whatever man. there is just as much scientific proof in evolution that there is in creationism.
What religion said that the sun orbited the earth?
If you don't know something as basic as that, you really shouldn't be arguing these points- your ignorance is showing. You seem know neither science nor religion.
Here, go learn ya sonething:
http://galileo.rice.edu/bio/narrative_7.html
Creationism or Evolution will never be scientificaly proven.
Neither will Newton's laws of thermodynamics, but that doesn't change the fact that they are almost uniformly accepted in the scientific community, save for the occasional crackpot who tries to make a perpetual motion machine, or religious fanatic who insists that God can break the physical laws.
Leave the science to the scientists and the religion to the theologists. Creationism is not a scientific theory any more than the teracentric view of the universe is.
Seperation of the church and the state was designed to keep the state out of the church not the other way around.
That's what the wing-nuts have been saying of late. You certainally have been exposed to their propaganda.
If it weren't for propaganda, a lot of people would be completely ignorant, I guess, but I recommend getting a real education.
Let me explain to you are incorrect- the seperation is two way, not just one-way. Actually, Thomas Jefferson can do a better job that I can, so I will quote him:
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
"Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. State churches that use government power to support themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of the church tends to make the clergy unresponsive to the people and leads to corruption within religion. Erecting the "wall of separation between church and state," therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.[/font]"
--------------------------------
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
"Our Constitution ... has not left the religion of its citizens under the power of its public functionaries, were it possible that any of these should consider a conquest over the conscience of men either attainable or applicable to any desirable purpose.[/font]"
-------------------------------------
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
"Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law.[/font]"
-------------------------------------
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
"In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own. It is easier to acquire wealth and power by this combination than by deserving them, and to effect this, they have perverted the purest religion ever preached to man into mystery and jargon, unintelligible to all mankind, and therefore the safer engine for their purposes.[/font]"
------------------------------------
Then there this letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush, an excerpt of which is chisled into the Jefferson Memorial. Look at it context- he's referring to the church!
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
"[/font][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
I promised you a letter on Christianity, which I have not forgotten. On the contrary, it is because I have reflected on it, that I find much more time necessary for it than I can at present dispose of. I have a view of the subject which ought to displease neither the rational Christian nor Deists, and would reconcile many to a character they have too hastily rejected. I do not know that it would reconcile the genus irritabile vatum who are all in arms against me. Their hostility is on too interesting ground to be softened. The delusion into which the X.Y.Z. plot shewed it possible to push the people; the successful experiment made under the prevalence of that delusion on the clause of the constitution, which, while it secured the freedom of the press, covered also the freedom of religion, had given to the clergy a very favorite hope of obtaining an establishment of a particular form of Christianity thro' the U.S.; and as every sect believes its own form the true one, every one perhaps hoped for his own, but especially the Episcopalians & Congregationalists. The returning good sense of our country threatens abortion to their hopes, & they believe that any portion of power confided to me, will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. And they believe rightly; for I have sworn upon the altar of god,eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. But this is all they have to fear from me: & enough too in their opinion, & this is the cause of their printing lying pamphlets against me, forging conversations for me with Mazzei, Bishop Madison, &c., which are absolute falsehoods without a circumstance of truth to rest on; falsehoods, too, of which I acquit Mazzei & Bishop Madison, for they are men of truth.[/font]"
-------------------------------------
"[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
The priests of the different religious sects ... dread the advance of science as witches do the approach of daylight, and scowl on the fatal harbinger announcing the subdivision of the duperies on which they live."[/font]
--------------------------------------
There's another source, a bit more official that discusses the Church/State issue, the Treaty of Tripoli (with the "Musselmen"), penned and signed in 1796, during Washington's administration. It states:
[font=Book Antiqua, Palantino]
"As the Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion..."[/font]
It was ratified by the Senate in 1797. There wasn't the slightest debate over this passage.
So basically the people telling you the First Amendment was not intended to keep religion out of government are lying to you. I recommend you vote these liars out of office and stop going to their churches.