Obama is flunking economics

  1. Board Moderator
    Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    47
    Posts
    31,888
    Rep Power
    852765
    Level
    95
    Lv. Percent
    49.85%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity RoyaltyActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting Pro

    Obama is flunking economics


    SAN DIEGO, California (CNN) -- Welcome to March Madness on the Potomac.

    Many Americans are so emotionally invested in the Obama presidency that they consider it too historic to fail.

    They won't tolerate any criticism of the president or his administration, finding it easier to simply attack critics. And whatever goes wrong that they can't defend or deflect, they just blame on George W. Bush.

    But to many of the rest of us, it's clear that President Obama is flunking economics. He is trying to do too much at once, and so he is not doing any of it well. He vows to cut the federal deficit while proposing an avalanche of new spending that will -- says the Congressional Budget Office -- increase it by as much as $9.3 trillion over the next decade.

    Here's the really bad news, though. No matter what else goes awry, Obama's strong suits are supposed to be communications and marketing. Yet, this week we learned that this isn't the case when he has to communicate and market his message on economics.

    It doesn't help matters much that Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner seems too small for his chair. When he needs to inspire confidence, Geithner does the opposite. Whenever he speaks and comes up short on specifics, the Dow plummets. And when that happens, the Obama supporters don't care and insist that Wall Street is part of the problem and thus can't recognize the solution.

    This week, after learning of the Treasury Department's plan to help banks unload so-called toxic assets, the market bounced back a bit. And now the Obama supporters are singing a different tune.

    But here's the big question: When Wall Street smiles on a government bailout, is it a good or bad thing for average Americans? It depends on how much is being given away and who has to pay the bill.

    This much is indisputable: The administration's economic plan is so sweeping, and our financial situation so precarious, that the administration needs nothing less than a master salesman for its economic agenda. Clearly, Geithner isn't up to the job. The sooner he steps aside, the better it will be for the administration.

    According to the pundits, Obama is supposed to pick up the slack and seal the deals that Geithner can't seem to close. However, anyone who tuned into this week's press conference has to wonder whether the president hasn't lost his touch. The popular narrative from conservatives -- that Obama stumbles when he is off the teleprompter -- is becoming more believable.

    When asked by a reporter about whether his budget would blow up the deficit and stick future generations with the bill, Obama got defensive and turned his answer into a slam against Republicans and then obfuscated his way through the rest of the question.

    When CNN's Ed Henry asked the president why it took him so long to publicly condemn the more than $150 million in AIG bonuses, as opposed to New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo who turned the issue into a national outrage, Obama appeared to take a swipe at Cuomo, a fellow Democrat, by saying: "I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak."

    Or maybe it's just that Obama realized that his administration wasn't guilt-free in the AIG debacle. There are many unanswered questions. Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Connecticut, told CNN last week that someone at the Treasury Department told him to put in the language in the bailout bill allowing for executive bonuses.

    If he's telling the truth (and really who knows, given that CNN caught Dodd being untruthful on the subject earlier) we need to know who in the Obama administration ordered the loophole. And that person needs to be removed.

    This week's news conference wasn't exactly Obama's finest hour. Still, it wasn't as bad as making a mocking reference to the Special Olympics on "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno" or joking about the recession on CBS' "60 Minutes."

    How is it possible that someone who was so likeable and so inspiring while running for president could, day by day, be so unlikable and so uninspiring as president?

    It's become more common for people to say that they want President Obama to fail. I don't want him to fail. I want him to succeed. I just don't see how we get there from here.

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Ruben Navarrette.

  2. Board Moderator
    Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    47
    Posts
    31,888
    Rep Power
    852765
    Level
    95
    Lv. Percent
    49.85%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity RoyaltyActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting Pro

    I personally never found him likable or inspiring. Just more blah blah blah of emotional talk - things that caused an emotional response. None of it with much reality behind it, more just a cheerleader.

    And while I certainly don't want to his his socialist policies enacted as entitlements are miserably hard to take away once given, and don't want to see him reelected, I certainly don't want to see him fail either.
  3. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.85%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    I agree with a lot of the points but this one
    This week's news conference wasn't exactly Obama's finest hour. Still, it wasn't as bad as making a mocking reference to the Special Olympics on "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno" or joking about the recession on CBS' "60 Minutes."
    I watched it and while it may not be PC it is hardly ammunition to be used on his ability or lack of ability in regards to economics.
    •   
       

  4. Board Moderator
    Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    47
    Posts
    31,888
    Rep Power
    852765
    Level
    95
    Lv. Percent
    49.85%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity RoyaltyActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Jayhawkk View Post
    I agree with a lot of the points but this one


    I watched it and while it may not be PC it is hardly ammunition to be used on his ability or lack of ability in regards to economics.
    No, it was more though a comment on his ability to speak without a teleprompter, which also brings to question the whole "he's the greatest orator of our time". Just sort of an additional explanation as to why he's having such a hard time selling his economic policy as he now has multiple messages to send, and they all have details now (unlike during the campaigns)
  5. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.85%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    I believe he has a much better ability to speak to a crowd over someone like Bush. He will of course make mistakes and more likely to do so without a telepromter. i believe he's having a hard time with the economics package for two reasons...

    1. They go crazy looking for blood for these execs to give their bonuses back but we find out it was his office that put it in there(raising questions about other issues)

    2. The world over is basically saying this is a bad plan.


    No amount of good public speaking will trump hard facts that are even being used by fellow democrats.
  6. Board Sponsor
    AE14's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    12,509
    Rep Power
    1097385
    Level
    74
    Lv. Percent
    53.51%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    just as a quick note, there are many economists who are in agreement with him. In fact, many who contribute to the Economist have voiced support for his plans.

    There are always more than 1 side to any coin
    Controlled Labs Head Board Rep
    adam @ ControlledLabs.com
    CONTROLLED LABS products are produced in a GMP for Sport certified facility
  7. Board Moderator
    Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    47
    Posts
    31,888
    Rep Power
    852765
    Level
    95
    Lv. Percent
    49.85%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity RoyaltyActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Reaper329 View Post
    just as a quick note, there are many economists who are in agreement with him. In fact, many who contribute to the Economist have voiced support for his plans.

    There are always more than 1 side to any coin
    Har de har har. Can you give a link to any of them actually supporting his specific budget, no just statements in general from before the details were out that they support his concepts?
  8. Board Sponsor
    AE14's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    12,509
    Rep Power
    1097385
    Level
    74
    Lv. Percent
    53.51%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    there are a few sources out there, some earlier than others:
    http://econ4obama.blogspot.com/2008/...-economic.html


    One issue is that the Economists website is down, so my search is being hampered a bit, but I am still searching
    Controlled Labs Head Board Rep
    adam @ ControlledLabs.com
    CONTROLLED LABS products are produced in a GMP for Sport certified facility
  9. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.85%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    I think a lot of people were in support with his plan until it was put in motion and people started looking at possible end results not being so 'nice' All in the name of reforming health care.
  10. Board Moderator
    Never enough
    EasyEJL's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    47
    Posts
    31,888
    Rep Power
    852765
    Level
    95
    Lv. Percent
    49.85%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity RoyaltyActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Reaper329 View Post
    there are a few sources out there, some earlier than others:
    http://econ4obama.blogspot.com/2008/...-economic.html


    One issue is that the Economists website is down, so my search is being hampered a bit, but I am still searching
    ok, cause that list is from before the election I haven't seen a single economist who was in support of the overall budget once the details were released. It was pretty unanimous that deficits of more than 5% of GDP are economically unsustainable, and either spending has to go down, or taxes have to go up.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Economics question...
    By bigrobbierob in forum Politics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-22-2009, 10:06 AM
  2. Economics/business question on credit
    By bigrobbierob in forum General Chat
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-29-2009, 02:54 PM
  3. Keynesian Economics, a Critique
    By RobInKuwait in forum Politics
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 09:28 AM
  4. Obama won...
    By RenegadeRows in forum General Chat
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 06-06-2008, 01:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in