[somewhatgifted]

Originally Posted by Bobo

Nobody said they are heroes...they are just right IMO. Raise your kids in your own whack job way and let me do the same with mine. Don't tell ME what my kid HAS to listen too...especially those idiots. But we all know you liberals cna't stand them anyway no matter what they say. Tough...they aren't going anywhere.

Im anti war and dislike people who use generalizations, and one word to categorize thousands of totally differnet people. (" those pin heads", "terrorists", "people like you" statements) so that makes me liberal? This is a question.

[thesinner]

Originally Posted by somewhatgifted

Im anti war and dislike people who use generalizations, and one word to categorize thousands of totally differnet people. (" those pin heads", "terrorists", "people like you" statements) so that makes me liberal? This is a question.

You're liberal, and that's a generalization

[anabolicrhino]

This study can out a few weeks ago that show that O Rielly calls someone a derogatory name every 9 seconds.

http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/tall...e-calling-100/

[somewhatgifted]

Originally Posted by thesinner

You're liberal, and that's a generalization

Yeah, reminds me of a witch hunt. I am a person, weird confused and indifferent but a person, lol.

[Frank Costanza]

Originally Posted by anabolicrhino

This study can out a few weeks ago that show that O Rielly calls someone a derogatory name every 9 seconds.

http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/tall...e-calling-100/

Boo hoo...

"Not so, Mr. Conway responds. Labels are only counted as name-calling if the context supports that classification. “Left” by itself might not register, while “Kool-Aid left” counts twice because “Kool-Aid” is name-calling and it confers a negative connotation onto “left.” Mr. O’Reilly’s facial expression and tone of voice also were considered."

[B5150]

So many perspectives to be upset about this from. I am rather upset by the idea that at a public school there would be a mandatory attendance to such a display of irresponsibility and ignorance. They are on our dime with our children. Not to get off topic, but damn, they outlaw prayer, the name or word God and now we have this. Quite the display of the seriously distorted moral or value system of our government and or public education system and our society as a whole. We will not tolerate our kids experimenting with God but we will help them experiment with homosexuality and mind altering drugs.

Kids will always be curious about these sort of things. The curiosity if further piqued by the bombardment from our overstimulating media outlets such as the myspace type communities, MTV type entertainment, TV commercials and news stands.

There have always been those that encourage this sort of illicite behavior to either capitaize or encourage or validate their own distorted view on what is acceptable personal social and psychological develoment.

There is sufficient evidence to support the fact that one use of some drugs illicite drugs will permenantly alter brain chemistry. Not to mention the fact that there is so much evidnce out their that alcoholism and addiction is hereditary and imbeded in genetic makeup passed down from generation to generation.

There is sufficent evidence to support the fact that one occasion of unprotected hetero sex can result in unwanted pregnacy, transmition of STD's, hep C and other communicable disease. Complicate matters even further with bi gay sexual experimentation and the health risks alone are astronomical.

The idea of encouraging same sex experimentation is completly absurd. This whole open gay bi social culture is not a sign of our diverse orientation that has now become more accepatble to have out of the closet. It is a lucivious and permiscuous social trend that is being perpetuated and socialized by our media and entertainement.

The idea that we have our public schools facilitating a mandatory assembly encouraging or promoting this sort of experimentation with substances and sexuality, even safely, is completely irresponsible and a demonstration of how ignorant they are on many levels.

[Frank Costanza]

[bpmartyr]

I second that.

[Mass_69]

Very well put, B

[Blownkbgt]

.....

well, the people responded to the immigration fiasco,

and what happened , nothing, they are still trying to force it through.

these politicians are worried about staying in office more than doing thier job....we need term limits.... but it wont happen

not when they can bring in illegals to vote for them.....


P.S.

in before the lock

IBTL!!!!

[spunkles182]

Originally Posted by B5150

The idea that we have our public schools facilitating a mandatory assembly encouraging or promoting this sort of experimentation with substances and sexuality, even safely, is completely irresponsible and a demonstration of how ignorant they are on many levels.

[anabolicrhino]

The fact that these schools are introducing any kind of life style advocacy is scary.

This is what gives kids the idea that they must choose only one way of life before they even turn 18 !

[Rufio]

Uh yeah, if you think O Reilly can civilly "take it" then you haven't seen his "debate" with Jeremy Glick. And no, the news is not "liberal." It's not really liberal or conversative. It's Democrats and Republicans saying why the other screwed up and why you should vote for them. If someone criticizes the INTENTIONS of US politicians (see Chavez and Churchill), the entire media butchers their statements and claims they're violent warmongers encouraging war on America. You also find Republican pundits like Glenn Beck on CNN, so it's not like the Democrats dominate the media either.


And the "go to Holland if you like it" statement is retarded. Anyone who uses the "love it or leave it" cliche should be disqualified from a debate. I like Holland's greater civil liberties regarding sex and "soft" drugs.


Now on the issue of encouraging experimentation in schools, yes a school is not the place to encourage such behaviors. However, I'll also add that I don't think schools should be the focus of the abstinence progaganda either. When I was in high school, their idea of "sex ed" was a bunch of exaggerations of the statistical risk of STDs and telling people not to have sex before marriage. No mention of how to put condoms on correctly, which positions carry a greater risk of transmitting diseases, or anything like that. Just a bunch of "wait until marriage" propaganda. I'm betting a good deal of STDs and pregnancy comes from people never learning proper condom use or the greater risk of things like anal.


School sex ed should be sex ed, period. Not propaganda telling people how to conduct themselves.

[B5150]

Originally Posted by Rufio

Now on the issue of encouraging experimentation in schools, yes a school is not the place to encourage such behaviors. However, I'll also add that I don't think schools should be the focus of the abstinence progaganda either. When I was in high school, their idea of "sex ed" was a bunch of exaggerations of the statistical risk of STDs and telling people not to have sex before marriage. No mention of how to put condoms on correctly, which positions carry a greater risk of transmitting diseases, or anything like that. Just a bunch of "wait until marriage" propaganda. I'm betting a good deal of STDs and pregnancy comes from people never learning proper condom use or the greater risk of things like anal.


School sex ed should be sex ed, period. Not propaganda telling people how to conduct themselves.

Had the parents of our society not failed to provide any sort of reasonable sound and logical parenting skill to their children there would be no need for sex ed in schools. Our family unit and its moral and ethical values have declined and been erroded to the point that someone has to save our children. The schools attempt and fail terribly because they are made up of this same decade society.

It is the parents role to educate their children on matters of becoming functional, safe and healthy adults. We are not raising children we are raising adults.

I am the most empowered and the most responsible to educate my children in these areas of life. I do not rely on any public system to do so. Those who do are failing at their role as parents and are failing their children. My childrens lives depend on and are entrusted to me and no one else.

[Rufio]

"Hey, son. This is how you put on a condom properly. And take a look at these statistics regarding which positions carry the most danger.&quo