+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Cycle support and Post-Cycle support: Dumb Question....

  1.  12-31-2008  02:20 PM
    Registered User willwes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Stats
    6'1"  218 lbs.
    Posts
    49
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    79

    Cycle support and Post-Cycle support: Dumb Question....


    If I were to run Cycle support all the way thru the on and off portions, why would it matter so much? Some have said not to do it. But technically you're still "on" even when you're "off" right? I mean you've still got un-natural $hit cycling thru your liver while running Torem or Nolva correct? So what's the difference if a person were to run cycle assist all the way thru from beginning to end with a proper test boost and SERM?... I'm just thinking "better safe than sorry" or is this theory a waste of product? Opinions please. Thanks......



  2.  12-31-2008  08:04 PM
    Registered User gelin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Stats
    5'11"  216 lbs.
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    41
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    77

    There wouldn't be anything wrong with running cycle support throughout (and I'm assuming that you're pre-loading, too). You could tailor your support a bit at times if you wanted to micromanage things, but sticking with one support would be fine too.

    Some people take the viewpoint that the liver is stressed but resilient, so "less is better", but cycle support hardly falls into that category, IME. Further, i don't believe that you can just pre-load for a week or two and then get 4+ weeks of liver protection while using oral 17-aa compounds.

    Not sure about the specifics in your case or what you read, but I'd certainly be interested if anyone can explain a different rationale.

    cheers

    •   


        
       

  3.  01-01-2009  07:31 AM
    Registered User partyman43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Location
    small state
    Age
    37
    Posts
    613
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    373

    Originally Posted by willwes View Post
    If I were to run Cycle support all the way thru the on and off portions, why would it matter so much? Some have said not to do it. But technically you're still "on" even when you're "off" right? I mean you've still got un-natural $hit cycling thru your liver while running Torem or Nolva correct? So what's the difference if a person were to run cycle assist all the way thru from beginning to end with a proper test boost and SERM?... I'm just thinking "better safe than sorry" or is this theory a waste of product? Opinions please. Thanks......

    Always run support supps.(liver/BP/kidney)throughout cycle and PCT...

    No need to run it any long then cycle/pct length....

    If its cycle support then run recommended dosage of 2 scoops AM/2 scoops PM...

    PCS(test booster/estro blocker) is always good to run along side of any serm...just in case the serm is bunk...

    Hope that answered your question

  4.  01-01-2009  08:35 PM
    Registered User zacklewis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Stats
    5'11"  196 lbs.
    Location
    England
    Age
    27
    Posts
    124
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    118

    I'm going to run Perfect cycle liver protection by Anabolic Extreme and also Cycle Support ; Is this pointless or worthwhile?

  5.  01-01-2009  09:39 PM
    Banned crazyfool405's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Stats
    5'10"  198 lbs.
    Posts
    7,441
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    0

    Originally Posted by zacklewis View Post
    I'm going to run Perfect cycle liver protection by Anabolic Extreme and also Cycle Support ; Is this pointless or worthwhile?
    better safe then sorry yanno

  6.  01-02-2009  09:14 AM
    Registered User partyman43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Location
    small state
    Age
    37
    Posts
    613
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    373

    Originally Posted by crazyfool405 View Post
    better safe then sorry yanno

    Agreed....probably not necessary, but can't hurt

  7.  01-02-2009  09:32 AM
    Registered User jamesb2525's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Stats
    5'6"  190 lbs.
    Location
    ohio
    Age
    28
    Posts
    188
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    152

    Originally Posted by gelin View Post
    There wouldn't be anything wrong with running cycle support throughout (and I'm assuming that you're pre-loading, too). You could tailor your support a bit at times if you wanted to micromanage things, but sticking with one support would be fine too.

    Some people take the viewpoint that the liver is stressed but resilient, so "less is better", but cycle support hardly falls into that category, IME. Further, i don't believe that you can just pre-load for a week or two and then get 4+ weeks of liver protection while using oral 17-aa compounds.

    Not sure about the specifics in your case or what you read, but I'd certainly be interested if anyone can explain a different rationale.

    cheers
    I agree completely better to be safe than sorry

  8.  01-03-2009  09:29 PM
    Registered User willwes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Stats
    6'1"  218 lbs.
    Posts
    49
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    79

    Thanks for your thoughts everyone. I figured it was a make sense question...BUMP!

  9.  01-03-2009  09:32 PM
    Registered User willwes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Stats
    6'1"  218 lbs.
    Posts
    49
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    79

    Originally Posted by zacklewis View Post
    I'm going to run Perfect cycle liver protection by Anabolic Extreme and also Cycle Support ; Is this pointless or worthwhile?

    I'd save the money Zach and run Anabolic Innovations Cycle Support instead of something like CEL's Cycle Assist. AI's product is a bit more inclusive with more Anti-Ox's in it...

  10.  01-05-2009  04:22 PM
    Registered User partyman43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Location
    small state
    Age
    37
    Posts
    613
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Rep Power
    373

    Originally Posted by willwes View Post
    I'd save the money Zach and run Anabolic Innovations Cycle Support instead of something like CEL's Cycle Assist. AI's product is a bit more inclusive with more Anti-Ox's in it...




Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-15-2009, 02:19 PM
  2. For Sale: New Cycle Support and Post Cycle Support (Miscellaneous Products)
    By A_I_Sports_Nutrition in forum Supplement Auction
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-11-2009, 07:20 PM
  3. Epistane/Cycle Support/POST Cycle Support Stack on sale
    By CROWLER in forum Company Promotions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-26-2008, 09:25 AM

Tags for this Thread