plant based diet?
- 10-17-2012, 01:30 AM
Incorporating plants and meat is def a better combo. In reality our bodies do not care what the brain thinks. Food is processed the same way for millions of years. So understnading our digestive track is more important than trying to align our theories with certain lifestyle because some study say so. I have gotten to the point that I will call a spade a spade if I see the theory is wrong. For 50 years Ancel Keys theory of fat being bad has yielded a world of fat and unhealthy population. It's time to change that and call this low fat theory for what it is..bull shiet!
Vegetables, meat, fats and some fruits in the right combination will from my experience yield the best results. This we can agree on.
- 10-17-2012, 02:31 AM
Fuel for the Fire:
Showing benefits of vegetarian and low meat diets over high meat diets. (cancer, diabetes etc.)
Lower blood pressure for veggie heads
vegan diets don't improve alkalinity
High consumption of red meat promotes diabetes -> "confirms a positive association"
Less meat = less chance of cancer, diabetes, coronary heart disease.
And to be fair, I typed 'vegetarian bad' and 'vegetarian unhealthy' into pubmed and got this...
Vegetarian diets adequate for children, unless: "too much reliance on convenience foods, lack of variety and lack of exercise." Which is true for any diet.
Vegetarian diet following fasting is beneficial for rheumatoid arthritis patients
Vegetarian women less likely to develop gestational diabetes mellitus
Atherosclerosis prevented by low-fat diet
Lacto-ovovegetarian diet used to treat type 2 diabetes, athersclerosis, metabolic syndrome.
And the ONE study mostly showing evidence against a vegetarian diet
Interesting? I prefer this method over spouting opinion/talking points. If you can't find research to back it up, then don't say it. (That's an invitation to you, to do research and present it)My parents created my body, in which I create my mind. I will honor them, by developing both to their utmost potential.
- 10-17-2012, 02:32 AM
Sorry, that sounded really combative. I've had a sh!tty day lol.
But for real, I'd be interested to see some contradictory research.My parents created my body, in which I create my mind. I will honor them, by developing both to their utmost potential.
10-17-2012, 10:08 AM
There is no fuel for the fire because anybody can manipulate any data and write articles to serve their purpose. THat's nothing new.
I mean some articles are just presenting a point of view that is troublesome. Meat doesnt promote diabetes that's ridiculous and I dont need any article to suggest that. I can try that theory myself and I have over the years. In contrary, my sugar glucose has improved by 10-15% since I lowered my carbs and I eat as much meat and fat as I want. The same goes with blood pressure. On carbs I had elevated blood pressure now on low carbs I run 110 over 65 and Im 6ft 240-245lbs with 8% body fat. So you see I rather take people's experiences and my own over scientific data which is most cases bias because of who pays for the study itself.
The one issue I see with a plant based diet entirely in bodybuilding is that it doesnt really work well. I know there are some ppl doing it but there is too much need for protein and extra energy that plants cant supply to fully develop the body. But I think a diet can be enhanced with plants and can be incorporated along with meat and fat.
10-17-2012, 10:14 AM
10-17-2012, 10:49 AM
The one important factor in this entire discussion is insulin. The more we eat foods that require the release of insulin the greater risk for our health. If you want to understand more about this just look into type 1 and 2 diabetes over a lifetime of people with these diseases. You will see that high insulin will eventually create high blood pressure, increase fat storage,lipid problems (high trigrycerides, bad LDL etc) and the so called methbolic syndrome. Besides, when insulin is elevated growth hormone and other proceses including fat burning from adipose issue is stopped because our bodies get the signal to store through insulin.
So meat and fat are not our enemy but the real enemy is our own ignorance.
10-17-2012, 11:34 AM
If you'd rather talk about personal experiences than published research, I know a guy who was pretty much 'Mr. Meat', ate hamburgers and the like quite frequently -> developed diabetes -> lived with it for a while and became overweight and weak -> went 'raw vegan' and was relieved entirely of his diabetes and subsequent fat gain.
It is absolutely true that there are certain agendas being promoted throughout the scientific community, an example are those of pharmaceutical companies which stand to profit from selling more product, but who stands to profit from pushing a vegetarian/vegan diet? There's not a lot of big money there, not that I'm aware of (the here-say part).
It is unreasonable and a willingness for ignorance to refuse the findings of current research.
Protein promoting insulin resistance
Even Lance Armstrong agrees on protein's promotion of insulin resistance lol.
My parents created my body, in which I create my mind. I will honor them, by developing both to their utmost potential.
10-17-2012, 11:52 AM
"Protein instigates a high insulin response, similar to carbohydrates".
Your body only breaks down no more than 30% of the protein intake for glucose IF it has to do it. So if you eat 100g of protein only 30g will be onverted to glucose if the body needs it.
Very very wrong! Not by long shot. Take a glucose meter eat protein check your glucose then eat carbs like rice check glucose and get back to me. Let me know what you find!
Your friend got diabetes not because the meat but because he ate the buns with that burger to put in simple terms. lol
And when you eat fat/carbs/protein in abundance it triggesrs a cascade of bad things where the body will deal with the high glucose first and store the fat as adipose fat and also dumping some glucose as triglycerides in the blood stream. Basic biochemistry if you want to look into.
10-17-2012, 01:50 PM
"It is absolutely true that there are certain agendas being promoted throughout the scientific community, an example are those of pharmaceutical companies which stand to profit from selling more product, but who stands to profit from pushing a vegetarian/vegan diet? There's not a lot of big money there, not that I'm aware of (the here-say part). "
Many people who promote a vegan diet are against killing animals for food. I understand their point of view and I admire their cause, it's more humanitarian than promoting vegan as being healthy. I also can agree that people can eat what they want however, what I dont agree with is how we are being told what to eat (mostly carbs) and how foods affect people (diabetes). A calorie is not a calorie!!! People dont get fat because they are laizy most times, and dont exercise enough. It is a complex argument and in reality if one can dig deeper into biochemistry books and actually experiement with eating certain foods and understanding how these foods actually work along with hormones many of the myths will be just that myths!
Smart knowledge is power bad science can kill. Think about it!
10-17-2012, 10:52 PM
Just like ancel keys is giving fat a bad name. You are giving carbs a bad one. Carbs are the main source of energy for the body. In your case which your carb intake is relatively lower or someone who disregards carbs will induce ketosis which uses stored fat for energy. People think they are losing fat during this process but it's just water weight from the body neutralizing the ketones acidity by increased urination. If you don't eat enough carbs your body is pulling protein from your organs and muscles which can lead to failure of your heart/kidneys/liver etc. Low Carb diets are complete failures even though they show short term results. Look at the Atkins diet.
10-17-2012, 11:23 PM
Fruits and vegetables are fine is the grains and heavy starches that have an inherent problem.
"If you don't eat enough carbs your body is pulling protein from your organs and muscles which can lead to failure of your heart/kidneys/liver etc. Low Carb diets are complete failures even though they show short term results. Look at the Atkins diet."
This statement I dont agree with because I've been on a low carb diet for a while now and Im perfectly fine. I hardly eat any carbs sometimes there are days what I go without carbs and I dont have liver/kidneys/heart failure.
I suggest you read a biochemistry book. You will find there that our mythocandria the cell that creates ATP(energy) uses fat and/or glucose equally effective. Educate yourself
10-17-2012, 11:27 PM
(1)"There is limited evidence of an association between vegetarian diets and cancer prevention" Evidence linking red meat intake, particularly processed meat, and increased risk of CHD, cancer and type 2 diabetes is convincing and provides indirect support for consumption of a plant-based diet. I would never tell anyone to get most of their meat intake from processed sources (it has ALOT more sodium) And last but not least, While vegetarian diets have not shown any adverse effects on health, restrictive and monotonous vegetarian diets may result in nutrient deficiencies with deleterious effects on health.
(3) "It can be hypothesized that vegan diets do not affect acid-base homeostasis. With respect to bone health, the significance of this finding needs further investigation." It can be hypothesized? Thats not a finding, that means they couldnt find a correlation. Also, it needs further investigation
(4)this one made me laugh, over 11 years they developed diabetes? Did it not also occur to them that perhaps the carbohydrate in their diet lead to diabetes? Considering that is one of the main causes... Also, from the methods they listed, it seems (cant be sure though without full text) that they could ONLY eat red meat or white meat and nothing else? Or ate far more than on a daily basis than any real person would? Hard to ascertain without full text.
(5) " Although the dietary intake data used here were collected a decade ago" Still relevant for today? hmmm...Also, most of that research was based on assumption that even they said could be misinterpreted. And I quote "Our point estimates for these reductions have associated uncertainties, which we have estimated using Monte Carlo simulation, although the RR estimates may still be more uncertain than we have assumed"
(6) This one didn't agree with your point? "Vegan diets are more likely to be associated with malnutrition"
(7) Im noticing a pattern here... "More randomised long-term studies are needed to confirm this view by methodologically convincing data."
(8) The results of this study indicate that bad obstetrics history, obese patient on high calorie diet especially non vegetarian diet with less physical activity are highly prone to develop GDM. No Sh*t. High calorie diet? Susceptible to obesity? Lack of physical activity.. Of course you'll end up with diabetes. Well, not in all cases, but this certainly wont help. Doesnt prove vegan diets work.
(9) Couldnt link to the full study
(10) Same as above
(11) Same as above.
10-17-2012, 11:31 PM
10-18-2012, 10:50 AM
10-18-2012, 10:59 AM
Your body is supposed to derive glucose from carbs. Carbs are not bad for you. When a sedentary lifestyle is put into the mix all of those carbs are stored as fat. Why would you want your body to pull fat and protein from cells, muscles, and organs just so you can lose water weight and become dehydrated?
10-18-2012, 10:52 PM
[QUOTE=AdiPure7;3669048]Your body is supposed to derive glucose from carbs. Carbs are not bad for you. When a sedentary lifestyle is put into the mix all of those carbs are stored as fat. Why would you want your body to pull fat and protein from cells, muscles, and organs just so you can lose water weight and become dehydrated?[/QUOTE]
Link to study?
10-18-2012, 10:59 PM
10-18-2012, 11:05 PM
All I am doing is describing ketosis. Ketones are acidic so your body flushes them out using water which leads to dehydration and increases urination. And I am a college student if that matters.
10-19-2012, 03:14 AM
A mild acidosis may result from prolonged fasting or when following a ketogenic diet or a very low calorie diet.
it is unlikely for a normal functioning person to reach life-threatening levels of ketosis
People who are unable to secrete basal insulin, such as type I diabetics and long-term type II diabetics, are liable to enter an unsafe level of ketosis, causing an eventual comatose state that requires emergency medical treatment.
The body also has a tremendous capacity to adapt, and adpting to using ketones and fatty acids will occur after a while.
10-19-2012, 09:30 PM
Yes I know that from a biological perspective. All I am saying is carbs should be and are the main source of glucose for the human body. Even if you have some ketones in your blood your body needs to get rid of them because they are acidic which messes up your acid base balance. Like I said earlier and you disagreed. Adaptation is obvious but your body would rather just get energy from carbs because it has no side effects.
10-19-2012, 09:55 PM
Many others on this forum have had success with both high carb and low carb diets and so it is a matter of personal preference imo. However I do draw the line when people say that low carb diets are dangerous, when high carb diets can also be dangerous. You just have to find a balance that works for you.
10-19-2012, 11:41 PM
How about this side effect from carbs DIABETES! Which kind of puts another twist in your theory of no side effects from carbs and further more, you can only process carbs through insulin whereas fats can be processed very easily without anything. If the cells are insulin insensitive or insulin is not excreted enough you are ****ed. According to your theory without glucose you will die since you cant use fat for energy but you dont. Your body can use fat for energy extremely easy and efficient for life. Many type 1 diabetics do eat a low carb diet and they live a long life. If you bother to read, which you seem to have a hard time doing and reason I asked how old you were, you will find that major organs preffer ketones body and fatty acids for energy much better then glucose. Only reason we run on insulin/glucose because we as a population we like grains and sugars. Doesnt mean it's good for you...hence why so many ppl have type 2 diabetes and methabolic syndrome. Eating vegetables and some fruit is def much better if you wish to eat carbs but it's really not enough to live on that alone hence adding fat will supply the rest of the nutritional calories along with protein.
Please stop arguing about this and read for god's sake because you sound ridiculous.
BTW, you dont know squat from any biological perspective because your answers lack any understanding of the material either practical or theoretical. The statement in which you said that there are no side effect from eating carbs proves that.
10-20-2012, 01:04 AM
It's pretty obvious your are writing from a subjective point of view. If you've ever read a biology book you would know that glucose is the main form of energy for humans which is preferred by the body by carbs. Eating too much of something is always going to turn out negative but I never said consuming high amounts of carbs doesn't provoke diabetes. There are so many different factors that play a role. Just because you have had limited success in your low carb diet doesn't make it right. There are no side effects from carbs if you eat healthy exercise and don't over eat.
10-20-2012, 01:13 AM
I'm glad that you can admit both sides of the argument. I just hate how there are so many rumors and lies within the nutritional world today. I'm happy I'm getting my information from textbooks and not the internet because every other site conflicts with each others research and information.Originally Posted by Jiigzz
10-20-2012, 05:14 AM
Also, general health textbooks place emphasis on health rather than performance and so much of their information that is directed at specific audiences has no real bearing on an 'athlete'. imo nothing beats a combination of text books and peer reviewed journals, so long as you dont just read the abstracts, but criticise the way they organsied/carried out/ selected subjects etc. to gauge just how reliable that information is. Something that will serve you well in your study at college, because not everything you see or every study you hear of was carried out without bias.
10-20-2012, 07:19 AM
I can tell you from experience that when you go to a doctor and blood glucose fasted is 100 or higher you understand very quickly what it means in theory to eat carbs and how real experience will change your mind very quickly.
Unfortunately, humans are not designed to burn 400-600g of carbs a day, everyday, for the rest of our life.
If you talk to ppl you will quickly realize that many, as they hit their 30's and 40's they are fat, slughish, and have the onset on type 2 diabetes. It's all over the news it's not a myth, it's a reality.
I know you are confused by all this but books have been and will be written that are wrong. My body runs as the main energy source on fat that means fatty acids and ketones. I do eat carbs but I burn glucose on a limited base as it is almost imposible for me to eat 3000calories in carbohydrates a day to sustain my activity level. Im perfectly healthy without any issues. If I were to listen to the mainstream I would be on some kind glucose meds and im not fat or laizy. Our bodies just cannot deal with eating carbs as main form of energy such as whole grains and sugars..it's that simple.
I agree with Jigzz in that 100-150g of carbs a day is ok to eat. But that's only about 500calories. Where are you going to get the rest from?
Let me know when you read your books
10-21-2012, 05:28 AM
10-21-2012, 11:16 AM
Similar Forum Threads
- By JayRock in forum Weight LossReplies: 0Last Post: 08-28-2011, 01:23 PM
- By Distilled Water in forum Weight LossReplies: 7Last Post: 08-12-2011, 08:10 PM
- By Zero V in forum Nutrition / HealthReplies: 10Last Post: 04-11-2010, 03:09 PM
- By Whacked in forum SupplementsReplies: 14Last Post: 12-25-2009, 04:15 PM
- By Skye in forum AnabolicsReplies: 3Last Post: 03-28-2008, 12:49 PM