement Auction
Replies: 0
Last Post: 03-11-2009, 07:20 PM
-
By CROWLER in forum Company Promotions
Replies: 14
Last Post: 07-26-2008, 09:25 AM
Tags for this Thread