YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
Anyone know how government taking hard earned money from Americans by the point of a gun is Patriotic?
Anyone know how government taking hard earned money from Americans by the point of a gun is Patriotic?
...and we already established that you love guns!Yeah, that is a f*cking idiot......Democrats want more government, more socialism, more taxes, no guns for citizens.....hmmm...
Yes....yes....yes....I love guns....very much....New Israeli Galil style side folder AK 47 7.62 X39.....gonna buy it next month....no 3 day wait...I have my CWP! 6 30 round magazines....3000 rounds of ammo.......Sig 220 month after when I sell my P226 and 500 rounds free btw...........and we already established that you love guns!
EDIT: the only things Liberals are good for are porn, lowering age of consent, and legalizing drugs.
I wish they'd just LOOK at Obama...they haven't even addressed Ayers that I know of.very foolish comment, he could have gone about this better. The only good thing for him right now is that the Palin bubble has burst, and is deflating rapidly as the investigation of her and the "first dude" is getting more scrutinized
very foolish comment, he could have gone about this better. The only good thing for him right now is that the Palin bubble has burst, and is deflating rapidly as the investigation of her and the "first dude" is getting more scrutinized
I was watching CNN yesterday (my gym had it on, no choice).I know how you WANT to believe this, but unfortunately it's not Palin, "it's the economy stupid".
Between this and the small business tax hike (again, as you said - if true) prospects for this election are dismal...the idea of voting that nut-tess so close to power is terrifying.I know how you WANT to believe this, but unfortunately it's not Palin, "it's the economy stupid".
The thing you have to remember is that Obama's taxes WILL affect you no matter what. Palin, and McCain for that matter, no matter how you feel about them, will most likely never affect our daily lives.Between this and the small business tax hike (again, as you said - if true) prospects for this election are dismal...the idea of voting that nut-tess so close to power is terrifying.
I dont know if I necessarily agree. Considering the state of affairs in the economy at the moment.The thing you have to remember is that Obama's taxes WILL affect you no matter what. Palin, and McCain for that matter, no matter how you feel about them, will most likely never affect our daily lives.
I think the numbers are agreeing with me at the moment. Her rating (approval or however it is termed) has dropped 8% points in one week. Obviously, that can and will change, but I am curious how trooper gate will affect herI know how you WANT to believe this, but unfortunately it's not Palin, "it's the economy stupid".
I think the numbers are agreeing with me at the moment. Her rating (approval or however it is termed) has dropped 8% points in one week. Obviously, that can and will change, but I am curious how trooper gate will affect her
I agree, teh national polls mean nothing, but this was not an election poll per se. It was more of an approval poll. I believe there is a slight difference, although I could be wrong.Actually, national polls as you agreed in the past, mean nothing. State polls do and at the moment they are closer than ever at any point in this election.
Which actually means even less in terms of who people will elect. Its basically asking, do you like them as a person.I agree, teh national polls mean nothing, but this was not an election poll per se. It was more of an approval poll. I believe there is a slight difference, although I could be wrong.
Actually, it is a positive as he was down in many of those swing states pre and post convention. He has closed the gap and basically made this race a dead heat which in this political environment, is a small miracle. Given the state of affairs, Republican should not win this race. If they do, I think the Democrat party will implode.Also, in terms of state polls, they are very close in typical red states, which is not good for McCain.
North Carolina, Virginia, Ohio amongst others and also depending on source, florida.
Will they change again, most certainly. The debates will tell a lot
Sadly this worked in 2004 with Bush, many of those polled voted for him b/c they liked him. It is like Junior High all over againWhich actually means even less in terms of who people will elect. Its basically asking, do you like them as a person.
while I agree to an extent, if he (McCain) loses 1 of those states, he is done for. I still cant see him winning this. Although I do agree, if he does win, the dems heads will explode, but it will be their own faultActually, it is a positive as he was down in many of those swing states pre and post convention. He has closed the gap and basically made this race a dead heat which in this political environment, is a small miracle. Given the state of affairs, Republican should not win this race. If they do, I think the Democrat party will implode.
Sadly this worked in 2004 with Bush, many of those polled voted for him b/c they liked him. It is like Junior High all over again
Its the same for Obama.while I agree to an extent, if he (McCain) loses 1 of those states, he is done for. I still cant see him winning this. Although I do agree, if he does win, the dems heads will explode, but it will be their own fault
No, sorry - that does NOT sound right: or is the Constitution just an archaic inconvenience? I know Dennis Miller & I parted company over this issue nearly a decade ago.Yes....yes....yes....I love guns....very much....New Israeli Galil style side folder AK 47 7.62 X39.....gonna buy it next month....no 3 day wait...I have my CWP! 6 30 round magazines....3000 rounds of ammo.......Sig 220 month after when I sell my P226 and 500 rounds free btw........
So I like lead propelling devices.....what's wrong with that???!!!! :fool2:
So we elect a liberal then hire someone to aim a lead propelling device at them after they lower the age of consent, legalize drugs and ugh...produce more porn?
Then we elect a Republican right? and not aim a lead propelling device at him this time!
Does that sound right?:woohoo:
I think 2004 had little to do w/ Kerry (about whom I have little positive to say...zero positive on tap: I'd have to go search for something).I don't think Bush got elected in 2004 because of his approval rating...I think it had to do with John Kerry being a complete idiot.
The "security mom" didn't vote for him because they like him.
Its the same for Obama.
RealClearPolitics - Electoral Map
Vietnam. They even voted in someone from another party.I think 2004 had little to do w/ Kerry (about whom I have little positive to say...zero positive on tap: I'd have to go search for something).
I think a there's a tiny bit of history at play here: I can recall NO occasion in US history when a Commander-in-Chief was replaced while troops were (arguably) under fire, no matter HOW unpopular he was. The American people have an old tradition of rallying around even the most distasteful POTUS when there's a war on.
Even if Kerry had been and EXCEPTIONAL candidate, he would have had little-to-no chance in '04.
Completely agree: then, too, I suspect that if Obama wins, the Republican Party will likewise destruct (if only by becoming self-marginalized as the 'right-wing religious nut-job' party)Given the state of affairs, Republican should not win this race. If they do, I think the Democrat party will implode.
Lyndon Johnson was replaced with Nixon.I think a there's a tiny bit of history at play here: I can recall NO occasion in US history when a Commander-in-Chief was replaced while troops were (arguably) under fire, no matter HOW unpopular he was.
The American people have an old tradition of rallying around even the most distasteful POTUS when there's a war on.
Johnson refused to run for a second term: an unique situation. He was NOT voted out of office. *HAD* he run, it's very likely he would have continued as POTUS (might-have-beens are not always instructive).Vietnam. They even voted in someone from another party.
Completely agree: then, too, I suspect that if Obama wins, the Republican Party will likewise destruct (if only by becoming self-marginalized as the 'right-wing religious nut-job' party)
As noted above:Lyndon Johnson was replaced with Nixon.
Johnson refused to run for a second term: an unique situation. He was NOT voted out of office. *HAD* he run, it's very likely he would have continued as POTUS (might-have-beens are not always instructive).
Johnson refused to run for a second term: an unique situation. He was NOT voted out of office. *HAD* he run, it's very likely he would have continued as POTUS (might-have-beens are not always instructive).
That would explain McCain getting the knob - I mean, nod - this time.Actually I think its the opposite. Republicans were supposed to lose. Most understood that and expected that.
Johnson refused to run for a second term: an unique situation. He was NOT voted out of office. *HAD* he run, it's very likely he would have continued as POTUS (might-have-beens are not always instructive).
In '68, Johnson would not run for re-election. The Dems selected Humphrey (of all people!) as their candidate after a very fractious primary season (in which both Eugene McCarthy & George Wallace competed) during the famous Chicago convention.Huh?
Please explain this because I think I"m reading this wrong.
Gawd, I love smart people!Actually, national polls as you agreed in the past, mean nothing. State polls do and at the moment they are closer than ever at any point in this election.
that's totally sincere, BTWGawd, I love smart people!
In '68, Johnson would not run for re-election. The Dems selected Humphrey (of all people!) as their candidate after a very fractious primary season (in which both Eugene McCarthy & George Wallace competed) during the famous Chicago convention.
Nixon defeated HUMPHREY. Not Johnson. Johnson wasn't on the ballot.
i speak good.Gawd, I love smart people!
Interesting! This is indirectly admitting that a McCain-Palin administration will maintain the status quo - continue where Mr. Bush stopped! It is interesting how you always recklessly go after Obama's throat, without bothering to cover your logical tracks in the process!The thing you have to remember is that Obama's taxes WILL affect you no matter what. Palin, and McCain for that matter, no matter how you feel about them, will most likely never affect our daily lives.
Tell that to the people who's job it is to defend who instead treat it like toilet paper.No, sorry - that does NOT sound right: or is the Constitution just an archaic inconvenience? I know Dennis Miller & I parted company over this issue nearly a decade ago.
I understand your reasoning, however, you misunderstand my meaning.Interesting! This is indirectly admitting that a McCain-Palin administration will maintain the status quo - continue where Mr. Bush stopped! It is interesting how you always recklessly go after Obama's throat, without bothering to cover your logical tracks in the process!
Ok and Obama said he's been to 57 states so far. Its a long campaign trail...I think McCain may know the President of Spain.It is interesting that any perceived error or slip in the Democratic campaign earns a new thread here within hours. Yet, it is conveniently forgotten that Mr. McCain, with his famed foreign-policy credentials, in an interview with a Spanish journalist earlier in the week, did not seem to know that Mr. Zapatero is the "President"/Prime Minister of Spain, a staunch NATO ally! Wish him luck!
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Biden - Brain-Dead Commie Libturd | Politics | 0 | ||
Joe Biden running for President | Politics | 33 | ||
Biden Forges President’s Signature On Executive Order To Make December Dokken History | General Chat | 3 | ||
Obama to drop Biden? | Politics | 15 | ||
Sen. Joseph Biden | General Chat | 10 |