So Im watching CNN and Giuliani is on and says we have been attacked 3 times already under Obama and havent had any attacks under Bush.. WTF!?!?!? So since then naturally every station has this single approach of all saying we have been attacked more now then under Bush. I thought these were news reporters, but no they just echo whatever talking point is that day.
Let me try and recap here to try and get a better understanding of this...
Under Obama we had:
Little rock arkansas shooting
the Fort hood shooting
the recent underwear bombing attempt
Under bush we had..
the DC sniper
the shoe bomber
the solider who blew himself and other fellow soliders up in kuwait in 03 I think
the anthrax attacks
the shoting at the LA airport
the guy who drove a SUV into a crowd of people praising the bombers of 9/11 in 06
Oh and of course 9/11!!!
Now let me be fair. Bill O'riley did bring up and ask, "what about the shoe bomber", but it was dismissed and didnt count as an attack under Bush because it wasnt sucessful and it didnt happen over our soil it was in the air and was stopped by airline passengers... That sounds totally different then the underwear bomber. Of course the shoe bomber one doesnt count.
News is such a joke now-a-days
NOTE: This is not intended to be a Bush VS Obama thread such showing the stupidity of the news and how they report to the american people as if we are idiots. I mean this is their job to research facts and report back those facts to us. Not hear a talking point and all run with it without any real reasoning but to just talk. I dont know why I even watch TV anymore, its a little insulting