Stalinis liberals want to **** all over the constitution once again!

Status
Not open for further replies.
CNorris

CNorris

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
Liberals are just plain pathetic. Now they want a government controlled media to limit freedom of press. The 2nd amendment was made for the moment any of these Neo-Stalinist far leftist Kucinich types even try to regulate the content in our free press.
I for one will be buying a gun if Hitlary or Osama Obama wins.
Hitlary and Boxer want to control the media
 
Dwight Schrute

Dwight Schrute

I am faster than 80% of all snakes
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
That's because conservative talk radio completely dominates the market. Air America and anything liberal basically goes bankrupt every time. Been this way for a while.

Its the reason Fox News is so big. There is an audience that has been bottled up for so long because the mainstream is left wing biased.
 
CNorris

CNorris

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
Exactly. Liberals are squirming because their big propaganda arm is being chopped off by the free press. So much for liberals and their claim to respect and uphold the constitution.
 
anabolicrhino

anabolicrhino

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
That's because conservative talk radio completely dominates the market. Air America and anything liberal basically goes bankrupt every time. Been this way for a while.

Its the reason Fox News is so big. There is an audience that has been bottled up for so long because the mainstream is left wing biased.
FoxNews and Rupport Murdoch have done an excellent job in converting working middle class non political Americans into the Bush Administration's mind set. It is unusual because the Bush Administration policies really do not help the middle class.

The funding of the war in Iraq is costing these same middle class Americans more than anything else. This is also unusual because traditionally the conservative republicans have been the anti- war party. It is not fiscally responsible for a government to wage an occupation in a foreign land. It was the democrats who brought the US into every other war and the conservative republicans who brought home the troops!

FoxNews' continued support for the Bush Administration's war in Iraq does not in away support conservatism.

Ultimately Foxnews is supporting corporate oil interests and not conservative middle class Americans. The war is making the upper class war profiteers wealthy while using the working middle class to pay for it!

Supposed conservative talk radio is supported by corporate interests and supposed liberal shows are not!
 
zbtboy

zbtboy

Anabolic Innovations Rep
Awards
1
  • Established
Its good to see you back at it CNorris. I needed a good laugh this morning.
 
Dwight Schrute

Dwight Schrute

I am faster than 80% of all snakes
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
FoxNews and Rupport Murdoch have done an excellent job in converting working middle class non political Americans into the Bush Administration's mind set. It is unusual because the Bush Administration policies really do not help the middle class.
Right, they "converted" them. :rolleyes:

The funding of the war in Iraq is costing these same middle class Americans more than anything else. This is also unusual because traditionally the conservative republicans have been the anti- war party. It is not fiscally responsible for a government to wage an occupation in a foreign land. It was the democrats who brought the US into every other war and the conservative republicans who brought home the troops!
Could care less. Comparing the parties every decade shows drastic difference.
FoxNews' continued support for the Bush Administration's war in Iraq does not in away support conservatism.
Support? I guess you don't watch Fox that much.
Ultimately Foxnews is supporting corporate oil interests and not conservative middle class Americans. The war is making the upper class war profiteers wealthy while using the working middle class to pay for it!
I knew we would finally get it. Rhino can't make a political post without mentioning those evil corporations who profit. How dare they!

Supposed conservative talk radio is supported by corporate interests and supposed liberal shows are not!
George Soros anyone?
 
Dwight Schrute

Dwight Schrute

I am faster than 80% of all snakes
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
Squeaks4ver

Squeaks4ver

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
Is it just me or can't liberals do anything really via the voters request. I am sorta under the impression that the only reason why there is any liberal aspects in our nation today is because the go run to the courts who have leftists chewing in the constitution
 
zbtboy

zbtboy

Anabolic Innovations Rep
Awards
1
  • Established
Is it just me or can't liberals do anything really via the voters request. I am sorta under the impression that the only reason why there is any liberal aspects in our nation today is because the go run to the courts who have leftists chewing in the constitution
What exactly is liberalism in your book? Please define it.
 
anabolicrhino

anabolicrhino

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Support? I guess you don't watch Fox that much.

You are correct, sir If I watched anymore I would probably agree with you more!!!


I knew we would finally get it. Rhino can't make a political post without mentioning those evil corporations who profit. How dare they!

Finally we agree!!! Corporations are inherently soulless. They exist only for shareholder profit. Human beings that make profit based equity are fine and dandy in my book! It is good to see you favor the humans over the corporations!!!
It is good to see you favor the humans over the corporations!!!

I only wish I could rep you !!!
 
Squeaks4ver

Squeaks4ver

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
sorry rhino.. just when you and i were like getting all warm and fuzzy with each other.. i have to post this. but don't worry, you are still a sexy man





1) Liberals, true liberals, Loath the military. They have no use at all for military spending, nor do they have any use for the young men and women who volunteer to fight. Don't believe me? Clinton wrote in a letter home from England that he "Loathed the Military". Still don't believe me? The absentee ballots of thousands of military personel were held hostage by the liberals and their lawyers in 2000.

2) Liberals want income redistribution. Liberals do not like the fact that some people are successful and others are not. They see this as being unfair.

3) Liberals feel that there is no authority in the world except listening to their "inner self". In other words, there really is no right or wrong. Excuses can be made for every crime. Damn the idiot who tries to paint anything in black and white. Even calling the terrorists in dirty nightshirts who took down our towers "evil" is considered by liberals to be "intolerant".

4) Toleration is the golden rule of all liberals. As long as they are tolerating things that they happen to agree with. Hypocritically, they do not tolerate any viewpoint that differs from theirs. Should you dissagree with them they will do all that they can to destroy you.

I also think of New Orleans The "chocolate city" and liberal kingdom. They did very well for themselves after the storm.

They want control, control, control. They want you to bend at the knee at their Icon of Castro and Clinton as you beg for every last ounce of what you need to live. Lets have the goverment run the oil industry, lets have the gov run power, lets have the gov run our auto industry.And they cry cry cry: "its not fair that AM radio has more conservative talkers" "its not fair that someone invented a way to sell goods a fair price and run other stores out of buisness" " its not fair that we have Bush in the white house. so LETS GET HIM!!!! Oh wait we cant get him.. Lets get ROVE!!! oh wait we cant get him either.. I KNOW! lets set up a trap so we get LIBBY even though there was no crime before the matter was brought to court. Mean while behind the doors of a GE icebox we have liberals stuffing dirty money there to keep it fresh. We have another liberal giving a staffer a gun to bring into their offices and then lie and say it wasn't his, then say oh wait, it is mine but i dont know how he got it. Hell at least Clinton did a criminal act before the Right went after him with all their teeth. Liberals don't wait for truth. They throw out as much bread as they can and HOPE they get a bite.. and when they do, they are like a virus. ( which i am very impressed with)

And what is funny... more times a liberal will moan about the government and how they horrible it runs things.. and yet THEY WANT THEM TO RUN MORE THINGS!!

Liberalism is america's slow bleed that they are getting off on while they watch our troops serve us and give their lives. Liberals are the news that are so happy to announce that there will be a even number of troops killed. I was so angry when they all dropped the metaphorical ball when the 1000 troop was killed.. I am not saying they want them to die, i am saying they hate Bush so much they want them to die so they can show themselves that they think they are correct.

I will say this now and i hope the liberals do not tax the internet ( because they want to) so much that most people cant use it.. a Liberal will bring down our country not a conservative .

Please note that i am talking about liberals and conservatives not republicans and democrats.
 
Dwight Schrute

Dwight Schrute

I am faster than 80% of all snakes
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
It is good to see you favor the humans over the corporations!!!

I only wish I could rep you !!!
I don't lump all corporations into the "evil" category. :)


To you evil is spelled corp. :D
 
anabolicrhino

anabolicrhino

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
sorry rhino.. just when you and i were like getting all warm and fuzzy with each other.. i have to post this. but don't worry, you are still a sexy man





1) Liberals, true liberals, Loath the military. They have no use at all for military spending, nor do they have any use for the young men and women who volunteer to fight. Don't believe me? Clinton wrote in a letter home from England that he "Loathed the Military". Still don't believe me? The absentee ballots of thousands of military personel were held hostage by the liberals and their lawyers in 2000.

2) Liberals want income redistribution. Liberals do not like the fact that some people are successful and others are not. They see this as being unfair.

3) Liberals feel that there is no authority in the world except listening to their "inner self". In other words, there really is no right or wrong. Excuses can be made for every crime. Damn the idiot who tries to paint anything in black and white. Even calling the terrorists in dirty nightshirts who took down our towers "evil" is considered by liberals to be "intolerant".

4) Toleration is the golden rule of all liberals. As long as they are tolerating things that they happen to agree with. Hypocritically, they do not tolerate any viewpoint that differs from theirs. Should you dissagree with them they will do all that they can to destroy you.

I also think of New Orleans The "chocolate city" and liberal kingdom. They did very well for themselves after the storm.

They want control, control, control. They want you to bend at the knee at their Icon of Castro and Clinton as you beg for every last ounce of what you need to live. Lets have the goverment run the oil industry, lets have the gov run power, lets have the gov run our auto industry.And they cry cry cry: "its not fair that AM radio has more conservative talkers" "its not fair that someone invented a way to sell goods a fair price and run other stores out of buisness" " its not fair that we have Bush in the white house. so LETS GET HIM!!!! Oh wait we cant get him.. Lets get ROVE!!! oh wait we cant get him either.. I KNOW! lets set up a trap so we get LIBBY even though there was no crime before the matter was brought to court. Mean while behind the doors of a GE icebox we have liberals stuffing dirty money there to keep it fresh. We have another liberal giving a staffer a gun to bring into their offices and then lie and say it wasn't his, then say oh wait, it is mine but i dont know how he got it. Hell at least Clinton did a criminal act before the Right went after him with all their teeth. Liberals don't wait for truth. They throw out as much bread as they can and HOPE they get a bite.. and when they do, they are like a virus. ( which i am very impressed with)

And what is funny... more times a liberal will moan about the government and how they horrible it runs things.. and yet THEY WANT THEM TO RUN MORE THINGS!!

Liberalism is america's slow bleed that they are getting off on while they watch our troops serve us and give their lives. Liberals are the news that are so happy to announce that there will be a even number of troops killed. I was so angry when they all dropped the metaphorical ball when the 1000 troop was killed.. I am not saying they want them to die, i am saying they hate Bush so much they want them to die so they can show themselves that they think they are correct.

I will say this now and i hope the liberals do not tax the internet ( because they want to) so much that most people cant use it.. a Liberal will bring down our country not a conservative .

Please note that i am talking about liberals and conservatives not republicans and democrats.
Squeaks, I know you wouldn't respect me if I gave up on us too easily so...

I am a registered Republican. The Republican party at the time (1984) made the most sense to me.

My political beliefs would be described best as Libertarian by todays standards, although there is an Anarchistic vibe to the Libertarian party. My core beliefs are true 1930's vintage Libertarian which is a socialist structure without central power.

Today this is most similar to how E-Bay works, there is bottom up governance that is administrated centrally but is ultimately controlled by the end users.

Your views on the Liberal agenda seem very accurate. I never did trust the Liberal idealism and the Democratic party is just liberalism for profit.
 
Squeaks4ver

Squeaks4ver

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
"The Republican party at the time (1984) made the most sense to me."


mmm that got me going!! You don't even have to buy me dinner or get me drun, I'm all yours!!!! lol
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
My younger daughter's (3yo) name is Veronica Reagan (I'll leave the last name off). Nickname is Ronnie ;)
 
CNorris

CNorris

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
FoxNews and Rupport Murdoch have done an excellent job in converting working middle class non political Americans into the Bush Administration's mind set. It is unusual because the Bush Administration policies really do not help the middle class.

The funding of the war in Iraq is costing these same middle class Americans more than anything else. This is also unusual because traditionally the conservative republicans have been the anti- war party. It is not fiscally responsible for a government to wage an occupation in a foreign land. It was the democrats who brought the US into every other war and the conservative republicans who brought home the troops!

FoxNews' continued support for the Bush Administration's war in Iraq does not in away support conservatism.

Ultimately Foxnews is supporting corporate oil interests and not conservative middle class Americans. The war is making the upper class war profiteers wealthy while using the working middle class to pay for it!

Supposed conservative talk radio is supported by corporate interests and supposed liberal shows are not!
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
FoxNews and Rupport Murdoch have done an excellent job in converting working middle class non political Americans into the Bush Administration's mind set. It is unusual because the Bush Administration policies really do not help the middle class.

The funding of the war in Iraq is costing these same middle class Americans more than anything else. This is also unusual because traditionally the conservative republicans have been the anti- war party. It is not fiscally responsible for a government to wage an occupation in a foreign land. It was the democrats who brought the US into every other war and the conservative republicans who brought home the troops!

FoxNews' continued support for the Bush Administration's war in Iraq does not in away support conservatism.

Ultimately Foxnews is supporting corporate oil interests and not conservative middle class Americans. The war is making the upper class war profiteers wealthy while using the working middle class to pay for it!

Supposed conservative talk radio is supported by corporate interests and supposed liberal shows are not!

Liberals playing checkers, not chess. Watch the movie/documentary "Obsession". Radical Islam's goal is to reclaim the earth in the name of their warped interpretation of the qaran, and kill all non-believers. That is very clear, has been stated by all of their groups many times, and is something they put into action. It is a piece of their credo and teachings from childhood. Saying that the policy of establishing sectarian democratic governments in the middle east does not help the american middle class is an incredibly short sighted mindset. If we don't sack up and do it, eventually they will spend their oil money on suitcase nukes and take down Wall Street trading, or just a dirty bomb in LA.

Its only a matter of time. We have to begin the long expensive process of first establishing a government where rule of law rather than rule of religion is in place. Then the economy needs to be grown so that the general poplace has the opportunity to work at jobs and feed themselves, rather than relying on welfare from the government (who is collecting the oil money). That is so as to give the next generation of young people hope, as the lack of there being any way to better themselves EXCEPT to die as a martyr in the fight to have radical islam rule the world and collect their 40 virgins in the afterlife is why they are willing to be suicide bombers.

Once there are a generation, maybe 2 that grow up in a land of opportunity rather than in a land of bare survial, things will change. But we do need to be there at least in some capacity (even if just "consulting") for at least the next 20-30 years.
 
anabolicrhino

anabolicrhino

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Liberals playing checkers, not chess. Watch the movie/documentary "Obsession". Radical Islam's goal is to reclaim the earth in the name of their warped interpretation of the qaran, and kill all non-believers. That is very clear, has been stated by all of their groups many times, and is something they put into action. It is a piece of their credo and teachings from childhood. Saying that the policy of establishing sectarian democratic governments in the middle east does not help the american middle class is an incredibly short sighted mindset.

Well, only because "setting up governments" on foreign lands has never helped the American middle class in the past. Some have cost the middle class plenty of tax dollars(Israel). Most of these "set up" government flat out fail and have to be replaced at a great expense in human lives and money(Iraq)

If we don't sack up and do it, eventually they will spend their oil money on suitcase nukes and take down Wall Street trading, or just a dirty bomb in LA.

That would be the Saudi's, not the Iraqis or Iranians!

Its only a matter of time. We have to begin the long expensive process of first establishing a government where rule of law rather than rule of religion is in place. Then the economy needs to be grown so that the general poplace has the opportunity to work at jobs and feed themselves, rather than relying on welfare from the government (who is collecting the oil money). That is so as to give the next generation of young people hope, as the lack of there being any way to better themselves EXCEPT to die as a martyr in the fight to have radical islam rule the world

and collect their 40 virgins in the afterlife is why they are willing to be suicide bombers.

Once there are a generation, maybe 2 that grow up in a land of opportunity rather than in a land of bare survial, things will change. But we do need to be there at least in some capacity (even if just "consulting") for at least the next 20-30 years.
I agree!...but;

Why do the US taxpayers have to pay for this process?

Why do American soldiers have to die for someone else's freedom ?
 
CNorris

CNorris

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
I agree!...but;

Why do the US taxpayers have to pay for this process?

Why do American soldiers have to die for someone else's freedom ?
Why do hard working people have to pay for Illegal Immigrants health care, roads and food for their children?

Why do CEO's making millions have to pay 70% income tax?

Take your answer, and put that into a response for your own hippy question. You will have an answer.

OH YEAH!! KOOL AID!
 
bigSMokey

bigSMokey

Member
Awards
0
Radical Islam's goal is to reclaim the earth in the name of their warped interpretation of the qaran, and kill all non-believers.
This correct, but you are confusing the severity of their beliefs with the severity of their threat.



eventually they will spend their oil money on suitcase nukes and take down Wall Street trading, or just a dirty bomb in LA.
THEY just might. However the question is who are "they". I'll give you hint - you won't find 'bin' or 'al' in their name.

We have to begin the long expensive process
Keywords: long and expensive. Think military-industrial complex. If the missiles are not launched, new ones won't be manufactured. If the guns and tanks don't fire, no new munitions will be made.

Eisenhower (a Republican) desparately warned of the military-industrial complex back in 1961. So much was this that he essentially used it as his farewell speech to the nation.

...of first establishing a government where rule of law rather than rule of religion is in place.
Are you referring to Iraq? Iraq, where Saddam, although a tyrant, ruled the country with an iron fist. "Rule of law" was firmly in place. Now Iraq is closer than it has been in a long time to becoming a theocracy (that is, the rule of religion). Only the continuing death and disfigurement of our troops and Iraqis can slow this process.


40 virgins in the afterlife is why they are willing to be suicide bombers.
I think it's actually 72. But this is a as trivial as arguing over the number of times Fox News lies in one day.

But we do need to be there at least in some capacity (even if just "consulting") for at least the next 20-30 years
"Consulting"...I like that. That has a nice Bush Whitehouse spin to it. Do they call the troops that lose limbs "Non-temporarily Disabled" over in Foxland?

I've actually seen occupation estimates even longer than that. You don't think were going to drop all this money on "liberating" the country with the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world and then just leave.
 
Dwight Schrute

Dwight Schrute

I am faster than 80% of all snakes
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
I think it's actually 72. But this is a as trivial as arguing over the number of times Fox News lies in one day.
Right, the mass media is MUCH better. Dan Rather anyone? :rolleyes:

72 could be the amount of bombings in Tikrit that NBC and the New York Times reports but when the plans to bomb JFK are thwarted there is only a small blurb on the front page and the rest is on page 37. NBC didn't report it until 2 days later.


"Consulting"...I like that. That has a nice Bush Whitehouse spin to it. Do they call the troops that lose limbs "Non-temporarily Disabled" over in Foxland?
Well in liberal land they call them baby killers and murderers (thank you Murtha!), so take your pick. I'll stick to "Foxland" and their blatant lying. :rolleyes:

I've actually seen occupation estimates even longer than that. You don't think were going to drop all this money on "liberating" the country with the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world and then just leave.
Vote for Hillary and Obama. They want to keeps troops in Iraq, just not "combat" troops. :rolleyes:
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
This correct, but you are confusing the severity of their beliefs with the severity of their threat.
So you are suggesting that we let it fester up and boil up till the threat is imminent instead? I'd rather fight on their soil than ours.

Are you referring to Iraq? Iraq, where Saddam, although a tyrant, ruled the country with an iron fist. "Rule of law" was firmly in place. Now Iraq is closer than it has been in a long time to becoming a theocracy (that is, the rule of religion). Only the continuing death and disfigurement of our troops and Iraqis can slow this process.
If you call what Iraq had under Saddam the rule of law, you are sorely mistaken. A rule of law requires written laws and process that are followed, not whims of a dictator and his soldiers.

I've actually seen occupation estimates even longer than that. You don't think were going to drop all this money on "liberating" the country with the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world and then just leave.
I don't see, and haven't seen the entire time, exactly how the oil thing fits in. Exactly where do we theoretically get any value from the oil? We've spent I forget how many billions on a war that was authorized by Congress. The oil's price is controlled by OPEC, the oil money goes to Iraq. And before you bring up the nonsense of "Then why aren't we going into Darfur" its 2 easy reasons - The sissy democrats will vote against growing the american military any larger so we dont have the manpower since we are already engaged elsewhere, and Darfur has 0% chance of attacking the US or US interests. It is a completely horrible situation, but it is a local one.
 
anabolicrhino

anabolicrhino

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Why do hard working people have to pay for Illegal Immigrants health care, roads and food for their children?

Why do CEO's making millions have to pay 70% income tax?

Take your answer, and put that into a response for your own hippy question. You will have an answer.

OH YEAH!! KOOL AID!
You really like Kool AID, huh- I don't think you are allowed to pimp products on this forum:icon_lol:

It's amazing you completely ignored the questions from my post,
but...

I agree about not paying for illegal immigrants health care and I don't think anyone should pay taxes on their income.

The roads are payed for by the gasoline tax!

..as far as feeding children i guess as a "hippy" I would just feed them because that is what your supposed to do!

Why do rightwingers feed their kids???:think:
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Why do rightwingers feed their kids???:think:

The issue is tax money going to pay for food and health care for children of illegal immigrants. Even for citizens. Why should my tax dollars go to pay to feed your children while you are alive? Why do democrats refuse to accept personal responsibility? People drive around in Camrys on 22s, and because their primary income is illegal, untaxed, and unrecorded they can and do collect federal benefits including food stamps, welfare, section 8 housing, and medicare. Even leaving out the camry part, there is no constitutional right to food, no constitutional right to a home, no constitutional right to medical help. If you are going to say there is, please quote where in the constitution or bill of rights it is. This is not something the federal government should be shelling out tax dollars for. Local areas up to the size of states can deal with that issue as they choose, including using real estate taxes or sales taxes to fund it. That would fit the constitution.

Again, the Iraq war is the sort of thing federal tax dollars are supposed to go for, protecting american interests for both the long and short terms.

I'm really more a libertarian/constitutionalist than republican, but c'est la vie, we're stuck in a 2 party system, which will only get worse if we go to national primaries. i wish we had 1 man one vote, a democracy rather than a republic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads


Top