Election of 2012....Who ya got?

Page 1 of 41 123 ... Last
  1. Election of 2012....Who ya got?


    Ok guys, figured I would get us started early. With the Iowa Straw poll just yesterday, it seems that election/campaign season is strongly underway. With that said, who do you think will opposed Obama in 2012, and who do you think with be out C.I.C? Also, who would you want if you had your choice?

    If I had to place a wager now, I think Rick Perry will get the GOP nod, and probably lose to Obama in 2012.

    Out of those 2 choice, we are going in the wrong direction IMO regardless.

    If I had my druthers, I like Huntsman's more common sense approach, but he will not get any serious attention.

    So lets here it folks


  2. ::Grabs Popcorn::
    •   
       


  3. The GOP debates will be funny / disturbing enough that's for sure. Still though like you said who ever wins in the end we lose.

  4. Obama is very vulnerable, but Republicans can't win with who they will probably nominate. If they nominate Perry they lose (religious nuts don't play well in generals), if they nominate Bachmann they lose (see Perry quote, plus she's nuts), if they nominate Romney they lose (far right hates him).

    A moderate would have a real good shot I'd think, but I don't see it happening. Obama wins (imo) because the other side runs someone polarizing enough to scare the middle and the Dems into action.

    As for who I hope wins, Ron Paul of course. But that has no chance of happening.

  5. Name:  The-Douche-and-The-Turd.jpg
Views: 233
Size:  19.8 KB
    M.Ed. Ex Phys


  6. Politics is a game about winning. Who stands a chance against Obama? I like a lot of the candidates answers and solutions but, even if I like the person, I want Obama out and I only see one person who can beat him. Why spend so much time and money on who will just lose? I believe Herman Cain is the only one who can beat Obama. I like Cain and his idea's. He's a business man and more in touch with most Americans, IMHO.
    94% of Black voters voted for Obama. If it were 85% I wouldn't believe they voted according to race but they did. Obama's parents weren't Americans. His mom wasn't from America. His Dad was from Kenya. His value's aren't American.

    Herman Cain is Born and raised in America with the same cultural heritage as most of the Black AND White population. Obama is the opposite. Maybe Cain can teach people that the Republican party is not the "white" party, but the party for equality.

    Color aside, I like what he stands for and he isn't a career politician.

  7. Obama is vulnerable, yes. I think he has more disappointment then approval. Hell, the rest of the world sees him as a push over and we don't think he can get anything done. But he is a strong standout representative for the democratic opinion. But he gets nothing from me... how dare you take down the American flag from the oval office to be replaced with a middle eastern nation's. You, sir, are not the leader of my country.

    With that being said, the republic party has NO face. There's too many potential people and not enogh backing to a single name. If I HAD to pick, Romney. Of course, we'd all love to see Ron Paul make waves but it just won't happen. The GOP is too scatterbrained to form a tangible front to take on the President.
    For me, it's not the "better candidate" rather than "the lesser of two evils." What we need is a moderate, someone to stop all this ripping at the seames. The problem is were so far gone into radical/progressive politics somone halfway will never get the chance.

    *Sigh* it's gonna be an interesting year. RawStrength, pass that popcorn.
    By believing passionately in something that still does not exist, we create it. The nonexistent is whatever we have not sufficiently desired.
    Franz Kafka
  8. Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by seccsi View Post
    Obama is very vulnerable, but Republicans can't win with who they will probably nominate. If they nominate Perry they lose (religious nuts don't play well in generals), if they nominate Bachmann they lose (see Perry quote, plus she's nuts), if they nominate Romney they lose (far right hates him).

    A moderate would have a real good shot I'd think, but I don't see it happening. Obama wins (imo) because the other side runs someone polarizing enough to scare the middle and the Dems into action.

    As for who I hope wins, Ron Paul of course. But that has no chance of happening.
    Overall this is more or less my stance, although Romney i'd say has more of a chance than Bachman or Perry. Ron Paul or Herman Cain would be my first choices, and at least Ron did well in the straw poll, so theres some hope.

    but Rodja has it right on the nose (hopefully i'm not the only one who knows that reference offhand )
    Animis Rep
    facebook.com/xAnimis
    animis.org/forum

  9. Herman Cain. . .

    but nothing is going to change, except the 'change' Obama was talking about - which is tearing apart this country.

    outside of the economy, debt, freedoms in danger, etc. that is wrong with this country, I would only vote for a leader who will stand for Israel.
  10. Administrator
    Admin's Avatar

    Name:  Chris-Christie-Pointing.jpg
Views: 206
Size:  39.6 KB



    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
    •   
       


  11. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    Overall this is more or less my stance, although Romney i'd say has more of a chance than Bachman or Perry. Ron Paul or Herman Cain would be my first choices, and at least Ron did well in the straw poll, so theres some hope.

    but Rodja has it right on the nose (hopefully i'm not the only one who knows that reference offhand )
    Perry and Bachman are a tad scary, when they start preaching. Or in Perry's case, leading a prayer service.

    Romney has the look and sound of a president, I just dont know if the right is galvanized behind him.

    Cain has already had a few off the wall things to say, and as much as there are certain things about Paul I like, he is a little too cooky for me.

  12. Quote Originally Posted by Admin View Post
    Name:  Chris-Christie-Pointing.jpg
Views: 206
Size:  39.6 KB


    You cant be serious. Watch out to all public employees nationwide. Stay Puft is on the way
  13. Administrator
    Admin's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by AE14 View Post


    You cant be serious. Watch out to all public employees nationwide. Stay Puft is on the way

    Absolutely serious....and nobody in their right mind would think any union of any kind would vote Republican anyway.



    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  14. Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by AE14 View Post


    You cant be serious. Watch out to all public employees nationwide. Stay Puft is on the way
    Not knocking you personally but think of the quality of service you've received from public employees vs similar people in private industry. Do you think for that they deserve higher pay, more days off, basically free health care, and non contributory pensions after 20 years? I sure don't.
    Animis Rep
    facebook.com/xAnimis
    animis.org/forum
  15. Administrator
    Admin's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    Not knocking you personally but think of the quality of service you've received from public employees vs similar people in private industry. Do you think for that they deserve higher pay, more days off, basically free health care, and non contributory pensions after 20 years? I sure don't.
    Neither does most of the country...


    Wisconsin just proved that....in a traditionally progressive state, their recall grabbed only 2 seats after the **** storm that governor got over the exact same issues.



    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.

  16. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL View Post
    Not knocking you personally but think of the quality of service you've received from public employees vs similar people in private industry. Do you think for that they deserve higher pay, more days off, basically free health care, and non contributory pensions after 20 years? I sure don't.
    I dont disagree....too a point. However, he has made them the villain when that is most certainly not the case. You and I both know the issues in NJ are far deeper than public sector. Christie just refuses to make any waves with the people that helped him get elected. He is also another one (like all politicians btw) that lie through their teeth on the campaign trail. Look for what he said about educators on the campaign trail. Too funny (and hypocritical)

    As an aside, with my new job, I have seen first hand what his new legislation is doing to "free" benefits. Yikes
  17. Administrator
    Admin's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by AE14 View Post
    I dont disagree....too a point. However, he has made them the villain when that is most certainly not the case. You and I both know the issues in NJ are far deeper than public sector. Christie just refuses to make any waves with the people that helped him get elected. He is also another one (like all politicians btw) that lie through their teeth on the campaign trail. Look for what he said about educators on the campaign trail. Too funny (and hypocritical)

    As an aside, with my new job, I have seen first hand what his new legislation is doing to "free" benefits. Yikes
    No, he made the unions the villiain.....the unions then tried to cast that as Christie making the teachers the villain.



    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  18. Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by AE14 View Post
    I dont disagree....too a point. However, he has made them the villain when that is most certainly not the case. You and I both know the issues in NJ are far deeper than public sector. Christie just refuses to make any waves with the people that helped him get elected. He is also another one (like all politicians btw) that lie through their teeth on the campaign trail. Look for what he said about educators on the campaign trail. Too funny (and hypocritical)

    As an aside, with my new job, I have seen first hand what his new legislation is doing to "free" benefits. Yikes
    I dunno, as with the teachers union I feel they are the villians to an extent. Maybe not the largest but still it needs to be dealt with permanently. I'm sill supportive of the right for workers to bargain collectively, but at this point unions are just a big special interest political group. Particularly in the public sector, I don't feel they should be able to hold the state over a barrel on excessive benefits and no firing policies. Again, my favorite example being the Hawaii public school system.
    Animis Rep
    facebook.com/xAnimis
    animis.org/forum

  19. Quote Originally Posted by Admin View Post
    No, he made the unions the villiain.....the unions then tried to cast that as Christie making the teachers the villain.
    thats just not true. Christie specifically targeted educators and used them in his speeches. Do you remember the "drug mule" commentary?

    At the end of the day, he is a fairly popular rock star outside of NJ right now, but on a national scene, his bully routine will make him a flop
  20. Administrator
    Admin's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by AE14 View Post
    thats just not true. Christie specifically targeted educators and used them in his speeches. Do you remember the "drug mule" commentary?

    At the end of the day, he is a fairly popular rock star outside of NJ right now, but on a national scene, his bully routine will make him a flop
    I disagree. He tried to differentiate the two plenty of times.

    And I think his platform would be very successful....Wisconsin showed that, even though Democrats and the media tried to portray the entire state against Walker....in the end, he won....and that union fight was MUCH more public than anything NJ had.



    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.

  21. Quote Originally Posted by Admin View Post
    I disagree. He tried to differentiate the two plenty of times.

    And I think his platform would be very successful....Wisconsin showed that, even though Democrats and the media tried to portray the entire state against Walker....in the end, he won....and that union fight was MUCH more public than anything NJ had.
    I disagree. He has specifically come out and called teachers lazy and selfish. He has also gone after cops and firefighters as well. Hell....he cut cops in Newark of all places

    Walker and Christie are very different. Christie comes off as a bully. Walker is more polished (personality wise) imo

  22. does anyone really like Christie? at this point hasnt he pi$$ed off just about everyone in the state?
  23. Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by Bolanrox View Post
    does anyone really like Christie? at this point hasnt he pi$$ed off just about everyone in the state?
    Right now most states as well as the federal government are faced with choices that require pissing off everyone. Deficit spending doesn't work in the long run, someone has to pay the bill eventually.
    Animis Rep
    facebook.com/xAnimis
    animis.org/forum

  24. In my experience serving in the federal government, and attending the ****e-y public schools that I did; I'm fairly confident in saying that a good number of people enjoying their guaranteed stipend, free health care, and 30 day vacations don't hunger for advancement. THEY'RE LAZY!! lol. And every military general knows he's getting a nice comfy chair as a board member somewhere. it's a system.
  25. Administrator
    Admin's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by AE14 View Post
    I disagree. He has specifically come out and called teachers lazy and selfish. He has also gone after cops and firefighters as well. Hell....he cut cops in Newark of all places

    Walker and Christie are very different. Christie comes off as a bully. Walker is more polished (personality wise) imo

    Sometimes the truth hurts. Some ARE lazy and selfish.

    A bully is someone who picks on those less powerful.....the unions are by no means, less powerful.


    The problem unions have, especially public employee unions, is the more you complain about your benefits and having to pay more into your retirement, the rest of the population within the private sector arent even sure they can keep their job. Until they realize that, they are on the losing side.



    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.

  26. Quote Originally Posted by Admin View Post
    Sometimes the truth hurts. Some ARE lazy and selfish.

    A bully is someone who picks on those less powerful.....the unions are by no means, less powerful.


    The problem unions have, especially public employee unions, is the more you complain about your benefits and having to pay more into your retirement, the rest of the population within the private sector arent even sure they can keep their job. Until they realize that, they are on the losing side.
    I agree, SOME are lazy and selfish, the same as in the private sector. However, as you and I know, to compare public and private sector jobs is ridiculous. At the end of the day, everyone has a choice about what field they want to go in, and to purposely go after those that chose a safer situation is silly. There is greater risk/reward in the private sector. However, the reason that many of us chose private sector jobs was the idea of security, to all of a sudden reopen collective bargaining sets a bad precedent imo. Hell, when things were going well, the unions did not ask to reopen and get more did they?

    To assume that the unions have the sway as the governor and his cronies is ill advised, and his behavior is the quintessential bully routine. He looks downright foolish.

    So keeping this on target with the topic, Christie will not run in 2012, and even if he did, he would not get far. Once his financial situation comes to the forefront (as well as the helicopter to his sons baseball game) he's done.

    I am hopeful that the GOP comes up with someone of relevance that can make this a race, as I am itching to find someone to believe in. I dont think that person is there though.
  27. Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by AE14 View Post
    At the end of the day, everyone has a choice about what field they want to go in, and to purposely go after those that chose a safer situation is silly. There is greater risk/reward in the private sector. However, the reason that many of us chose private sector jobs was the idea of security, to all of a sudden reopen collective bargaining sets a bad precedent imo. Hell, when things were going well, the unions did not ask to reopen and get more did they?
    Actually when a contract was set to expire soon, the unions very much played heavy handed with extracting maximum benefit. But you are wrong, there isn't both more risk + reward in the private sector, public sector employees are higher paid by education level than private sector, and paid higher per hour worked than public sector.... so they've gotten to where they have less risk, and more reward.
    Animis Rep
    facebook.com/xAnimis
    animis.org/forum
  28. Administrator
    Admin's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by AE14 View Post
    I agree, SOME are lazy and selfish, the same as in the private sector. However, as you and I know, to compare public and private sector jobs is ridiculous. At the end of the day, everyone has a choice about what field they want to go in, and to purposely go after those that chose a safer situation is silly. There is greater risk/reward in the private sector. However, the reason that many of us chose private sector jobs was the idea of security, to all of a sudden reopen collective bargaining sets a bad precedent imo. Hell, when things were going well, the unions did not ask to reopen and get more did they?
    In the private sector, its very easy to fire employees. As a teacher in NJ, its not....there is a major difference.

    To assume that the unions have the sway as the governor and his cronies is ill advised, and his behavior is the quintessential bully routine. He looks downright foolish.
    Actually they did in the past...And he looks good to a LOT of people. Some people think the unions need to get bullied around.

    So keeping this on target with the topic, Christie will not run in 2012, and even if he did, he would not get far. Once his financial situation comes to the forefront (as well as the helicopter to his sons baseball game) he's done.
    Nobody cares about his finances....as was the case with Obama....and nobody cares about the helicopter incident...except people who want to make it an issue and would never vote for him anyway. Most of the public could care less.

    I am hopeful that the GOP comes up with someone of relevance that can make this a race, as I am itching to find someone to believe in. I dont think that person is there though.
    Nope..they won't. Romney is a pure politician and Bachman and Perry are both idiots.



    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.

  29. Quote Originally Posted by EasyEJL

    Actually when a contract was set to expire soon, the unions very much played heavy handed with extracting maximum benefit. But you are wrong, there isn't both more risk + reward in the private sector, public sector employees are higher paid by education level than private sector, and paid higher per hour worked than public sector.... so they've gotten to where they have less risk, and more reward.
    This is wrong. I get paid far less with 2 masters degrees than if I was inure private sector.

    On your example, what happened when the unions played games? Nothing until it expired. That's why what the governor did was legally wrong.
  30. Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by AE14 View Post
    This is wrong. I get paid far less with 2 masters degrees than if I was inure private sector.
    not than you would doing the same job in the private sector. Moreso than for educators, i'm talking about just high school graduates working in the public sector though. From the US Dept of Labor

    Total employer compensation costs for private industry workers averaged $28.10 per
    hour worked in March 2011. Total employer compensation costs for State and local government
    workers averaged $40.54 per hour worked in March 2011.

    On your example, what happened when the unions played games? Nothing until it expired. That's why what the governor did was legally wrong.[/QUOTE]

    The other option was for the state to declare bankruptcy, rendering all labor contracts null and void then renegotiating from nothing. It was good enough for Obama to do with GM, including stealing money from the bondholders to give to the unions, why isn't it good enough to be used the other way around?
    Animis Rep
    facebook.com/xAnimis
    animis.org/forum
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Mdrol 53426 Oct.2012
    By Nova1723 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-05-2010, 10:49 AM
  2. M-DROL batch 52707 MAY 2012.
    By supra888 in forum Cycle Info
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 11-04-2009, 07:08 AM
  3. Ordering A Pizza In 2012
    By purebred in forum Politics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-28-2009, 09:08 AM
  4. Letter from 2012 in Obama's America
    By David Dunn in forum Politics
    Replies: 177
    Last Post: 10-27-2008, 01:50 PM
Log in
Log in