Pirate's Pics

Pirate · 12-29-2004, 12:02 PM

In these pics I am 6' 188lbs with a 7% bf. I broke my hand over the summer and had to get operated on. I got metel plates put im my hand holding my bones together. I lost about 22 lbs after my operation. If you have any comments please share.

Bouncer79 · 12-29-2004, 12:27 PM

Links don't work

Pirate · 12-29-2004, 12:35 PM

The pics work now.

Pirate · 12-29-2004, 12:54 PM

Bump that

Lean One · 12-29-2004, 03:36 PM

Looking good after going through what you say you did. How much weight have you gained back since then?

Rebel · 12-29-2004, 04:07 PM

Not bad man but I heard some kid u workout with is hugeeeee

CROWLER · 12-29-2004, 04:46 PM

Sorry to hear about the broken arm and the 22lb loss.

You will get it back MUCH quicker than it took to get it the first time.

I am not too sure about the 7% BF number. I realize the pics are not too good and the flash flatens you out.

To give you an idea this is approx 12%.

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attach...postid=1705878

This is an example of approx 7%

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attach...postid=2168597

Keep us updated on your comback and best of luck

Pirate · 12-29-2004, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebel

Not bad man but I heard some kid u workout with is hugeeeee

He was huge, and will probably be huge, but now hes just a big (())

......And with a 475 bench, where are your pics...

-Pirate

Pirate · 12-29-2004, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CROWLER

Sorry to hear about the broken arm and the 22lb loss.

You will get it back MUCH quicker than it took to get it the first time.

I am not too sure about the 7% BF number. I realize the pics are not too good and the flash flatens you out.

To give you an idea this is approx 12%.

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attach...postid=1705878

This is an example of approx 7%

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attach...postid=2168597

Keep us updated on your comback and best of luck

You are probably right, I took the digital deal and it said I was a nine, But then I did it again like a week later and said I was 6, and I knew that was far too low. So I just Kinda picked inbetween. I dont really care about my body fat though, as I am too skinny as it is. I gained about 20 lbs back. Ill post new pics around feb or march and I promise the differences will be seen!

-Pirate

**jminis** · 12-29-2004, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CROWLER

Sorry to hear about the broken arm and the 22lb loss.

You will get it back MUCH quicker than it took to get it the first time.

I am not too sure about the 7% BF number. I realize the pics are not too good and the flash flatens you out.

To give you an idea this is approx 12%.

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attach...postid=1705878

This is an example of approx 7%

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attach...postid=2168597

Keep us updated on your comback and best of luck

Those numbers are off bro. The pics you posted don't match up with 12% and 7%. There more like 7% and 3-4%

CROWLER · 12-29-2004, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jminis

Those numbers are off bro. The pics you posted don't match up with 12% and 7%. There more like 7% and 3-4%

Ok if you say so.

BTW the % BF for those pictures are from the ACTUAL person in the pictures.

It is interesting that YOU can tell what their BF% is by a picture better than they can determine THEMSELVES

So if a person was to be considerably lower in BF than the one YOU say is 3-4% BF then what would they be 1%??

**Beelzebub** · 12-30-2004, 01:33 AM

looking very proportioned pirate.

deadlifts could definately harden your lower back up some. upper back looks good, nice detail. and i'm not sure about the genetic factor, but your lats would look better if they swept down a little lower. perhaps, some bent over barbell rows.

everything looks good IMO. i'd say you're in between 7-9%. if you can keep that bf and put on about 20lbs, you'd look awesome.

i miss my abs.

Matthew D · 12-30-2004, 01:47 AM

Crowler, quit being such a ****..

**kwyckemynd00** · 12-30-2004, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CROWLER

Ok if you say so.

BTW the % BF for those pictures are from the ACTUAL person in the pictures.

It is interesting that YOU can tell what their BF% is by a picture better than they can determine THEMSELVES

So if a person was to be considerably lower in BF than the one YOU say is 3-4% BF then what would they be 1%??

I personally don't agree with many of skips readings on BF%.

I agree with jminis (and Matthew D for that matter).

BTW, do you know if skip takes all of his measurements hydrostatically??? If he doesn't, his measurements can be way off!

Also, you cannot guage one person's BF% measurements to anothers. I.E. Skip has tiny waist, ankles, legs, etc, etc...so, his think layer of fat can make up a much larger percentage of his body that that same thin layer would make up (in %) of a much larger person with the same layer of fat. Get how that works??? Hope so ....

EDIT: BTW, looking great pirate!

CROWLER · 12-30-2004, 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matthew D

Crowler, quit being such a ****..

Ok kids come on now let's play nice

**Beelzebub** · 12-30-2004, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CROWLER

I don't care if you ARE the board admin. There is NO reason to make a personal attack like that.

don't want to get too involved in this little dispute, but it sounded as if you were insulting jminis for his opinion on judging bodyfat. by emphasizing 'YOU' in your statement twice, it's taken as pretty sarcastic towards a mod that was just stating his opinion. not an attack bro. don't take it that way. just stating what i observed. we should live and let live a little bit more around here. we can't always tell what is meant by typing in a block.