Winny tabs or masteron?

Page 2 of 2 First 12
  1. Elite Member
    Dr.Stri8ed's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  192 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    6,173
    Rep Power
    156114
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    48.63%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by carnivore24
    i def understand the longer your on test scenario, but still i was wondering if theres any science to back up what your saying. if you take a 19nor of something else that will shut you down hard. whats the diff if its 3 weeks vs 50 weeks?

    saying well your testies being out of action for 50 weeks is worse cuz its longer is the definition of broscience. again not trying to sound like a dick. it more than likley is true and may be nothing to back it up but i just want to see if there is. because on paper what your saying should be right but we all know our bodies dont always react the same or how they should.
    On paper shutdown is shutdown, your LH level would probly b the same with 10 weeks or 20 weeks, but the point is I've seen in all cases of ppl I know who did very long cycles their recovery was very rough and much longer than when they did shorter cycles and recovered in 4-6 weeks. Don't u think we would all run 30 week cycles if the level of shutdown and recovery time was the same versus an 8 week cycle?

  2. New Member
    carnivore24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    34
    Rep Power
    50
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    98.17%

    First off I wanna say I do side with the longer the cycle probably the longer the recovery just hoping someone had prove.

    As far as everyone running 30 week cycles are not popular because of the health side effects. Running even high levels of test alone isn't great for you for that long not to mention what tren would do to you. And your body kinda figures out what's going on after awhile and gains drastically slow after 8 weeks or so. Anabolic hormones are Hgh but your body has raised your catabolic hormones also.

    So in no way do I think people should do 6 month cycles but just wanted to see if theres any prove of shutdown of 8 weeks vs 52 or what have you
  3. Senior Member
    DetroitHammer's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  250 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Age
    60
    Posts
    1,211
    Rep Power
    20689
    Level
    28
    Lv. Percent
    41.38%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by carnivore24 View Post
    i def understand the longer your on test scenario, but still i was wondering if theres any science to back up what your saying. if you take a 19nor of something else that will shut you down hard. whats the diff if its 3 weeks vs 50 weeks?

    saying well your testies being out of action for 50 weeks is worse cuz its longer is the definition of broscience. again not trying to sound like a dick. it more than likley is true and may be nothing to back it up but i just want to see if there is. because on paper what your saying should be right but we all know our bodies dont always react the same or how they should.
    There are plenty of guys on TRT for years and decide to get off it and recover with zero PCT. Conversely, I know of young guys, 19 years old, who after one cycle of test/deca shut down hard and two years later were still shut down. I know both them and their doctor.

    There is no proof beforehand how your body will respond to any AAS. What shuts one guy down may send you into libido heaven. Tren comes to mind as one of those roll-the-dice compounds. Even the cycle time recommended by most guys is just a mark on the wall that everyone seems to agree to. In my opinion, if you stop a cycle at 12 weeks or 40 weeks, your recovery will be the same given the same PCT. It's not the shut down that dictates the cycle, it's the other damage, like RBC, Lipid profile and liver toxicity that keeps the cycle within the 16 week range. So if your only concern is natural testosterone recovery, no matter what you take, recovery should be the same regardless of the weeks on AAS, given the same on-cycle support and PCT.
    •   
       

  4. Elite Member
    Dr.Stri8ed's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  192 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    6,173
    Rep Power
    156114
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    48.63%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by carnivore24
    First off I wanna say I do side with the longer the cycle probably the longer the recovery just hoping someone had prove.

    As far as everyone running 30 week cycles are not popular because of the health side effects. Running even high levels of test alone isn't great for you for that long not to mention what tren would do to you. And your body kinda figures out what's going on after awhile and gains drastically slow after 8 weeks or so. Anabolic hormones are Hgh but your body has raised your catabolic hormones also.

    So in no way do I think people should do 6 month cycles but just wanted to see if theres any prove of shutdown of 8 weeks vs 52 or what have you
    I totally agree with u. Its not healthy by any means to run a cycle that long. I don't have any of my friend's bloodwork to post but in all honesty they all said recovery was brutal and much longer than shorter cycles they ran.
  5. Elite Member
    Dr.Stri8ed's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  192 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    6,173
    Rep Power
    156114
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    48.63%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by DetroitHammer

    There are plenty of guys on TRT for years and decide to get off it and recover with zero PCT. Conversely, I know of young guys, 19 years old, who after one cycle of test/deca shut down hard and two years later were still shut down. I know both them and their doctor.

    There is no proof beforehand how your body will respond to any AAS. What shuts one guy down may send you into libido heaven. Tren comes to mind as one of those roll-the-dice compounds. Even the cycle time recommended by most guys is just a mark on the wall that everyone seems to agree to. In my opinion, if you stop a cycle at 12 weeks or 40 weeks, your recovery will be the same given the same PCT. It's not the shut down that dictates the cycle, it's the other damage, like RBC, Lipid profile and liver toxicity that keeps the cycle within the 16 week range. So if your only concern is natural testosterone recovery, no matter what you take, recovery should be the same regardless of the weeks on AAS, given the same on-cycle support and PCT.
    Good point. Everyone is an individual.
  6. New Member
    carnivore24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    34
    Rep Power
    50
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    98.17%

    Quote Originally Posted by DetroitHammer

    There are plenty of guys on TRT for years and decide to get off it and recover with zero PCT. Conversely, I know of young guys, 19 years old, who after one cycle of test/deca shut down hard and two years later were still shut down. I know both them and their doctor.

    There is no proof beforehand how your body will respond to any AAS. What shuts one guy down may send you into libido heaven. Tren comes to mind as one of those roll-the-dice compounds. Even the cycle time recommended by most guys is just a mark on the wall that everyone seems to agree to. In my opinion, if you stop a cycle at 12 weeks or 40 weeks, your recovery will be the same given the same PCT. It's not the shut down that dictates the cycle, it's the other damage, like RBC, Lipid profile and liver toxicity that keeps the cycle within the 16 week range. So if your only concern is natural testosterone recovery, no matter what you take, recovery should be the same regardless of the weeks on AAS, given the same on-cycle support and PCT.
    This is pretty much what I was thinking. I kinda always thought recovery was really up to your genetic profile or whatever you wanna call it. And shut down was shut down no matter how long. Thanks
  7. Senior Member
    technique88's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  225 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,203
    Rep Power
    179619
    Level
    37
    Lv. Percent
    32.12%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    I'm thinking of throwing in some test suspension, micronized in water, for an extra boost on some of my harder work out days. I won't be using it everyday just here and there. I was wondering how many mg/mL to use pre work out and wyen to inj.?
    My muscles are pharmaceutically enhanced.
  8. Elite Member
    Dr.Stri8ed's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  192 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    6,173
    Rep Power
    156114
    Level
    54
    Lv. Percent
    48.63%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by technique88
    I'm thinking of throwing in some test suspension, micronized in water, for an extra boost on some of my harder work out days. I won't be using it everyday just here and there. I was wondering how many mg/mL to use pre work out and wyen to inj.?
    50-75mg 1 hour before your workout.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Masteron, proviron, or winny ?
    By Jimmytest in forum Cycle Info
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-16-2010, 02:03 PM
  2. Tren A, Masteron, and Winny Cycle
    By BigD85 in forum Old School Hormone Use
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-06-2010, 12:13 AM
  3. Test/Winny/Masteron
    By ozarkaBRAND in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-22-2009, 09:55 PM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-12-2008, 07:48 AM
  5. Winny Tabs?
    By bravoboy2005 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-21-2006, 08:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in