More Anabolic? 300 Tren E/wk or 700 Primo/wk
- 07-11-2009, 05:44 PM
- 07-11-2009, 05:51 PM
probably tren.....who cares!!!!!!!! run em both!!!!!!!!!
edit: just wanted to say that ive never run tren E so this is not an experienced answer....
07-11-2009, 07:26 PM
07-12-2009, 06:37 PM
May I just ask you why on the one hand you would concider one of the harshest compounds (tren) and on the other one of the smoothest? Any test with this? Have you concidered EQ, or masteron?
07-12-2009, 06:41 PM
07-12-2009, 07:35 PM
Tren :makes me a bit nutty but I love the recomp! Contemplating a mild dose run.
Primo: The other side of me says to steer clear ofTren. Again, it makes me batty. BUT, to get decent effects, youneed to run 600+ . At 100mg/ml, that's too many darn (somewhat Primo-painful pokes) if you include the test cyp I plan to run with either.
EQ: anxiety out the ying yang. Never again!
Masteron: I heard you need to be sub 10% .fat to see anything.Im sitting at 12% or so
07-15-2009, 11:11 AM
Tren is one of those chemicals that bring with it insane things...on the other hand, if I literally had to choose between running tren solo or primo solo, I would DEFINITELY run the primo.....assuming you could afford to run it with enough mgs to make it desirable. If there are other things involved in the cycle besides these two, then I may have to rethink that....
Similar Forum Threads
- By vduzin12 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 16Last Post: 03-27-2008, 07:46 AM
- By vduzin12 in forum Cycle InfoReplies: 3Last Post: 03-26-2008, 12:56 PM
- By freqfly in forum AnabolicsReplies: 3Last Post: 06-09-2007, 04:51 PM
- By Lifter65 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 10Last Post: 01-18-2006, 02:55 PM
- By Chemo in forum AnabolicsReplies: 5Last Post: 10-17-2003, 02:05 PM