Animal rights people out of controll
- 09-02-2005, 10:53 AM
- 09-02-2005, 11:14 AM
Everybody is entitled to their opinion and a joke is a joke, and meant to make people laugh. I personally dont think this is funny...and you are out of line.
IMO - youre offending more people than you are making laugh.
If you truly believe what youre saying here...I only wish your mother and father felt the same way you do. This is not a flame here. Personally I have 4 children of my own, and I would die on the spot for any one of them. But thats just my choice.
no reply to this is needed. and to flame each other would be a waste of time. we can just agree to disagree.
09-02-2005, 11:54 AM
Oh now who's being silly.Originally Posted by AGELESS
Not everyone laughs at dark humor so you are entitled to your distaste. This was something along the lines of "A Modest Proposal." A lot of folks mistakenly thought that Swift was actually being truthful. Then again, a lot of people thought Gulliver's Travels was a factual account as well.
To clarify because some didn't get the sarcasm, it would absolutely ridiculous to say babies should be "abortable" up until birth. My real opinion is that once a baby reaches the point where it could actually be delivered (prematurely) and survive, it should only be legal to abort it under these circumstances:
1) It is dead or dieing anyway
2) It is risking the life of the mother
09-02-2005, 12:13 PM
I didn't really find your humor funny, so I chose to ignore it. For those unfamiliar with A Modest Proposal, here's a little info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal
As for the other argument, I saw that you were being sarcastic, particularly when you mentioned aborting already born children (which I would call retroactive abortion). I just love to argue.
09-02-2005, 01:41 PM
It's an interesting issue. For me it always comes down to self sovereingty. Not just for women, but for anyone their body is their property and they are the final word on wha goes on in there, whether it's to carry a baby to term, to use recreational drugs, to get implants, to use steroids, whatever. The issue of abortion is more charged because it's very arguable that an innocent life is about to be harmed by the actions of another. It really comes down to whether or not a woman should have the option to essentially evict the fetus from her body even if it means certain death for the fetus. Some people are hardcore property rights people who would say yes, some are more swayed by the moral, ethical and legal problems they see in the situation because, whether the mother has the right or not is basically contingent on whether or not her exercising that right will adversly affect someone else's right to do the same. To put it another way, suppose the kid 'wants' to live and we just have no way of asking him. It all hinges on the legal status of the fetus it seems. Personally I find abortion disgusting, especially late term abortions, but I wouldn't interfere with most current laws as they seem to strike a happy medium between both points of view: choice to a reasonable point.
Similar Forum Threads
- By IronMarc in forum Nutrition / HealthReplies: 28Last Post: 06-14-2013, 06:45 PM
- By freqfly in forum General ChatReplies: 5Last Post: 10-18-2007, 04:43 PM
- By BigJimCalhoun in forum Male Anti-Aging MedicineReplies: 51Last Post: 07-18-2007, 02:14 PM
- By bigSMokey in forum PoliticsReplies: 2Last Post: 05-03-2007, 06:29 PM
- By Fun2Train in forum Nutrition / HealthReplies: 8Last Post: 01-29-2007, 05:27 PM