Looks like the Dems have Bush by the bush

Page 1 of 4 123 ... Last
  1. Looks like the Dems have Bush by the bush


    White House, Congress refuse to blink - Politics - MSNBC.com

    They are going to get the info they want no matter how much the white house crys about it. And the courts will back them up


  2. actually its a case of seperation of powers. the president has a choice in his policy to allow his people to testify, as some presidents have done in the past, but it is not the law and the constitution would have to be amended in order to force any information regarding this case out. Its actually a very simple, cut and dry issue here but the media likes to play on people's ignorance of their own government's internal rules and regulations.
    •   
       


  3. Squeaks...it took me a second, but i love you avatar...

  4. lol took you a second??? most guys i end up with have that problem too

  5. wait, is that you?
    •   
       


  6. In that case, I love you.

  7. Now I just feel creepy...I'm going to slowly step away from the thread...


  8. haha relax, i am just messing with you

  9. @ the gayness above!

  10. Ok, so what were we talking about? Oh, right, avatars... It's nice

  11. this is what alwas happens when i am ready to get into a good political slober knocker. lol

  12. Back on topic. Sorry for my gayness ealier...long week.

    But I don't understand the need to explain the firings. If you want to look historically, why didn't we look into Clinton when he fired a ****load of them?

    Now I am a very left sided republican, and not a Bush supporter and I voted an almost completely democratic ticket this past november, but I see this as a Democratically controlled government trying to flex thier newly aquired political muscle.

    Guilliani in '08!!!

  13. Hope they get to the bottom of this, "people should not fear their governments, and governments should be free of their people."

  14. Quote Originally Posted by PumpingIron View Post
    Back on topic. Sorry for my gayness ealier...long week.

    But I don't understand the need to explain the firings. If you want to look historically, why didn't we look into Clinton when he fired a ****load of them?

    Now I am a very left sided republican, and not a Bush supporter and I voted an almost completely democratic ticket this past november, but I see this as a Democratically controlled government trying to flex thier newly aquired political muscle.

    Guilliani in '08!!!
    The only difference is that non of those let go by Clinton (remember they were appointed by Bush #1 not by Clinton) have come forward saying they were pressured into looking at the other party by House and Senate members. Also, the administration brought this on themselves by changing their story like 6 times.

    One thing I think is funny: Bush wants to wield Executive Priv and protect Rove and Miers. Now Executive priv is only valid when an aid is giving advice or talking with the President. The President and everyone else has said he was removed from this whole ordeal and that it never came up with him. So how can executive priv be used in this case?

    I cant wait for the next president...I dont even care who at this point.

  15. Clinton actually let people go that were looking into his Arkansas land deals, after they were fired they no longer had any teeth. Clinton did a more correct thing by getting rid of everyone, its less shady but still as with Bush, not against any law for him to do. If you run a buisness, you can hire and fire anyone you want, thats what they can do as well.

    Rove, as well as Miers, are still in a role as a white house aid and are under the protection of the constitution regardless if advice is given. People like you and me as well as those on the hill and the foggy bottom are not required to know what advice aids give. If a president had to worry about what aids say to him because the congress might be offended and call them in to testify, then we will never be able to bounce free and open ideas around in any administration. We would be in a worse state of political correctness than we already are.

    The worst thing the white house did was admit there were mistakes in accepting the resignations of these people. There were no mistakes, they should have allowed even more of the clinton left overs to end their post. There is no issue here and if those pressing the issue aren't careful they might find themselves in a situation in a year or so.

  16. Quote Originally Posted by Squeaks4ver View Post
    Clinton actually let people go that were looking into his Arkansas land deals, after they were fired they no longer had any teeth. Clinton did a more correct thing by getting rid of everyone, its less shady but still as with Bush, not against any law for him to do. If you run a buisness, you can hire and fire anyone you want, thats what they can do as well.

    Rove, as well as Miers, are still in a role as a white house aid and are under the protection of the constitution regardless if advice is given. People like you and me as well as those on the hill and the foggy bottom are not required to know what advice aids give. If a president had to worry about what aids say to him because the congress might be offended and call them in to testify, then we will never be able to bounce free and open ideas around in any administration. We would be in a worse state of political correctness than we already are.

    The worst thing the white house did was admit there were mistakes in accepting the resignations of these people. There were no mistakes, they should have allowed even more of the clinton left overs to end their post. There is no issue here and if those pressing the issue aren't careful they might find themselves in a situation in a year or so.
    Agreed. And I will reiterate my intial statement that this is more of a witch hunt against the current administration. More of a "we're have the power" thing.

    As far as what Clinton did, we haven't had an executive officer in this country without anytype of corruption as far back as I can research. I'm not commenting on the extent of thier corruption, just that it is always there in a capitalistic government.



    As far as what zbt said, I too cannot wait until we get a new president. Hopefully a republican that is graceful and tactful and not quite as bull-headed. Both of the major canidates look as though they are suitable in this manor.

  17. As far as protection against aids go, what I heard last night from John Dean, former Nixon legal counsel, is that they are only protected when dealing directly with the President. A conversation between aids is not protected, nor is when an aid contacts people in the Justice department. So if Bush was never briefed about any of this from his aids how can they be protected? According to Dean, they are not. At this point, thats all I can base my knowledge on the matter on.

    I'd be really suprised if Rudy makes it out if the GOP alive. As a Dem, Rudy is the type of Republican i would want in office. With the way things are going now though, the democrats could probably put forth a Monkey and win the general. oh wait...we may just do that with Hillary.

  18. theres this nail infront of me, and its just been hit directly, twice. "anyone else" lol.

  19. actually the democratic party is gearing up to be like their McGovernist past, and he lost BIG TIME against nixon. At this point,if the democrats stay on their path, and if the Republicans offer a TRUE solid conservative, no liberal will have a chance.

    Also, the democrat party isn't holding up very well as the majority. Today's vote to help spinich farmers ( and give some money to the troops for a year) was only passed by 218-212 those 6 votes were bought by Grandma Speaker. This vote will be a good wake up call for conservatives to rally around. The Rebuplican party exploded and lost power thus the people removed most of the liberal members of the party; however, the democrats are imploding and have no ability to gain control. One aspect of proof comes from today's vote that SHOULD have been party line.

  20. But what right sided republican do they have?

    It doesn't matter much, the American vote is going to be sueded to vote for Edwards now anyways.

  21. Bush is a tool. Its called abuse of power.

    ps. squeaks, i like your avatar too. thought it was a dead deer at first.
    hahahaha

  22. Bush is a tool and it may be an abuse of power but its an acceptable one.

  23. Quote Originally Posted by PumpingIron View Post
    Bush is a tool and it may be an abuse of power but its an acceptable one.
    well EVERYTHING is acceptable these days with our gorernment. You can lie and do drugs and steal and cheat on your wife and send lower income young peolpe over seas to get killed so you can get sweet oil deals and so on and so on.
    The American people have become numb to seeing the people they elect fcuk them over

  24. Thats what i'm saying....Guilliani in 08...


    Oh and cheap oil huh? That wasn't the only reason for the war but anyways...it worked out well for us huh?

  25. Quote Originally Posted by PumpingIron View Post
    Thats what i'm saying....Guilliani in 08...


    Oh and cheap oil huh? That wasn't the only reason for the war but anyways...it worked out well for us huh?
    i dont even think im going to vote next year. and i agree that oil wasn`t the only reason but it was a bad reason.

  26. How The Hell Do You Think I Look Like A Dead Deer!!!!!

  27. Anyone who doesn't vote cant complain about the gov't in power. wrong thread lol.
    Last edited by somewhatgifted; 03-24-2007 at 06:33 PM.

  28. Quote Originally Posted by Squeaks4ver View Post
    How The Hell Do You Think I Look Like A Dead Deer!!!!!
    it was just a joke. did you read the dead deer thread in gen chat?
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 164
    Last Post: 10-31-2012, 06:03 PM
  2. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-11-2007, 07:02 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 07:41 PM
  4. Looks like the ban is going to go through!
    By Fleetcare in forum General Chat
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-03-2004, 11:20 AM
  5. Looks like AROD is going to the Yankees
    By Rictor33 in forum General Chat
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 02-18-2004, 11:48 AM
Log in
Log in