BigVrunga said:Invalid Link Removed
Check out the video on the cnn front page too.
Nice to see someone can think on their own. I just got robbed in NC, but Id move there to vote for this guy
BV
See all those cars lined up to get that gas? If every filling station in the country lowered prices that's what would happen everywhere and we'd end up with no frigging gas. Just like if we have a blackout during a heatwave if you don't let the prices of ice rise to meet the increased demand the first lucky group of people who get to the store will buy it all up at the old low price and use it all for themselves, to keep themselves cool, to cool their coke, to cool their beer and food and keep their meat from spoiling. Whereas if the prices go up to 5 dollars a bag instead of a buck, people will be less likely to buy it all up and use it for less economical purposes. So instead of buying ten bags of ice and throwing the entire contents of their fridge in the tub with the ice to keep it cool people would be much more likely to buy fewer bags and use them for more critical purposes. Such as buying one, or buying it on an as needed basis just to keep their meat and milk cool. Hey presto, the market in action! Automatic rationing through rational decision making! And we didn't even need the government or a moronic politician from North Carolina to tell us how to do it...
Automatic rationing through rational decision making! And we didn't even need the government or a moronic politician from North Carolina to tell us how to do it...
God save the republic if a con artist like that is the hope of salvation for this democracy. He is a con artist, b/c he is practically lying to the voters.
BigVrunga said:Still, he'll get mad votes for doing what he's doing.
Partially agree CDB, but most of the American public can't make rational decisions for themselves. Or, at least the government and a bunch of PTA groups think they can't. Kevin Federline is headlining the teen choice awards for christs sake.
BV
A rational decision in economics is simply a purposeful action. Rain dancing is a rational decision because it has purpose, even though most people would consider it irrational in the colloquial sense. People need to seriously realize that they play a key role in setting prices and if they want them to go down they will either use less gasoline or get the government to remove some of the pretty massive impediments making the demand for gas inflexible. When you do the latter the price will go up, prices never fall in the inflexible range of the demand schedule because consumers are not responsive to price changes in that range. If a company can cut their costs by cutting back on production and raise prices not take a massive hit in total revenue or profit they will, it's what companies do every day on the market and it's predictable. You want to lower costs, you get the government out of the industry so it stops crippling competition, get them out of the industry so they stop increasing regulations making gas as a good less and less interchangable, because the more alternative brands the more flexible the industry demand and the lower the price. Even if some mad CEO took over Pepridge Farm and decided their bread should sell for a $100 a loaf the market wouldn't support that move because the alternatives available make such a price hike impossible to sustain, and puts to rest the idea that CEOs just 'set' prices as they feel for whatever assumed benign or evil reasons. And lastly, you get the government out of the business of restricting supply by stopping exploration and drilling. More supply, lower prices.
In all seriousness, high oil price is a good thing. It will reduce consumption, provide incentive to invest and develop alternative energy sources. None of that would be feasible if oil price is low. High gas prices will bite deeper and deeper and soon, people will get fed up with this. If we get low oil prices again, then it would all be for naught and we'll be right back to our wasteful consumption way.
BigVrunga said:...he'd see to it that the consumer was treated fairly.