For those of you left wondering about 9/11....

Page 1 of 7 123 ... Last
  1. For those of you left wondering about 9/11....


    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...q=loose+change

    I am a conservative but DAMN did this video make me THINK!!!!! It is an 1 hour 20 mins. long but it is a GREAT video to watch that gets better and better as time goes on.
    PharmD


  2. Good find bro. My roomate & me are watching it now as I write this.
    •   
       


  3. basically it just rounds up everything most people already know. I mean the people who care to know. It's a good video.

  4. entertaining, but those reports.. well .. most were already debunked.

    people just don't want to understand that it was a handfull of islamists that flew a plane into a building.... its not that hard to do.


    but yet.. i am one who doesn't think oswald killed JFK so.. we all fall into the theories.. they are more romantic

  5. not really debunked....just a government official saying what "really" happened. im a firm believer that something is definitely being hidden from us. i have debated to people till i was blue in the face. guys, there is scientific evidence, eye witness accounts, etc etc bla bla bla. you seen it in the video. research it yourself, i did on alot of things they touched in the video. it makes sense and all the pieces fit together. you cant agrue scientific evidence, you cannot. simple as that. too many people are close-minded, if you would just think and put two and two together, you would see a different side of it.
    •   
       


  6. LMAO! Sounds like prepubescent Oliver Stone.

    Where are the Men in Black?


    Oh god....that is just funny.
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.

  7. I will tell ya though. The thing that absolutely got me on this was the video of the plane hitting the pentagon. That was NOT 757!!! You could see that it wasn't, it is impossible that it was. Plus there is no way a 757 could have hit the side of the building like that with such little damage.

    I don't know if you watched the whole video Bobo, the beginning is pretty boring and slow but the facts brought up from the Pentagon crash was quite compelling.

    I am not saying I believe it but it raises SERIOUS doubts.
    PharmD

  8. one would think that the center of the United States military would be built a little stronger than most other buildings. I think people should do more research on how a structure like that stands up to force due to either what it was build with and how the shape takes in pressure...

  9. Quote Originally Posted by LakeMountD
    I will tell ya though. The thing that absolutely got me on this was the video of the plane hitting the pentagon. That was NOT 757!!! You could see that it wasn't, it is impossible that it was. Plus there is no way a 757 could have hit the side of the building like that with such little damage.

    I don't know if you watched the whole video Bobo, the beginning is pretty boring and slow but the facts brought up from the Pentagon crash was quite compelling.

    I am not saying I believe it but it raises SERIOUS doubts.
    Bro, this is propaganda at its finest. I wouldn't believe one thing in this video. He contradicts himself a million times then takes various assumptions as proof of a grand conspiracy.

    Did the gov. hide something? Probably. Anytime national security is threatened its a complete lockdown.


    Sorry, you don't creat an entire video based on context then sell T-Shirts on your website. Give me a break.

    The number of points you could pick apart in thie video is too many to count.

    I watched it all. The Pentagon "facts" arne't facts at all.

    Generally when a plane crashes its wings get ripped right off and it becomes a missile. Wings are lightweight compared to reinforced concrete. THe guy on the video says the hole was only 16ft wide.

    EDIT: I figured he was talking about the aftermath which isn't even close to 16ft. Even so, read the link below. The actualy hole before everything collapsed should be around 13-16ft according th the specs of a 757.

    Take a look. He's lying.
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.

  10. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html


    Read.



    "This photo taken just minutes after the explosion clearly shows the right wing impact hole and some depth inside of it. The right edge of the center hole is again at column 15 and the uprooted support columns 15, 16, and 17."
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.

  11. ok, flight 93, several people made successful calls from their cell phones, at the time flying at the average height of 32000 feet. several studies after the fact were conducted to test the odds of those cell phone calls actually occurring. 0.006 percent. not likely. and the funny thing about that is after that occurrence, airlines installed state of the art cell phone "technology" to help cellphones aboard the planes get better signals and service. why do that if they already worked so well? hmmm.....the billions of dollars of gold being transported out of the towers in underground tunnels on transport trucks. if that is true, which i dont know, then they obviously knew the towers would be struck and collapse. not to mention the billions of dollars in stocks alone being "cashed out" before anything occured. bush's brother collecting billions in insurance from the towers.....the list goes on. also, many people believe the towers were rigged to blow up in a controlled detonation. im not sure about that, but why would the hundreds of firemen in the building report of many many explosions occuring before the towers came down?? why would they lie? how is it that the support beams at the lower level of the building turned to molten steel, when the hottest part of the fire was obviously at top? you would have to double the temp. of the main fire to cause the steel beams to melt the way they did. alot of things dont make sense.... it sounds crazy to believe, but common sense would tell you otherwise.

  12. That first picture though was after the roof collapsed, the hole was much smaller... But again the main and really only important thing I saw was the fact that there is no way in that video that it was a 757. IN THAT VIDEO, not saying in general. There are more videos out there but 100% in that video you can tell that is no 757, they are huge.
    PharmD

  13. heres an even better question for you. WHY THE HELL WOULD OUR OWN COUNTRY KILL THOUSANDS OF OUR OWN PEOPLE?! MONEY?! Bull****! Seriously this is one farfetched conspirecy theory, my god I cant even believe it. You said put two and two together, yea you get four when you do that, not 5 which is what this theory would be. In reality this crap theory does not add up to actual reports.

  14. Another thing, it is always so easy to believe these things when you just watch these kind of videos. How many of you have actually looked for videos that are out there specifically to disprove this theory? I'm guessing they are out there and I bet there evidence is even more compelling.

    Also I have my own theory now. The world trade centers were planned to come down even before they were ever made. It was a GRAND conspiricy from the beginning to rally our country together. I have so much compelling evidence too. If this theory wasn't true, than how come when I fold a $20 bill the right way, the trade center is on fire? See I got proof of my conspiricy too. (Just poking fun now).

  15. Quote Originally Posted by Salyers1121
    ok, flight 93, several people made successful calls from their cell phones, at the time flying at the average height of 32000 feet. several studies after the fact were conducted to test the odds of those cell phone calls actually occurring. 0.006 percent. not likely. and the funny thing about that is after that occurrence, airlines installed state of the art cell phone "technology" to help cellphones aboard the planes get better signals and service. why do that if they already worked so well? hmmm.....the billions of dollars of gold being transported out of the towers in underground tunnels on transport trucks. if that is true, which i dont know, then they obviously knew the towers would be struck and collapse. not to mention the billions of dollars in stocks alone being "cashed out" before anything occured. bush's brother collecting billions in insurance from the towers.....the list goes on. also, many people believe the towers were rigged to blow up in a controlled detonation. im not sure about that, but why would the hundreds of firemen in the building report of many many explosions occuring before the towers came down?? why would they lie? how is it that the support beams at the lower level of the building turned to molten steel, when the hottest part of the fire was obviously at top? you would have to double the temp. of the main fire to cause the steel beams to melt the way they did. alot of things dont make sense.... it sounds crazy to believe, but common sense would tell you otherwise.

    people can call out just fine in airplanes.. try it for yourself and you will disprove their claim.

    also when a building catches on fire, and fire spreads.. parts and areas of that building may have things in it that are highly dangerous if put next to a flame... secondary explosions are prob. such said things.

    As for the towers falling in a "controlled" way. Sure they did.. but that is what happens when you have a very cheap, light, building that is introduced to very very high levels of heat. it melts.. down...

  16. Quote Originally Posted by snakebyte05
    heres an even better question for you. WHY THE HELL WOULD OUR OWN COUNTRY KILL THOUSANDS OF OUR OWN PEOPLE?! MONEY?! Bull****! Seriously this is one farfetched conspirecy theory, my god I cant even believe it. You said put two and two together, yea you get four when you do that, not 5 which is what this theory would be. In reality this crap theory does not add up to actual reports.
    The reason is the same that Mcnamara gave in his report that was mentioned in the early part of the video-to give us a reason to get involved in a war that would be unpopular here an abroad. The same reason some people believe that pearl harbor was allowed to happen. Most people don't want to believe our government would ever do anything like this, but the fact is we have done worse in the history of our country. Whether or not you believe in the so called conspiracies, there are TONS of facts out there that simply do not add up with the governments official story. This is not the first or only video of it's kind. I'm as sceptical a person as anyone, and a Marine, but there is no way that I believe it happened the way the government says.

  17. Quote Originally Posted by MaynardMeek
    people can call out just fine in airplanes.. try it for yourself and you will disprove their claim.

    also when a building catches on fire, and fire spreads.. parts and areas of that building may have things in it that are highly dangerous if put next to a flame... secondary explosions are prob. such said things.

    As for the towers falling in a "controlled" way. Sure they did.. but that is what happens when you have a very cheap, light, building that is introduced to very very high levels of heat. it melts.. down...

    Name one other building in the history of modern architecture that collapsed that fast, in such a controlled manner, from fire damage. The owner of building(edit- forgot what the correct number was. It was a smaller building nearby) was recorded on pbs saying that they PULLED it, which is a term for controlled detonation. He later retracted his story, but made out like a bandit from his insurance claim.

    edit-sorry, I'm being redundant here, I just watched more of that movie and some of this was mentioned.

  18. Quote Originally Posted by jarhead
    The reason is the same that Mcnamara gave in his report that was mentioned in the early part of the video-to give us a reason to get involved in a war that would be unpopular here an abroad. The same reason some people believe that pearl harbor was allowed to happen. Most people don't want to believe our government would ever do anything like this, but the fact is we have done worse in the history of our country. Whether or not you believe in the so called conspiracies, there are TONS of facts out there that simply do not add up with the governments official story. This is not the first or only video of it's kind. I'm as sceptical a person as anyone, and a Marine, but there is no way that I believe it happened the way the government says.

    One thing I will agree with is there are some things that add up. But I also do not believe this is a grand conspiracy from our government. What happened to all the people on the plan than. They just decide to kill them in that NASA building or what? There are things that are fishy about it, I just do not agree that it happened the way that video or most out there say it happened.

  19. Quote Originally Posted by snakebyte05
    One thing I will agree with is there are some things that add up. But I also do not believe this is a grand conspiracy from our government. What happened to all the people on the plan than. They just decide to kill them in that NASA building or what? There are things that are fishy about it, I just do not agree that it happened the way that video or most out there say it happened.

    All of the videos out there like this are just theories when it's all said and done. I'm trying not to look at it being a huge conspiracy, but just that the governments story is the one that is the hardest to believe. If they have nothing to hide, they could have done a better job to placate the minds of people wanting answers. But they don't have to-they're the government.

    The problem is if you look at either side long enough, you canstart to believe either story. Unfortunately, it's highly unlikely we will ever know 100% what really happened.

  20. Quote Originally Posted by jarhead
    All of the videos out there like this are just theories when it's all said and done. I'm trying not to look at it being a huge conspiracy, but just that the governments story is the one that is the hardest to believe. If they have nothing to hide, they could have done a better job to placate the minds of people wanting answers. But they don't have to-they're the government.

    The problem is if you look at either side long enough, you canstart to believe either story. Unfortunately, it's highly unlikely we will ever know 100% what really happened.
    quoted for the truth, he is absolutely right. we will never know. maybe when our generation is dead and gone, things will finally leak to the surface. but till then all we can do is ask questions and have opinions. and i have stated mine. and yes, i do think the government is fully capable of doing something of this magnitude. whats stopping them? they had toooooo much to gain from it. end of my rant, i have stated my piece.

  21. Quote Originally Posted by MaynardMeek
    people can call out just fine in airplanes.. try it for yourself and you will disprove their claim.

    also when a building catches on fire, and fire spreads.. parts and areas of that building may have things in it that are highly dangerous if put next to a flame... secondary explosions are prob. such said things.

    As for the towers falling in a "controlled" way. Sure they did.. but that is what happens when you have a very cheap, light, building that is introduced to very very high levels of heat. it melts.. down...
    the building itself was designed to withstand extremely strong winds, hurricanes, bombs and explosions, and yes, even to survive a plane crash. all of those possibilites were looked at when designing the towers. in the past, extremely large buildings have also caught on fire, and burned for more than 24 hours, and never collapsed. the towers burned for 56 min. and both fell. hmmmmm. man, i can go all day with this. there are too many things.
    and the other explosions......according to those firefighters, there were many many other explosions on several different floors BEFORE it collapsed and on floors where the fire hasnt spread too. there are hundreds of eyewitness accounts of the other explosions. i doubt everyone is lying.

  22. I think the purpose of this video is to raise questions. Of course, it is powerful propaganda and who know's how much truth it hold. But if anything is for certain, it's that a lot of this sh!t just don't add up.

    For example, the explosions in the Towers, the other building that collapsed in the other perfectly control manner, the stock actions, the timing of his insurance policy and what he covered his towers for, why the block boxes weren't retrieved, why hasn't the insider trading been investigated deeper, Why isn't there more video of what happened to the Pentagon being released, why the hell were the hostages phone calls so secretive and so damn strange....just a few. The government is hiding a LOT and of course this is expected but seriously, if you can sit there and eat up everything that the government has told us about 9-11, you're just as dumb as the next person. I'm not saying to go believe this video but rather start asking questions.

  23. I was given this and "In Plane Site" on DVD Mon. but haven`t watched these yet. This weekend maybe.

    http://www.911inplanesite.com/

  24. The Bush Administration is full of scum but I don't believe they helped the crashes in any way.

    I'm a Civil Engineer so I've done all kinds of problems where it could result in whats going on. A small nick could very well be the fracture point and that doesn't have to be the point of impact.

    With a plane going thousands of pounds per inch in a compressive load, in a certain direction, it produces pressure and a torque, since its unlikely the impact was a perfect angle. Odds are it twisted the bar. If there was a weak spot...anywhere, it would break there.

    I've done many labs where we did a load on one side and it fractured near the other side.

    The fact that there was fire definitely could defeat the "plane crash." I doubt the Engineers took into account the temperatures accurately. If its hotter than anticipated, the building is going to fall.

    I could ramble on about this but I don't really believe the theories.

  25. Then how do you explain the other building across the street that was demolished in the same exact manner?

    Seeing the explosions happening in slow-motion, hearing testimonials of people hearing and seeing explosions, it recording as a 2.1 on the rictor scale....all so damn fishy.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-06-2013, 09:32 PM
  2. Storage of LR3 IGF-1 for those of you wondering.
    By LakeMountD in forum IGF-1/GH
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-18-2006, 05:22 PM
  3. For those of you with questions about NO supplements
    By str8flexed in forum Supplements
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-25-2005, 09:25 PM
  4. For those of you who take Serzone for depression...
    By windwords7 in forum General Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-17-2003, 02:45 AM
  5. For those of you with Windows XP...
    By Sheesh in forum General Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-23-2003, 05:49 PM
Log in
Log in