Empire state building goes red celebrating communism!
- 10-01-2009, 11:30 AM
- 10-01-2009, 11:34 AM
well with obama in office we are well on our way... we are FREE men and women here right? oh wait but we can't take 1t-tren.....
10-01-2009, 11:35 AM
10-01-2009, 11:55 AM
lol why wouldn't we celebrate? huh?! apparently they celebrate st patricks day, and independence day, its only right that we celebrate the communist revolution too, right??
lets have the kids in school celebrate the commie revolution too
Yes.. lets make everyone honor what is apparently 60+ years of pointless war, since now we seem to be celebrating about it all.. its only fitting that America celebrate their own entry into the communist regime..
I like how we don't celebrate any other communist countries and their revolutions, in fact we act against them, however, honor thy Chinese communism!
hell, lets all take a day off.. or wait.. how does that work? what is a communist celebration consist of anyway? government approved music and food? I CANT WAIT!
the past 2 weeks of life have been really eye opening as far as changes go though
10-01-2009, 11:59 AM
10-01-2009, 01:12 PM
If Fox News told you guys you should switch to wearing panties, I shudder to think of the visual consequences.
10-01-2009, 01:46 PM
yeah! fox news.. *sigh* even though it happens to be the first link you see in google when you type in 'empire state building red communism', which is probably why the link was posted, due to feasibility, not for some love for fox news.. instead, lets just read another reporters coverage of the same exact real life issue by visiting a different web site.. it really makes a big difference on the issue at hand..
10-01-2009, 02:05 PM
10-01-2009, 02:56 PM
10-01-2009, 03:14 PM
10-01-2009, 03:19 PM
10-02-2009, 03:38 AM
10-02-2009, 05:57 AM
You guys are saying it didn't really happen because it's on Fox News?
I mean if Bill O'Reilly said it, then chances are it didn't happen that way but you can only slant an actual report that's about a one time event so much.
10-02-2009, 10:11 AM
It's a privately owned building and if someone pays them to light up lights to celebrate something then that's their RIGHT as an AMERICAN. Those of you who think this should be stopped are arguing against the very freedom you're alluding to us loosing.... You and everyone else have a right to not utilize that building or other assets of that business if it upsets you.
10-02-2009, 06:50 PM
10-03-2009, 03:02 AM
10-03-2009, 08:14 AM
10-03-2009, 09:51 AM
10-03-2009, 01:56 PM
None of the news media outlets or their "non main stream" counterparts are unbiased in their coverage. If you watch one without at least watching the other to compare 'facts' and distinguish what's opinion, then you're really hurting yourself if you wish to stay informed. What is so damn irritating is how each side constantly flips attack and defense styles and only plug in current buzzwords and whatever their platform standard is.
Sometimes I start getting hope when I hear what appears to be a rationalized and well debated argument/news piece and then it gets stomped on by whatever twist is added to sway the viewer. Almost feels as if the reporters get some kind of high from being able to change the masses perception of reality.
10-03-2009, 02:16 PM
10-03-2009, 02:25 PM
10-03-2009, 02:33 PM
10-03-2009, 03:25 PM
10-03-2009, 06:26 PM
10-04-2009, 12:46 PM
So many people have beliefs based on... well basically nothing, that you can actually change peoples minds if you are patient. Ask them the right questions until they are arguing for your side then just say "so basically you think..." and restate your position. If you've done it right, they end up going "oh yeah I guess so."
You can do this with anything. I'm in science, so I'm agnostic leaning towards atheist. This has not stopped me from convincing atheists to go to church just because they were annoying me with their atheist rage.
10-04-2009, 01:53 PM
10-05-2009, 09:32 AM
10-05-2009, 10:13 AM
Think you took my statement a bit different than intended. I wasn't directing it towards those who don't like it. It was for those who think that it shouldn't be legally allowed. Should of made that more clear.
10-05-2009, 10:22 AM
Every president blames the previous administration for the mess they're cleaning up. that's how they compaigned to get into office 9/10 times. Nature of the beast but as far as your comment about why he doesn't interview with Fox is simple.
1. Why interview with potential liability to your current administration as well as fuel fire?
2. Your comment above is pretty much what is expected in terms of what a typical interview may look. Fox news is biased just as the others are.
I don't agree with the man's policies or the way the media tends to make him into an idol but i'd think he was stupid for a Fox interview.
10-06-2009, 01:03 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By mathis50262 in forum General ChatReplies: 0Last Post: 04-27-2009, 02:00 PM
- By p00ndawg in forum General ChatReplies: 4Last Post: 03-05-2009, 09:07 AM
- By jarhead in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 05-17-2006, 12:11 PM
- By highintensity in forum AnabolicsReplies: 6Last Post: 03-17-2005, 12:31 PM