Who's read this book? I just ordered a copy, I'm very excited to read it.
Same I read through it some EVERY DAY almost. And when I hit up the pooper, I take it and study and try to memorize differant molecules during throne time... no joke.books INFUC KINGSANE
love it great read very informative!
Would you recommend also picking up anabolics 2009 then? The more info the better we can cycle, and the more helpwe are to those in need on here.i must say it is missing a few things
but it also overlaps a lot with anabolics 2009
but theres also insane uncomparable information that the other books dont posess that this one does.
some aromatase inhibitors (6-bromo specifically which has a lot of controversy surrounding it)Hey Crazy what do you think it is missing?
I love the book and have skimmed trhough it once and need to do so again. I reall loved how it breaks everything down science wise before getting to the profiles, I think that is the real invaluable information. Actual basica science that people can read and get all the simple answers that come up so often. It gets very in depth and I like everyhting cited and back with science with very little opinion in it.
well yea but he has the PPAR pathways in there,Fair enough. I think the glucose pathways (you mean like GLUT transporters or others?) are not super well known and may have been why he left them out. You never know. Takes time to write a book so hard to get it all perfect in a good time frame.
Thanks for the positive reviews and constructive criticsm.well yea but he has the PPAR pathways in there,
and out of the 8 or 10 glucose transporters 5 are well known. and GLUT1 and 4 are both very important and can be activated via certain methods (nutrient partitioners) and exercise.
and in terms of the supercompensation we get from certain anabolics as well as the "flat" feeling we get from others (adrenosterone) there is definetly some research behind.
Thanks for the positive reviews and constructive criticsm.
PPARS were included minimally since they are a member of the nuclear hormone receptor family. The book is not perfect and there are definitely some areas that i would like to expand and others where I would like to go much deeper.
Yes, can we expect a V2?Well u write it I buy it bro simple as that
Always seeking the info
But let's settele the dr d pa argument with 6 bromo in ur eyes...
I am kind of torn on a V2 for two reasons 1) Don't want to screw over people who have bought the book 2) not sure i have the time.Yes, can we expect a V2?
The argument that I am aware of is that PA thinks 6-bromo may have some anabolic/androgenic activity. Was there more to it than that? Just want to make sure I have the facts before i comment -- i don't follow the supps section on any boards regularly.Well u write it I buy it bro simple as that
Always seeking the info
But let's settele the dr d pa argument with 6 bromo in ur eyes...
There is no evidence so this will only be my opinion :the alpha isomer is likely to have some anabolic/androgenic activity without converting. Also, I think it is likely that there is some conversion to bromotest. Would either of these fators be enough to cause suppression in the face of the aromatase inhibition, I don't know but i lean towards minimal suppression.arguement was that just like FORM it can convert to bromotest and thus cause shutdown
however D stated that the steric strain of the molecule would inhibit that from happening because its just too bulky.
then there was the mix of a and b isomers the more potent one having more of the possibility for shutdown then the less potent beta isomer.
to put it simple.
you wouldnt be screwing anyone over who bought the first book, im sure they would be creaming their pants if a V2 came out. i would be, but im also a little mentally unstabe ...
I think you might be mistaken. Aromasin is not brominated . But it is 6-substituted.I always though of 6bromo similar to aromasin in its action. Both brominated and pssible androgenic effects at high dose
If you had time I would rather not see the same book V2 like some series that updates a little bit and sells it as a brand new book.I am kind of torn on a V2 for two reasons 1) Don't want to screw over people who have bought the book 2) not sure i have the time.
So, If I do a V2 it would have to have enough new information so that people who bought the book do not feel like they are getting the shaft.
I am in favor of that as well. I like having things to look at and read article wise and thigns could be up to date.Admittedly the peptide section is one area that I would like to greatly expand -- really could be it's own book. My biggest problem right now is time. None of this stuff is my full-time job -- more of a hobby, so i have to squeeze stuff in where i can. Cord's idea of a newsletter is actually a great one becuase I could break up the work over time.
If there was enough interest, i would definitely consider doing it -- always hard to gauge though.I am in favor of that as well. I like having things to look at and read article wise and thigns could be up to date.
If there was enough interest, i would definitely consider doing it -- always hard to gauge though.
I can be down with this.I'm down for news letter we can subsribe via email and pay monthly and it can be sent out once a week or bimonthly
100 pages in a day, dayum. I love the book but wow hahah :bling:I just received my book yesterday, read the first 100 pages, and wow. So much information, to be honest some of it was over my head, but im starting to get to the good stuff. good work seth.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
WHY BODYBUILDERS ARE DYING | Jon Bravo Responds to Seth Feroce | IronMag Labs | 0 | ||
S | AAS and the Adrenal Gland (Seth Roberts' views requested) | Anabolics | 19 | |
S | Question to SETH ROBERTS: Using anti-testosterones before a cycle | Anabolics | 4 | |
ATTN seth roberts ketotifen question | Anabolics | 2 | ||
C | Seth Roberts, Help: Half-Life Of T3? | Anabolics | 47 |