![]() | ![]() |
| Join Anabolicminds.com!! Register Today! |
|
| | #1 |
| Registered User | ronnie without a doubt ! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Registered User | Arnold's back looks so much drier and vascular though. Hell Yeah. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Registered User | It may just be because it was at the O, but Dorian's back has SO much more detail and seperation. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Registered User | True, BUT...how about the amount of drugs guys like Arnold took compared to Yates and Coleman. Hell Yeah. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Registered User | I think ronnie gots the best one, without hesitation Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| ego killer | i say arnold has the best. looks like slabs of muscle on top of more slabs. 155lbs incline dumbbells x 9 http://youtube.com/watch?v=Z4vGkrhSSSA 585lbs squat x 2 http://youtube.com/watch?v=q0rpQLZT1I0 1400lbs leg press x 10 http://youtube.com/watch?v=67DXswA8w14 |
| | |
| | #7 |
| My P3N1Z is chafed. | Yates = most dense Coleman = widest Arnold = ... oldest ... but still good ![]() -“Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either.”-Albert Einstein -"Never trust the teller. Trust the tale. " - D.H. Lawrence - "Why don't we have a Sir Isaac Newton Day?" - Me Guess what? I know a secret! |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Banned | Quote:
They are done by a guy who loves to suck Arnold's schlong. As such, if you know photography you can EASILY see that the lighting for the Dorian and Ronnie pics are poor but the lighting for Arnold is perfect. Arnold's picture is also: 1) Sharpened 2) not too scale; Arnold is the same height as Ronnie and Dorian. If you want proof its not even remotely to scale, look at their arms. Arnold is well documented as having 19 inch arms in contest. Ronnie and Dorian had 22 inch or larger. In that picture they make Arnold's arms look bigger, and not only that, they make his triceps look bigger which we all know is a joke. | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Board Supporter | atleast no one will mistake my avatar anymore..... |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Pityin' fools since '81 | Quote:
neither coleman nor yates is that tall | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| purger of metrosexuality | I wouldn't doubt it if all 3 of those pics were touched up somewhat, but I think Yates has the best from these 3. |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| More Cowbell | Quote:
Myself, I've always been in awe of the pic of Yates. IMO, Ronnie's pic looks a little altered as well.. | |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Banned | Quote:
Arnold wears some serious lifts and he wasn't even as tall as my brother who is 6'1". | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Pityin' fools since '81 | are you serious? i always wondered how i'm 6-3 230 and <10% BF and i'm nowhere near arnolds size; even when he stated he was 230 contest. it makes alot more sense now..... |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Registered User | Quote:
As for wrestlers I saw John Cina in a mall and he had to be at least 6'5. He was literally towering over everyone. They say he is 6'1 but I am that tall and he was much taller than me. He was also huge. He looks much bigger in person. I met jay cutler and I was more impressed by Cina's size but on TV he doesn't look that big. Then someone told me they met Curt Angle and they said he was 5'8 or shorter but the list him as 6 feet I think. | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Registered User | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Registered User | Kurt doesn't train as a bodybuilder would, he trains for performance. |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Registered User | Quote:
freaking huge arms dude in predator his arms are still 20" or so and you know he has to be smaller | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Registered User | Guy's I have talked about this before..If you think the heights and weights posted in the mags are true ..well don't believe everything you read.. I have been to 4-5 pro shows over the years. none of those guys are as tall as they say..or as heavy..almost all of their heights are 3" shorter than what is printed. coleman and yates are probably 5' 8" at best.. yates back is much thicker ..and Arnolds arms are 22" watch pumping iron |
| | |