Bodybuilding ForumYour AmSpace Profile
Register Forum AmSpaceStore Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Join Anabolicminds.com!! Register Today!
 
  AnabolicMinds.com Forum > General Conversation > Politics
 
LinkBack Thread Tools    Search this Thread     
Old 05-17-2008, 01:14 PM   #1
Snuggle Club™ mascot
 
bpmartyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 35
Posts: 4,017
Leave Comment
Reputation: 6241 bpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond reputebpmartyr has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 13,489, Level: 50Points: 13,489, Level: 50Points: 13,489, Level: 50
Level up: 51%, 311 Points neededLevel up: 51%, 311 Points neededLevel up: 51%, 311 Points needed
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%

View Profile
Too "Complex"?

Too "Complex"?
Thomas Sowell
Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Some people think that the reason the public misunderstands so many issues is that these issues are too "complex" for most voters. But is that really so?

With all the commotion in the media and in politics about the high price of gasoline, is there really some terribly complex explanation?

Is there anything complex about the fact that with two countries-- India and China-- having rapid economic growth, and with combined populations 8 times that of the United States, they are creating an increased demand for the world's oil supply?

The problem is not that supply and demand is such a complex explanation. The problem is that supply and demand is not an emotionally satisfying explanation. For that, you need melodrama, heroes and villains.

It is clear that many people prefer to blame President Bush. Others prefer to blame the oil companies, who have long been the favorite villains of the left.

Politicians understand that. Numerous times they have summoned the heads of oil companies before Congressional committees to be denounced on nationwide television for "greed," with the politicians calling for a federal investigation to "get to the bottom of this!"

Now that is emotionally satisfying, which is the whole point. By the time yet another federal investigation is completed-- and turns up nothing to substantiate the villainy that is supposed to be the reason for high gasoline prices-- most people's attention will have turned to something else.

Newspapers that carried the original inflammatory charges with banner headlines on page 1 will carry the story of the completed investigation that turned up nothing as a small item deep inside the paper.

This has happened at least a dozen times over the past few decades and it will probably happen again.

What about those "obscene" oil company profits we hear so much about?

An economist might ask, "Obscene compared to what?" Compared to the investments made? Compared to the new investments required to find, extract and process additional oil supplies?

Asking questions like these are among the many reasons why economists have never been very popular. They frustrate people's desires for emotionally satisfying explanations.

If corporate "greed" is the explanation for high gasoline prices, why are the government's taxes not an even bigger sign of "greed" on the part of politicians-- since taxes add more to the price of gasoline than oil company profits do?

Whatever the merits or demerits of Senator John McCain's proposal to temporarily suspend the federal taxes on gasoline, it would certainly lower the price more than confiscating all the oil companies' profits.

But it would not be as emotionally satisfying.

Senator Barack Obama clearly understands people's emotional needs and how to meet them. He wants to raise taxes on oil companies.

How that will get us more oil or lower the price of gasoline is a problem that can be left for economists to puzzle over. A politician's problem is how to get more votes-- and one of the most effective ways of doing that is to be a hero who will save us from the villains.

You have heard of the cavalry to the rescue. But have you ever heard of economists to the rescue?

While economists are talking supply and demand, politicians are talking compassion, "change" and being on the side of the angels-- and against drilling for our own oil.

Has any economist ever attracted the kinds of cheering crowds that Barack Obama has-- or even the crowds attracted by Hillary Clinton or John McCain?

If you want cheering crowds, don't bother to study economics. It will only hold you back. Tell people what they want to hear-- and they don't want to hear about supply and demand.

No, supply and demand is not too "complex." It is just not very emotionally satisfying.
 



No one can be a great thinker who does not recognize that as a thinker it is his first duty to follow his intellect to whatever conclusions it may lead. Truth gains more even by the errors of one who, with due study, and preparation, thinks for himself, than by the true opinions of those who only hold them because they do not suffer themselves to think.
bpmartyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 01:56 PM   #2
My P3N1Z is chafed.
 
kwyckemynd00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 25
Stats: 5'10" 210 lbs
Posts: 5,287
Leave Comment
Reputation: 474 kwyckemynd00 is a glorious beacon of light
Points: 7,108, Level: 36Points: 7,108, Level: 36Points: 7,108, Level: 36
Level up: 37%, 342 Points neededLevel up: 37%, 342 Points neededLevel up: 37%, 342 Points needed
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%

View Profile
Quote:
How that will get us more oil or lower the price of gasoline is a problem that can be left for economists to puzzle over. A politician's problem is how to get more votes-- and one of the most effective ways of doing that is to be a hero who will save us from the villains.
I love this quote. Its in perfect agreement with my feelings about the state of politics in the US.
 



-“Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either.”-Albert Einstein
-"Never trust the teller. Trust the tale. " - D.H. Lawrence
- "Why don't we have a Sir Isaac Newton Day?" - Me

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
kwyckemynd00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 03:31 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Nole1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 40
Stats: 6'1" 229 lbs
Posts: 119
Leave Comment
Reputation: 202 Nole1 has a spectacular aura about
Points: 317, Level: 6Points: 317, Level: 6Points: 317, Level: 6
Level up: 7%, 83 Points neededLevel up: 7%, 83 Points neededLevel up: 7%, 83 Points needed
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%

View Profile
Exactly. More taxes for the oil companies means they raise prices to offset the cost. DUH.
 
Nole1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright
2002 - 2008 Anabolicminds.com