ronnie without a doubt !
Attachments
-
38.2 KB Views: 22,663
you mean that arnold took way less drugs than yates and coleman right ?True, BUT...how about the amount of drugs guys like Arnold took compared to Yates and Coleman.
I friggin hate those "virtual posedown" pics.ronnie without a doubt !
arnold is 6-3I friggin hate those "virtual posedown" pics.
Arnold's picture is also:
1) Sharpened
2) not too scale; Arnold is the same height as Ronnie and Dorian.
.
sounds like someone's got a case of the Monday's...:stick:I friggin hate those "virtual posedown" pics.
Arnold is 5'11, 6'0 tops. My brother and I have met him in person. Arnold has always lied about his height and Weider has always exaggerated the height of top bodybuilders in the IFBB as much as VM did with wrestlers in the WWF and WWE.arnold is 6-3
neither coleman nor yates is that tall
Someone else told me the same thing. He said he went over to Ca. in the 70's and there was no way Arnold was 6'2 or '3. When did you meet him Null?Arnold is 5'11, 6'0 tops. My brother and I have met him in person. Arnold has always lied about his height and Weider has always exaggerated the height of top bodybuilders in the IFBB as much as VM did with wrestlers in the WWF and WWE.Arnold wears some serious lifts and he wasn't even as tall as my brother who is 6'1".
kurt angle has one of the ugliest bodies ive ever seen his peanut head is too big for his bodySomeone else told me the same thing. He said he went over to Ca. in the 70's and there was no way Arnold was 6'2 or '3. When did you meet him Null?
As for wrestlers I saw John Cina in a mall and he had to be at least 6'5. He was literally towering over everyone. They say he is 6'1 but I am that tall and he was much taller than me. He was also huge. He looks much bigger in person. I met jay cutler and I was more impressed by Cina's size but on TV he doesn't look that big. Then someone told me they met Curt Angle and they said he was 5'8 or shorter but the list him as 6 feet I think.
doesnt it say in pumping iron arnolds arms are 22"I friggin hate those "virtual posedown" pics.
They are done by a guy who loves to suck Arnold's schlong. As such, if you know photography you can EASILY see that the lighting for the Dorian and Ronnie pics are poor but the lighting for Arnold is perfect.
Arnold's picture is also:
1) Sharpened
2) not too scale; Arnold is the same height as Ronnie and Dorian.
If you want proof its not even remotely to scale, look at their arms. Arnold is well documented as having 19 inch arms in contest. Ronnie and Dorian had 22 inch or larger. In that picture they make Arnold's arms look bigger, and not only that, they make his triceps look bigger which we all know is a joke.
Dorian without a doubt!ronnie without a doubt !
I've had the oppurtunity to shake Dorian's hand and he isn't 5-11. I'm 6' and he was at least 2 to 3 inches shorter than I was.Thread is old I know but I just stumbled onto it and I know for a fact arnold is less than 6'. Stood right next to him coleman cutler dorian etc many many times before at the arnold. The only real tall bb's are lou ferrigno, art atwood, markus ruhl, and a select few more. Arnie is at most 5-11 and the same applies for ron and dorian. POSITIVE!
Same here.I would never want to be as big as any of them... But I wouldn't mind looking a tad smaller than like a 20 year old arnold
Exactly like I said at most 5-11. Oh yeah gunter is pretty tall too.I've had the oppurtunity to shake Dorian's hand and he isn't 5-11. I'm 6' and he was at least 2 to 3 inches shorter than I was.
I like Dorian and Arnold's backs. They seem to have lats that insert a bit lower than Coleman(although his is freaking wide!)
In regards to Arnold's height, it is very possible he used to be 6'2 or so back in the 70's. That was over 30 years ago and the man is in his 50's, of course he isn't as tall anymore, you loose a few inches as you get older!!!
What we need is someone who met him in the 70's to tell us how tall he was.
YOU'RE RIGHT! Arnold looks human. Yates and Coleman look like lab experiments.Ok if Arnold was 230 contest, and Ronnie has been 287 in contest, there is no comparison. Arnold looks like a statue of a Greek God or something, Ronnie and Dorian look like a genetic creation made in a lab. They do not even look remotely human anymore. I hate the way bodybuilders look today compared to the 60's and 70's. Sure they are bigger and stuff, but Draper and Arnold looked healthy and beastly and actually resembled human perfection.
I agree 100%. For this particular shot of Ronnie, his back is so voluminous that the muscles almost look like they create fat creases to me. I think it's just the angle at which his outer lats hang from his side. As far as aesthetics goes, I'd rank Dorian first, Arnold second, and Ronnie last.Yates has the bast by far. Ronnies looks deformed.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Interesting Ronnie Coleman Interview | Sports Talk | 0 | ||
Ronnie Coleman at 285lbs Shredded? | IronMag Labs | 3 | ||
Ronnie Coleman Gets Arnold Lifetime Achievement Award | IronMag Labs | 0 | ||
That Time Ronnie Got Beat… | IronMag Labs | 1 | ||
B | Ronnie Coleman: The King | General Chat | 13 |