Speaking of media staging facts

  1. Speaking of media staging facts


    EU Referendum

    note that the blog owners are brits pissed on the BBC wasting their tax money on one sided blabber, and not right or left wingers.


  2. PS roiters have now suspended this photographer as he was caught photoshopping two other photos(see http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/). they previously denied that.

  3. more funny stuff.

    Drinking From Home: Extreme Makeover - Beirut Edition

    the same woman pictured in front of her destoyed apartment, in two different places and two weeks apart.

    she must be really rich?
    •   
       


  4. Quote Originally Posted by judge-mental
    more funny stuff.

    Drinking From Home: Extreme Makeover - Beirut Edition

    the same woman pictured in front of her destoyed apartment, in two different places and two weeks apart.

    she must be really rich?
    lol.

  5. the sad story of how we got to the media siding with terrorists

    Ed Driscoll.com: Picture Kill: How We Got Here

    Far more dangerous than the hard anti-Americanism of the far left (and some elements of the far right) is the moral relativism that prevails among Western liberal elites, especially in journalism. Exhibit A is Reuters. As we noted on Sept. 24, 2001:
    Stephen Jukes, global news editor for Reuters, the British wire service, has ordered his scribes not to use the word terror to refer to the Sept. 11 atrocity. . . . "We all know that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter and that Reuters upholds the principle that we do not use the word terrorist," Jukes writes in an internal memo. "To be frank, it adds little to call the attack on the World Trade Center a terrorist attack."
    Reuters is the most self-righteous about it, but many other news organizations also use terms like militants, commandos, guerrillas and even dissidents to refer to terrorists--even though in some cases these terms are not only overly solicitous to the enemy but factually inaccurate (a guerrilla attack, for instance, has a military target, while a terrorist attack targets civilians).

  6. What is funny is, there are people who believe that those doctored reporting, is genuine unbiased news.

    And they go bellyaching about how the foreigners (western and Middle east) hate us. Well, DUH! OF course! After you have been feeding on everyday your whole life!!! Of course you would believe the you have been feeding on is for real.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. natadrol any side affects to speak of?
    By gymboyjb717 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-30-2010, 05:41 PM
  2. McCain's Claims of "Media Bias": Truth or Tactic?
    By BodyWizard in forum Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-09-2008, 10:38 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-04-2006, 07:32 PM
  4. Final stage of planning cycle
    By DuiLee in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-22-2005, 01:42 PM
  5. Speaking of scam supplements....
    By T-Bar in forum General Chat
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-15-2003, 11:42 AM
Log in
Log in