Senate Confirms Alito for Supreme Court - AnabolicMinds.com

Senate Confirms Alito for Supreme Court

  1. Senior Member
    MaynardMeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Power
    676

    Reputation

    Senate Confirms Alito for Supreme Court


    Samuel Anthony Alito Jr., the son of an Italian immigrant and a longtime lawyer, prosecutor and judge, was confirmed as the 110th Supreme Court justice in one of the most partisan votes for a high court nominee in modern history.

  2. Banned
    Nullifidian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,741
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    I have mixed feelings about him.

    On one hand he seems all about limiting the power of the Federal government. He has repeatedly ruled against using interstate commerce laws to justify various bans and whatnot (the entire premise of the Federal DEA is centered on this).

    On the otherhand, he seems to think it is perfectly ok for the Federal government to spy on its own people without any warrants whatsoever. I'm rather confused at that one since on everything else he seems to be a very very strict Constitutional literalist. Yet his opinion on that seems to completely and totally ignore search and seizure laws set forth in the friggin Bill of Rights.
  3. CDB
    Registered User
    CDB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    38
    Posts
    4,543
    Rep Power
    2674

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Nullifidian
    I have mixed feelings about him.

    On one hand he seems all about limiting the power of the Federal government. He has repeatedly ruled against using interstate commerce laws to justify various bans and whatnot (the entire premise of the Federal DEA is centered on this).

    On the otherhand, he seems to think it is perfectly ok for the Federal government to spy on its own people without any warrants whatsoever. I'm rather confused at that one since on everything else he seems to be a very very strict Constitutional literalist. Yet his opinion on that seems to completely and totally ignore search and seizure laws set forth in the friggin Bill of Rights.
    Kind of like Bork, in that free speech applies to everything except pornography for some reason. When you read these justices' decisions basically they all torture and mangle logic at some point to reach a conclusion that's ideologically satisfying to them even if it's not quite in line with the spirit or letter of the law they're ruling on. All in all he might provide a curb on some abuses of government power, but he'll let some slide through for various reasons. In the end he won't rock the boat of the state significantly one way or the other I think.
    •   
       

  4. Banned
    Nullifidian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,741
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by CDB
    Kind of like Bork, in that free speech applies to everything except pornography for some reason. When you read these justices' decisions basically they all torture and mangle logic at some point to reach a conclusion that's ideologically satisfying to them even if it's not quite in line with the spirit or letter of the law they're ruling on. All in all he might provide a curb on some abuses of government power, but he'll let some slide through for various reasons. In the end he won't rock the boat of the state significantly one way or the other I think.
    Good point. I guess I was thrown off by the fact that a number of his decisions contradicted each other as far as political party goes but still adhered strictly to a literal interpretation of The Constitution. So I expected the same there.

    I suppose it means that his political bias on that issue does find its way through.
  5. Senior Member
    MaynardMeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Power
    676

    Reputation

    he is actually a very very solid justice... not many had anything against him.. it was a party line vote however... if they really thought this guy was going to rock the boat.. they would have thrown out all the stops to prevent it.... i mean.. how could they live with themselves knowing they did nothing to prevent his appointment....

    i think kerry's flubberbuster really hurt the democratic party for the next nomination.. and the next should really confuse people... either a black conservative judge, woman, black woman, or asian... whom ever it is.. she/he will be more of a constructionist than Alito, or Roberts
  6. New Member
    SubliminalX's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  185 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    254
    Rep Power
    238

    Reputation

    I think Alito is a good choice. I just don't know WTF Bush was thinking nominating Harriet Miers before considering Alito.
  7. Senior Member
    LCSULLA's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  197 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,759
    Rep Power
    1022

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by SubliminalX
    I think Alito is a good choice. I just don't know WTF Bush was thinking nominating Harriet Miers before considering Alito.
    Courting the women vote while still staying loyal to his gang. Whats funny about these convermations are that there is a history of Presidents nominating a guy/girl because he believes that this person is like him and they turn out to be completly different from what evrubody thought.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-28-2010, 09:47 AM
  2. New US Supreme Court Justice nominee named today
    By TheDeadlifter in forum Politics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-16-2010, 09:39 AM
  3. Supreme Court Bans Death Penalty for Child Rape
    By slow-mun in forum News and Articles
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 06-30-2008, 02:59 PM
  4. Supreme Court Bars commandments from courthouses.
    By Funny Monkey in forum Politics
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 08-19-2005, 08:20 AM
  5. Bushes new supreme court justice
    By UNDERTAKER in forum Politics
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 08-05-2005, 04:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in