Abieta-8,11,13-trien-18-oic acid

Page 3 of 10 First 12345 ... Last

  1. Because of its affects on inflammation. Would this be a bad thing to stack with ArA


  2. Quote Originally Posted by mechka_grizli View Post
    Because of its affects on inflammation. Would this be a bad thing to stack with ArA
    Others can speak to this more certainly but I would imagine like with fish oil or cissus type products, just dose as far away from eachother as possible, like at least 4 hours apart
    •   
       


  3. Quote Originally Posted by chedapalooza View Post

    Others can speak to this more certainly but I would imagine like with fish oil or cissus type products, just dose as far away from eachother as possible, like at least 4 hours apart
    I work out first thing in the AM and then dose my EP with my first meal post as per the label directions. Would it be acceptable to dose the EP before bed?

  4. Quote Originally Posted by mechka_grizli View Post
    Because of its affects on inflammation. Would this be a bad thing to stack with ArA
    Stacks fine sir. It's not about inflammation, it's about a specific type that you want to avoid: COX-2. This does not act there

  5. Quote Originally Posted by mr.cooper69 View Post

    Stacks fine sir. It's not about inflammation, it's about a specific type that you want to avoid: COX-2. This does not act there
    Thanx coop
    •   
       


  6. So...if arimistane is a slightly better AI than this new ingredient, why did PES make the switch? Am I missing something?

  7. Quote Originally Posted by fasttaker View Post
    So...if arimistane is a slightly better AI than this new ingredient, why did PES make the switch? Am I missing something?
    Could anyone ask this question one more time?
    PEScience Representative
    http://www.pescience.com/insider
    Instagram: kylebayne23

  8. Quote Originally Posted by kbayne View Post
    Could anyone ask this question one more time?
    I hadn't seen it asked before, and it hasn't been asked in this thread. I take it that no one has given a satisfactory answer yet?

  9. Quote Originally Posted by fasttaker View Post

    I hadn't seen it asked before, and it hasn't been asked in this thread. I take it that no one has given a satisfactory answer yet?
    Well, arimistane had side effects in a lot of users that the new compound apparently doesn't have. They included more of it (100mg instead of 75mg of arimistane) so it should be a great option to ppl who had sides from the old formula.

  10. Quote Originally Posted by tyrub42 View Post
    Well, arimistane had side effects in a lot of users that the new compound apparently doesn't have. They included more of it (100mg instead of 75mg of arimistane) so it should be a great option to ppl who had sides from the old formula.
    Gotcha. I appreciate it.

  11. Quote Originally Posted by fasttaker View Post
    So...if arimistane is a slightly better AI than this new ingredient, why did PES make the switch? Am I missing something?
    Arimistane is slightly more potent in vitro. Read the OP. This new compound has demonstrated bioavailability in vivo (something arimistane didn't have as per studies, but the anecdote strongly supported it) and it comes with the nice "side effect" of multi PPAR agonism and fat loss

  12. how would this be for us on trt?

  13. I understand for Abieta for some people that don't want sore joints.

    But why couldn't PES make both versions?

    Why not make the more joint friendly for those and the Arimistane version for those that DIDN'T suffer from joint pain?

    I'm just askin. I'm in the process of giving Abieta a shot at the moment. But I was just thinking why this couldn't be a possibility.

  14. Quote Originally Posted by Johnold View Post
    I understand for Abieta for some people that don't want sore joints.

    But why couldn't PES make both versions?

    Why not make the more joint friendly for those and the Arimistane version for those that DIDN'T suffer from joint pain?

    I'm just askin. I'm in the process of giving Abieta a shot at the moment. But I was just thinking why this couldn't be a possibility.
    It wasnt DSHEA compliant. It's supposed to getting pulled but many still use it. Apparently studies show abieta is more potent AI without the sides.. So in PES' eyes, it was a non issue and better product

  15. Quote Originally Posted by chedapalooza View Post

    It wasnt DSHEA compliant. It's supposed to getting pulled but many still use it. Apparently studies show abieta is more potent AI without the sides.. So in PES' eyes, it was a non issue and better product
    Actually it less potent than on if you look at studies. Neither is compliant but it was better for them to dc the OF and go with another since I'm sure it's caught the attention of the fda by now seeing so many companies use it

    Serious Nutrition Solution ~~

    mw at seriousnutritionsolutions dot com
    mike at competitiveedgelabs dot com


  16. Quote Originally Posted by mw1 View Post

    Actually it less potent than on if you look at studies. Neither is compliant but it was better for them to dc the OF and go with another since I'm sure it's caught the attention of the fda by now seeing so many companies use it
    How was the original not compliant if it is a metabolite of dhea and that is compliant? How is the new one not compliant?

  17. Yeah everyone is still using Arimistane.

    Ohwell. Let's all hope in the long run it was for a really good reason.

  18. Quote Originally Posted by SweetLou321 View Post

    How was the original not compliant if it is a metabolite of dhea and that is compliant? How is the new one not compliant?
    I think the compliance issue is just rumors and speculation. PES hasn't said anything about it and I think the change is unrelated. I would guess they changed it because so many other products use arimistane and they wanted to have an answer for people who can't use arimistane because of joint issues. It makes sense when you think about it from their perspective. They want new, cutting edge stuff that isn't offered widely. I just wish they kept both EPro formulas as I am in week 3 of my first EPro run and I haven't been this dry and vascular in...ever. maybe AS can release that extra extract in EPro as a solo product? That with Alphamax together would be insane for people who can tolerate arimistane!

  19. As an FYI, the new formula works very well. Im currently on the second bottle of the new EPro. Although the results took longer, I am very impressed with the weight loss benefits. I am stacking it with the new ABE and aRa. Started my phat routine at 256. I am now sitting at 244. This is on a bulk. However by upper body is definitely thicker than before. Have gotten several compliments from almost everyone. The recomp affects are amazing. Arimistane does work faster and might have been stronger but it always kinda peaked at the third week for me. This new formula has continued to bring results

  20. Quote Originally Posted by mechka_grizli View Post
    As an FYI, the new formula works very well. Im currently on the second bottle of the new EPro. Although the results took longer, I am very impressed with the weight loss benefits. I am stacking it with the new ABE and aRa. Started my phat routine at 256. I am now sitting at 244. This is on a bulk. However by upper body is definitely thicker than before. Have gotten several compliments from almost everyone. The recomp affects are amazing. Arimistane does work faster and might have been stronger but it always kinda peaked at the third week for me. This new formula has continued to bring results
    Interesting. Great feedback. Noticing some leaning now around week 3.5, almost week 4 and on a bulk. Only allotted myself 4 weeks but I will run for 8 next time, on a cut as well. But those numbers are great... Guess this is a true 8 week product

  21. So with these results and it taking longer for things to kick in, I'm wondering whether this product should or could be run longer?. Even longer than 8 weeks since people seem to say it kicks in at around week 3 and beyond.

  22. Quote Originally Posted by T-Bone View Post
    So with these results and it taking longer for things to kick in, I'm wondering whether this product should or could be run longer?. Even longer than 8 weeks since people seem to say it kicks in at around week 3 and beyond.
    Interesting question. However there is a guy who commented that he dosed one cap of the new formula reg erase along side new EPro , and he noted that the results kicked in faster and they were comparable to Arimistane
  23. AnabolicMinds Site Rep
    Driven2lift's Avatar

    Quote Originally Posted by T-Bone View Post
    So with these results and it taking longer for things to kick in, I'm wondering whether this product should or could be run longer?. Even longer than 8 weeks since people seem to say it kicks in at around week 3 and beyond.
    Up for being a test dummy.
    Depending on rep feedback on that idea
    PEScience Representative; Use the code Driven for 30% off at pescience.com

  24. Quote Originally Posted by mechka_grizli View Post

    Interesting question. However there is a guy who commented that he dosed one cap of the new formula reg erase along side new EPro , and he noted that the results kicked in faster and they were comparable to Arimistane
    Quote Originally Posted by Driven2lift View Post

    Up for being a test dummy.
    Depending on rep feedback on that idea
    Sounds like a solid approach IMO. Perhaps the solo erase could be dosed higher then.. 4 caps daily instead if 3 for 8 weeks and accelerated results. I would try it but my bottle is almost gone so it wouldn't be worth it/show a difference

  25. Quote Originally Posted by T-Bone View Post
    So with these results and it taking longer for things to kick in, I'm wondering whether this product should or could be run longer?. Even longer than 8 weeks since people seem to say it kicks in at around week 3 and beyond.
    Well it takes longer to kick in, but the effects also last longer than a typical product once you've discontinued use. Something to think about
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Trenavar question (estra-4 9 11-triene-3 17)
    By liftallday123 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10-24-2012, 04:59 PM
  2. Going from 13.3%bf to 11%, help?
    By ih8uselessppl in forum Weight Loss
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-02-2011, 02:08 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-26-2009, 04:42 PM
  4. DanTman's CUTTING log...starting 11/13/05
    By danTman2 in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 379
    Last Post: 08-28-2006, 11:04 PM
Log in
Log in