Hillary Clinton: The most dishonest politician running.

CNorris · 07-03-2007, 05:47 PM

Hillary is absolutely pathetic. She has the nerve to criticize Bush's pardon of Libby while her husband pardoned countless real criminals that were actually convicted for committing real crimes. What a pathetic human being. Typical Democratic Bigotry.

"This commutation sends the clear signal that in this administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice." - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.

USDOJ: Office of the Pardon Attorney - Pardons Granted by President Clinton

spunkles182 · 07-03-2007, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CNorris

Hillary is absolutely pathetic. She has the nerve to criticize Bush's pardon of Libby while her husband pardoned countless real criminals that were actually convicted for committing real crimes. What a pathetic human being. Typical Democratic Bigotry.

"This commutation sends the clear signal that in this administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice." - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.

USDOJ: Office of the Pardon Attorney - Pardons Granted by President Clinton

Chad · 07-03-2007, 05:54 PM

she has my vote!

Totality · 07-03-2007, 06:03 PM

the most dishonest? nah, they are all of the same crappy level. They are no different than you or I

spunkles182 · 07-03-2007, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad

she has my vote!

why? im just curious?

CNorris · 07-03-2007, 06:19 PM

Anyone that votes for Hitlary will deserve it when the US gets attacked by an Iranian Nuclear weapon.

Chad · 07-03-2007, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunkles182

why? im just curious?

i just like the way she handles herself. i like that she is a woman in a man`s game and she doesn`t let anyone fcuk with her. i liked Dean a lot better but he isn`t running so she`ll do.

Chad · 07-03-2007, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CNorris

Anyone that votes for Hitlary will deserve it when the US gets attacked by an Iranian Nuclear weapon.

yeah cause they wouldn`t if anyone else was in office?
you think they care who is comander of the U.S when they nuke it? no.
left wing or right wing they hate ALL OF US!

CNorris · 07-03-2007, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chad

yeah cause they wouldn`t if anyone else was in office?
you think they care who is comander of the U.S when they nuke it? no.
left wing or right wing they hate ALL OF US!

Hitlary actually has more balls militarily than Obama, but she is a worthless lying pile of crap. She is the most worthless and dishonest politician I have ever seen. Anyone that votes for her deserves a ****ty country and miserable life is all i'm saying. She will not win. I hope she gets nominated.

Chad · 07-03-2007, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CNorris

Hitlary actually has more balls militarily than Obama, but she is a worthless lying pile of crap. She is the most worthless and dishonest politician I have ever seen. Anyone that votes for her deserves a ****ty country and miserable life is all i'm saying. She will not win. I hope she gets nominated.

i hate to be the messanger of bad news but im 99% sure that who ever the dems put up there will win. this country has lost trust in the gop.

Chad · 07-03-2007, 08:39 PM

on a side note: this country is fcuked either way. no matter what happens in November. no one can fix this country. we are all in a hand basket to hell.

CNorris · 07-03-2007, 09:06 PM

Sorry to break it to you, but the Far left Obamas have no chance at winning in 08. The Congress has a lower approval rating than Bush, and the US hates liberals. No far left candidate can ever win again. You will never see another Jimmy Carter. And the left is too stupid to nominate a moderate. America may not trust Bush, but to say they don't trust republicans is just stupid. Last election proved no one wants a frenchie wanna-be anti American socialist like Kerry. Any moderate or smart candidate from the Dems would have won by a landslide in 2004. Kerry was just way too far left. Obama is even more radical.

Totality · 07-05-2007, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CNorris

Anyone that votes for Hitlary will deserve it when the US gets attacked by an Iranian Nuclear weapon.

I guess 9-11 was under Hillary's watch as well? Buck up my neocon friend, Bush has only slightly decimated your party

**not_big_enuf** · 07-05-2007, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CNorris

Hitlary actually has more balls militarily than Obama, but she is a worthless lying pile of crap. She is the most worthless and dishonest politician I have ever seen. Anyone that votes for her deserves a ****ty country and miserable life is all i'm saying. She will not win. I hope she gets nominated.

Most dishonest? George Dummy takes the cake... come on. of course, he might be too stupid to actually be lying....

CNorris · 07-05-2007, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by not_big_enuf

Most dishonest? George Dummy takes the cake... come on. of course, he might be too stupid to actually be lying....

What has he dishonest for again? Let me educate you with some quotes that Moveon.org or Michael Mooreon wont tell you.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

CNorris · 07-05-2007, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Totality

I guess 9-11 was under Hillary's watch as well? Buck up my neocon friend, Bush has only slightly decimated your party

If 911 had been under Hitlary's watch there would have been no patriot act and there would be 2 911's in our history. Look at the UK and tell me that the patriot act isnt needed. If you have a straight face saying it, you have serious mental delusions.

rightship3 · 07-05-2007, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CNorris

Hillary is absolutely pathetic. She has the nerve to criticize Bush's pardon of Libby while her husband pardoned countless real criminals that were actually convicted for committing real crimes. What a pathetic human being. Typical Democratic Bigotry.

"This commutation sends the clear signal that in this administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice." - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.

USDOJ: Office of the Pardon Attorney - Pardons Granted by President Clinton

Yep clearly a double standard. She has absolutely no room to talk. Every single thing she complained about in that statement could be proved 5 fold with her and her husband. It's all about emotion and feelings, not about facts, logic, and rationale.

She just likes to use key-talking-point words to guide her rabid sheeple.