Bro, this is propaganda at its finest. I wouldn't believe one thing in this video. He contradicts himself a million times then takes various assumptions as proof of a grand conspiracy.
The reason is the same that Mcnamara gave in his report that was mentioned in the early part of the video-to give us a reason to get involved in a war that would be unpopular here an abroad. The same reason some people believe that pearl harbor was allowed to happen. Most people don't want to believe our government would ever do anything like this, but the fact is we have done worse in the history of our country. Whether or not you believe in the so called conspiracies, there are TONS of facts out there that simply do not add up with the governments official story. This is not the first or only video of it's kind. I'm as sceptical a person as anyone, and a Marine, but there is no way that I believe it happened the way the government says.
quoted for the truth, he is absolutely right. we will never know. maybe when our generation is dead and gone, things will finally leak to the surface. but till then all we can do is ask questions and have opinions. and i have stated mine. and yes, i do think the government is fully capable of doing something of this magnitude. whats stopping them? they had toooooo much to gain from it. end of my rant, i have stated my piece.
:frustrate the building itself was designed to withstand extremely strong winds, hurricanes, bombs and explosions, and yes, even to survive a plane crash. all of those possibilites were looked at when designing the towers. in the past, extremely large buildings have also caught on fire, and burned for more than 24 hours, and never collapsed. the towers burned for 56 min. and both fell. hmmmmm. man, i can go all day with this. there are too many things.
In what video? The REAL photos are right in that link along with others.. WHo cares what they had in some simulation video. The hole measures up to what it should be with a 757. The main and really only important point is you shouldn't shouldn't believe what some ****ups with an agenda want you to believe who will butcher facts and ignore anything that goes against ther arguement. They aren't interested in the truth, they are only interest in pushing their anti-government, anti-authority viewpoints.
Wrong. Please read the link on the first page about how the Pentagon is contructed.
And he's wrong again. 3000 degrees is what it takes to MELT steel, as in completely liquifiy, not weaken it to the point it can't support the floors anymore. You don't have to melt steel for it to loos its load bearing capacity. Its a classic exmaple of taking things out of contexnt and wrapping it in a nice little package so it looks like what he is saying is true. It BS, pure an simple.
You are part of the conspiracy. Fess up.
I never said this was fact, I was just pointing out that he contradicted himself and according to what he said it would make it possible for the plane to be destroyed in the crash. I dont agree with the video in any way, not sure why you think I do. Either way, I see this movie as something michael Moore would do. Complete bull**** that looks real.
I think his point was that jet fuel only burns at 1100 degrees and will burn hotter than anything it could come into contact with. Having worked in the airwing in the marine corps, I also know that it burns quickly. For it to sustain the temperatures to melt the titanium in the fuselage or steel, it would have had to have more jet fuel or some other fuel that would burn hotter, longer. It is essentially as the video states, kerosene. There are experts that are not associated with these conspiracies that have said that it is improbable if not imposssible for jet fuel to raise the temperature enough to bend steel let alone vaporize titanium. What is unlikely is that the relatively small structural damage from the impact into the wtc and resulting fires caused a collapse. What is easily explainable is that they collapsed from a controlled detonation. also Add in the fact that the " pancake theory" makes no sense scientifically since the buildings basically fell at freefall speed, and you've got the makings of a conspiracy.
Ok guesss i was mistaken.
I think this video raises some interesting questions regardless of why, or by whom you think these attacks were orchestrated. Besides what we have discussed there are so many other questions.
Empire state building was hit, did not come close to falling. A b-25 hit in july of 1945 , killing 14 people but did not compromise the integrity of the building.
The questions come in when they expect you to believe that a 757 skidded off the grass and punched thru over 9 feet of steel enforced concrete, leaving behind an almost perfect circle and little debris. Planes do not disappear to that extent when they crash no matter what they hit. These aren't all conspiracy theory whackos that question these things. There have been victims family members, and people simply wanting accountability from their government that have come foward as well.
And there are experts that say it reacted exactly how is should have.
Sorry, b-25 isn't exaclty a fully fueled 757 travelling twice as fast.
Do you purposely ignore the links and pictures show here?
There is a difference in questioning and blaming the government for a grand conspiracy.
Of course it looks real. They have to sell T-Shirts and videos to finance their anti-Bush, anti-government agenda.
:goodpost: :clap2:
first here's a link of my own. The website is decidedly anti-war but the author of the article is as credible as the one in the link you provided.Written by Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term, he was also director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, not a whacko.http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.htmlThere is a difference in questioning and blaming the government for a grand conspiracy.
We don't know all the facts since none of us are strcutural engineers nor in the intelligence community therefore it was a gov. conspriacy to fool us all.
Sounds like whacko's to me.
They want accountability? Go talk to Osama. I guess the USS Cole and the 1993 WORLD TRADE CETNER bombing was all a conspriacy as well. I guess the failed putting enough explosaives in there in 93 so they had to run some planes into it then time it to make it look more authentic.
lol, i thought there was a conspiracy with Katrina.....? how they blew up damns or levies near New Orleans which caused the water to flood the city killing hundreds of people rather than it flood oil companies out there. something along those lines. dont quote me, im just talking out of my ass, but i do believe someone told me that.
