Milk not suitable for human consumption? - AnabolicMinds.com

Milk not suitable for human consumption?

  1. Board Supporter
    IRserge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    254
    Rep Power
    243

    Reputation

    Milk not suitable for human consumption?


    I found this article on another forum and wanted to hear other opinions on it, especially Bobo's. I've drank milk since I was born and have had no problems.


    Cow’s Milk is the Perfect Food for Baby Calves
    But Many Doctors Agree:
    It is Not Healthy for Humans

    by Michael Dye
    People who have been taught that cow's milk is the "perfect food" may be shocked to hear many prominent medical doctors are now saying dairy consumption is a contributing factor in nearly two dozen diseases of children and adults.

    Doctors say cow's milk can lead to iron deficiency anemia, allergies, diarrhea, heart disease, colic, cramps, gastrointestinal bleeding, sinusitis, skin rashes, acne, increased frequency of colds and flu, arthritis, diabetes, ear infections, osteoporosis, asthma, autoimmune diseases, and more, possibly even lung cancer, multiple sclerosis and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

    In American society, one of the most sacred of all sacred cows is the milk of the cow itself. Cow's milk is more American than apple pie, but that's because apple pie doesn't have Congressional lobbyists and a multi-million dollar advertising budget. Most parents wouldn't think of raising their children without the benefit of cow's milk to help their little bones to grow big and strong. Its silky, white texture is the very epitome of our concept of wholesome purity.

    Our "nutritional education" in school (funded in part by the dairy industry) taught us that dairy products are one of the four basic food groups we all need for proper nutrition. And with more than 60 of the most powerful Congressional leaders in Washington receiving campaign contributions from the National Dairy Council, we can be assured that dairy products are well-entrenched as a major staple of our government-sponsored school lunch programs.

    Cow's milk is promoted as the "perfect food" for humans, and especially for our children. This advertising has put such a strong emphasis on the health of our children that some people view milk commercials as more of a public service announcement than an attempt to sell a product. These ads have told us "Milk is a Natural," "Everybody Needs Milk," "Milk is the Perfect Food," etc. This advertising has served its purpose well because the average American consumes 375 pounds of dairy products a year. One out of every seven dollars spent on groceries in the U.S. goes to buy dairy products.

    But to gauge the full impact of this promotion, we must consider more than just the dollar amount spent on dairy products. We must also consider the impact this massive advertising, promotion, lobbying, "nutritional education" and public relations effort has had by creating a widely-held perception of cow's milk as a very wholesome and healthy product. This promotion has been so effective that it is common for even people who give up meat to still feel that they should continue consuming dairy products to ensure they receive sufficient protein or calcium. People buy cow's milk for their families based on the premise that this product provides essential nutrition, helps to build a healthy body, and that indeed, their precious health may be in jeopardy if they do not drink milk.

    If this is the premise on which Americans spend an incredible chunk of their grocery bill to provide for the health and nutrition of their loved ones, we need to further examine this premise.

    Despite what the dairy industry has led us to believe, many medical doctors and nutritionists are now saying that cow's milk is not healthy for human consumption, and that it can lead to many serious diseases. When you look at the credentials of the doctors making these statements, it would be hard for the dairy industry to accuse these physicians of being on the lunatic fringe of the medical world.

    Frank Oski, M.D., author of Don't Drink Your Milk! is the Director of the Department of Pediatrics of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Physician-in-Chief of the Johns Hopkins Children's Center. He is the author, co-author, editor or co-editor of 19 medical textbooks and has written 290 medical manuscripts.

    In the first chapter of his book, Dr. Oski states, "The fact is: the drinking of cow milk has been linked to iron-deficiency anemia in infants and children; it has been named as the cause of cramps and diarrhea in much of the world's population, and the cause of multiple forms of allergy as well; and the possibility has been raised that it may play a central role in the origins of atherosclerosis and heart attacks."

    Dr. Oski comments, "Being against cow milk is equated with being un-American," but still he notes, "Among physicians, so much concern has been voiced about the potential hazards of cow milk that the Committee on Nutrition of the prestigious American Academy of Pediatrics, the institutional voice of practicing pediatricians, released a report entitled, 'Should Milk Drinking by Children Be Discouraged?' Although the Academy's answer to this question has (as of this writing) been a qualified 'maybe,' the fact that the question was raised at all is testimony to the growing concern about this product, which for so long was viewed as sacred as the proverbial goodness of mother and apple pie."


    Another outspoken critic of cow's milk is Dr. William Ellis, a retired osteopathic physician and surgeon in Arlington, Texas, who has researched the effects of dairy products for 42 years. Dr. Ellis is listed in Marquis' Who's Who in the East, Leaders of American Science, the Dictionary of International Biography and Two Thousand Men of Achievement. Dr. Ellis says dairy products are "simply no good for humans... There is overwhelming evidence that milk and milk products are harmful to many people, both adults and infants. Milk is a contributing factor in constipation, chronic fatigue, arthritis, headaches, muscle cramps, obesity, allergies and heart problems."

    When Washington D.C.-based pediatrician Dr. Russell Bunai was asked what single change in the American diet would produce the greatest health benefit, his answer was, "Eliminating dairy products."

    Dr. Christiane Northrup, a gynecologist in Yarmouth, Maine, states, "Dairy is a tremendous mucus producer and a burden on the respiratory, digestive and immune systems." Dr. Northrup says when patients "eliminate dairy products for an extended period and eat a balanced diet, they suffer less from colds and sinus infections."

    Dr. Oski's book includes a letter written by Dr. J. Dan Baggett, a pediatrician in Alabama who describes his experience after six years of recommending that all his patients eliminate cow's milk from their diets. He writes, "In general, they cooperate much better than I had earlier anticipated except for the pre-teenagers and teenagers." Dr. Baggett's letter, states in part:

    "During the years 1963 through 1967, I referred an average of four appendectomy cases per year. During the past five and a half years, I have referred only two patients for appendectomy, the last one being three years ago. Both of these children were professed milk guzzlers.

    "I do not have a single patient with active asthma. In fact, I have nearly forgotten how to prescribe for them.

    "Perhaps the most significant thing I have learned is that Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus germ will not, under ordinary circumstances, establish an infection in a child kept on an absolutely no-milk-protein dietary regimen. I have been aware of this for the past two and a half years and, so far, there have been no exceptions. Any time a patient of mine is found to have streptococcal pharyngitis or pyoderma, we can establish by history that he has ingested milk protein within five days prior to onset of symptoms or signs bringing him to the office.

    "I now admit an average of 12-14 patients per year to the hospital. Their average hospital stay is three days. Between 1963 and 1967, I admitted an average of 100+ patients to the hospital per year. Their average stay was five days."

    So how can all these medical statements be explained in light of what we have been taught all of our life about milk? Remember "Milk is the Perfect Food"... "Milk is a Natural"... "Everybody Needs Milk." Are we talking about the same food here?

    Perhaps we are not. It would appear that promoters of cow's milk are creating advertising statements that are meant to appeal on a subconscious level to our positive feelings and experiences with human breast milk. All mammals, including humans, are intended to be nourished during infancy by milk from their mother. Part of the very definition of a mammal is that the female of the species has milk-producing glands in her breasts which provide nourishment for her young. Each species of mammal produces its unique type of milk designed specifically to strengthen the immune system and provide nourishment for their babies, which are weaned after their birth weight has approximately tripled.

    So, absolutely yes, "milk is a natural"... in the proper context. It is perfectly natural for infant mammals, including humans, to be nourished exclusively by milk from their mother's breasts. So if we are talking about human breast milk for babies, yes, "milk is the perfect food." And yes, during infancy when we have no teeth for eating solid food, and as we need to strengthen our immune system, "everybody needs milk."

    I have just quoted three of the most popular advertising slogans of the dairy industry and they are indisputably as true as any words that could be spoken on the subject of nutrition... if they are applied to a baby's need for human breast milk. In fact, not one of the doctors I have quoted in describing the terrible problems caused by cow's milk would disagree that milk is a natural, milk is the perfect food or that everybody needs milk, in this context.

    But whoa.

    The dairy industry has begun with these three statements that we all know are true about a baby's need for human breast milk, and twisted them out of context to apply them to a completely different product they are selling. And the sad result is that most Americans still think these noble statements about our babies needing to suckle their mother's breast milk are true when applied to the advertising claim that humans of all ages need to buy and drink cow's milk.

    So, in an effort to undo the damage caused by this manipulation, let us consider the differences in human breast milk versus cow's milk, and further examine the physical problems caused by humans trying to subsist on the milk of another species well past the age when any mammal should be drinking any milk.

    (back to The Hallelujah Diet)

    A good place to start in analyzing the distinction between milk of different species is to begin to understand how nature works. As Dr. Oski explains in Don't Drink Your Milk!, "The milk of each species appears to have been specifically designed to protect the young of that species. Cross-feeding does not work. Heating, sterilization, or modification of the milk in any way destroys the protection."

    So, how much of a difference is there between a human baby drinking the milk of its mother versus drinking the milk of a cow? Dr. Oski cites a "study of over twenty thousand infants conducted in Chicago as far back as the 1930s... The overall death rate for the babies raised on human milk was 1.5 deaths per 1,000 infants while the death rate in the babies fed cow milk was 84.7 per 1,000 during the first nine months of life. The death rate from gastrointestinal infections was forty times higher in the non-breast-fed infants, while the death rate from respiratory infections was 120 times higher. An earlier analysis involving infants in eight American cities showed similar results. Infants fed on cow milk had a twenty times greater chance of dying during the first six months of life."

    Dr. Michael Taylor, a Chiropractic Physician, doctoral candidate to become a Doctor of Nutrition and fellow of the American Academy of Orthomolecular Medicine, agrees, stating, "It is a dietary error to cross species to get milk from another animal." He notes there is a tremendous difference between human babies and baby calves, and a corresponding difference between the milk that is intended to nourish human babies and baby calves. In an interview on "Let's Eat," a Seventh-day Adventist television program, Dr. Taylor notes that human infants take about 180 days to double their birth weight, and that human milk is 5 to 7 percent protein. Calves require only 45 days to double their birth weight and cow's milk is 15 percent protein.

    In addition to the difference in the amount of protein in these two different types of milk, there are also major differences in the composition of this protein. The primary type of protein in cow's milk is casein. Cow's milk has 20 times as much casein as human milk, which makes the protein from cow's milk difficult or impossible for humans to assimilate, according to Dr. John R. Christopher, N.D., M.H.

    Protein composes 15 percent of the human body and when this protein cannot be properly broken down, it weakens the immune system, causing allergies and many other problems. Allergies caused by cow's milk are extremely common. In fact, Dr. Taylor states that when a single food can be isolated as the cause of an allergy, 60 percent of the time, that food is cow's milk. Dr. Ellis notes that symptoms of this allergic reaction to cow's milk in infants can include asthma, nasal congestion, skin rash, chest infections, irritability and fatigue.

    Dr. Oski's book cites evidence from Dr. Joyce Gryboski, director of the Pediatric Gastrointestinal Clinic at Yale University School of Medicine, who states "they see at least one child a week who is referred for evaluation of chronic diarrhea and proves to have nothing more than an allergy to cow milk."

    Another reason many people suffer various symptoms of disease from drinking milk is that, according to Dr. Oski, the majority of the world's adult population is "lactose intolerant," meaning they cannot digest lactose, the sugar in milk (cow's milk and human milk). An enzyme known as lactase is required to digest lactose, and Dr. Oski states that "between the age of one and a half and four years most individuals gradually lose the lactase activity in their small intestine. This appears to be a normal process that accompanies maturation.... Most people do it. All animals do it. It reflects the fact that nature never intended lactose-containing foods, such as milk, to be consumed after the normal weaning period."

    In fact, so many people have bad reactions to drinking cow's milk that in 1974 the Federal Trade Commission felt compelled to take legal action against advertising claims made by the California Milk Producers. The ads claimed "Everybody Needs Milk." The FTC prosecuted the milk producers for "false, misleading and deceptive" advertising. The FTC complaint cited the high incidence of lactose intolerance, allergies caused by cow's milk and the increased risk of heart disease. The FTC won and the milk producers had to come up with a new slogan for their ads: "Milk Has Something for Everybody."

    One medical researcher, Dr. Kevin McGrady, commented, "Milk has something for everybody all right -- higher blood cholesterol, and increased risk of heart disease and stroke."

    Three reasons cited by medical researchers that dairy products contribute to heart disease are their high content of cholesterol and fat, along with an enzyme in cow's milk called xanthine oxidase (XO). This enzyme, which creates problems only when milk is homogenized, causes heart disease by damaging arteries. Explaining the significance of XO, Dr. Ellis cites research by Dr. Kurt Oster, Chief of Cardiology at Park City Hospital in Bridgeport, Connecticut:

    "From 1971 to 1974, we studied 75 patients with angina pectoris (chest pain due to heart disease) and arteriosclerosis (hardening of the arteries). All the patients were taken off milk and given folic acid (a B-vitamin) and ascorbic acid (vitamin C), both of which combat the action of XO. The results were dramatic. Chest pains decreased, symptoms lessened, and each of those patients is doing great today."

    Dr. Oster's article states that Dr. Kurt Esselbacher, Chairman of the Department of the Harvard Medical School, was in full agreement. Dr. Esselbacher writes: "Homogenized milk, because of its XO content, is one of the major causes of heart disease in the U.S."

    Dr. Oski warns, "The consumption of cow milk from an early age may have life-long consequences... One pathologist has reviewed the heart vessels of over 1,500 children and adolescents who had died as a result of accidents.... These children and adolescents had not died as a result of disease, yet many of them showed signs of diseased arteries in the heart.... The majority of children with normal blood vessels had been breast-fed; the majority of children with diseased vessels had been fed cow milk or cow milk based formulas. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that the differences between human milk and cow milk were responsible for the early changes in the coronary arteries."

    But don't we need to drink milk to get calcium? No. The best way to add calcium to your diet is to eat more fresh green vegetables. Cow's milk is high in calcium, but Dr. Ellis explains, the problem is that it is in a form that cannot be assimilated very well by humans. Dr. Ellis states, "Thousands and thousands of blood tests I've conducted show that people who drink 3 or 4 glasses of milk a day invariably had the lowest levels of blood calcium."

    Dr. Ellis adds, "Low levels of blood calcium correspond with irritability and headaches. In addition, the low calcium level in milk-drinkers also explains why milk-drinkers are prone to have muscle spasms and cramps. Since calcium is necessary for muscles to relax, a lack of calcium causes muscle cramps, etc."

    One of the most serious problems caused by a calcium deficiency is osteoporosis, a condition characterized by the loss of 50 to 75 percent of the person's original bone material. In the U.S., 25 percent of 65-year-old women suffer from osteoporosis. Their bones become brittle and easily broken. They can crack a rib from something as minor as a sneeze.

    Our pervasive dairy advertising has led to one of the most commonly held, and solidly disproved, fallacies about bones, which is that the best way to build strong bones is to increase calcium consumption by drinking plenty of milk. Actually, the consensus among leading medical researchers is that the best way for most people to increase their calcium level and strengthen their bones is to reduce their protein intake, and specifically to reduce consumption of animal products. Research has conclusively shown we can do more to increase the calcium level in our bones by reducing protein intake than by increasing calcium intake. The reason is that animal products and other sources of high protein are very acidic, and the blood stream must balance this acidic condition by absorbing alkaline minerals such as calcium from the bone structure. Thus, numerous studies, including those published in the Aug. 22, 1984 Medical Tribune and the March 1983 Journal of Clinical Nutrition, have found that vegetarians have much stronger bones than meat-eaters. Indeed, the Journal of Clinical Nutrition article found that by age 65, meat-eaters had five to six times as much measurable bone loss as vegetarians.

    Speaking of minerals, another serious problem caused by consumption of cow's milk is iron-deficiency anemia. Dr. Oski notes that 15 to 20 percent of children under age 2 in the U.S. suffer from iron-deficiency anemia. Cow's milk contributes to this condition in two ways.

    First, he notes that cow's milk is extremely low in iron, containing less than 1 milligram of iron per quart. Because of this, he writes that it is estimated that a 1-year-old would need to drink 24 quarts of cow's milk a day to meet his iron requirements, which would be impossible. He states many infants may drink from one to two quarts of cow's milk a day, which satisfies their hunger to the point that they do no have the appetite to consume enough of other foods that do have a high iron content.

    The second way that cow's milk leads to iron-deficiency anemia in many infants is a form of gastrointestinal bleeding caused by increased mucus and diarrhea associated with dairy consumption. "It is estimated that half the iron-deficiency in infants in the United States is primarily the result of this form of cow milk induced gastrointestinal bleeding," Dr. Oski writes. "Mucus is frequent and some stools contain obvious traces of bright red blood... The diarrhea impairs the infant's ability to retain nutrients from his feedings. In addition, the changes produced in the gastrointestinal tract by the allergic reaction result in seepage of the child's own blood into the gut. This loss of plasma and red cells leads to a lowering of the infant's blood protein level and to the development of anemia."

    (back to The Hallelujah Diet)

    The mucus created by dairy products causes other problems as well. It is well-known that dairy products cause excessive mucus in the lungs, sinuses and intestines. Dr. Ellis notes this excess mucus in the breathing passages contributes to many respiratory problems and that mucus hardens to form a coating on the inner wall of the intestines that leads to poor absorption of nutrients, which can cause chronic fatigue. This mucus also causes constipation, which can lead to many other problems.

    Two very common problems with infants are colic and ear infections, both of which can be caused by cow's milk. Medical studies have found cow's milk can contribute to these problems either directly, when the infant drinks cow's milk, or indirectly, when the infant breast feeds from a mother who has been consuming dairy products.

    Colic, suffered by one out of every five infants in the U.S., is characterized by severe stomach cramps. The July/August 1994 issue of Natural Health reports, "When a mother eats dairy products, milk proteins pass into her breast milk and end up in the baby's blood; some studies have found that cow's milk proteins (from milk drunk by the mother) might trigger colic-like symptoms in infants fed only human milk and no cow's milk."

    Concerning ear infections, Dr. Northrup states, "You just don't see this painful condition among infants and children who aren't getting cow's milk into their systems."

    The Natural Health article also notes, "Removing dairy from the diet has been shown to shrink enlarged tonsils and adenoids, indicating relief for the immune system. Similarly, doctors experimenting with dairy-free diets often report a marked reduction in colds, flu, sinusitis and ear infections."

    Another common problem for children is the bellyache. Dr. Oski states in his book that up to 10 percent of all children in this country suffer from a syndrome known as "recurrent abdominal pain of childhood." He says studies performed in Boston and San Francisco each concluded "that about one-third of such children had their symptoms on the basis of lactose intolerance. The simple solution was to remove all milk and milk-containing foods from the diet and watch for signs of improvement."

    The Natural Health article also notes that antigens in cow's milk may contribute to arthritis and osteoarthritis. "When antibody-antigen complexes (resulting from an immune response) are deposited in the joints, pain, swelling, redness and stiffness result; these complexes increase in arthritic people who eat dairy products, and the pain fades rapidly after patients eliminate dairy products from their diets. In a study published in Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, when people with rheumatoid arthritis fasted on water, fruit and vegetable juices, and tea for seven to ten days, their joint pain and stiffness were greatly reduced. When they ate a lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet (including only milk and eggs as animal foods), the symptoms became aggravated and they remained ill."

    A 1992 report in The New England Journal of Medicine also notes that cow's milk can contribute to juvenile diabetes and autoimmune diseases by impairing the ability of the pancreas to produce insulin.

    The Natural Health article also states a 1989 study published in Nutrition and Cancer found a link between consumption of cow's milk and butter with the risk of developing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a cancer of the immune system. The article adds, "High levels of the cow's milk protein beta-lactoglobulin have also been found in the blood of lung cancer patients, suggesting a link with this cancer as well."

    Dr. Oski's book also cites studies by two scientists from the University of Michigan who have conducted extensive research on factors associated with multiple sclerosis. There is an unusual geographic distribution of MS victims in the U.S. and throughout the world, which has baffled medical researchers for decades. This distribution of MS victims has no correlation to wealth, education or quality of medical care. Dr. Oski notes the Michigan scientists found in this pattern in the U.S. and 21 other countries, "the only significant link was between multiple sclerosis and average milk consumption."

    Dr. Oski's book even cites a possible link between excessive consumption of cow's milk and juvenile delinquency, based on a study conducted in Tacoma, Wash. Dr. Oski writes, "When the diets of young criminals were contrasted with those of adolescents from a similar background, it was found that the juvenile delinquents consumed almost ten times the amount of milk that was drunk by the control group. The juvenile offenders ate less fruit, nuts and vegetables."

    When a reasonable person considers all this evidence, it would be difficult to still believe cow's milk is healthy for human consumption. So, what do we drink instead? Dr. Oski partly answers this question by writing, "For the newborn infant, there are two obvious alternatives -- the right and left breast of the healthy mother."

    After a child is weaned, there is no reason to drink any milk. We shouldn't drink any liquid with our meals because this dilutes our digestive fluids. When we are thirsty, we should drink distilled water. Or, if you want to drink something nutritional between meals, the best choice is freshly-extracted vegetable juice.

  2. Banned
    poopypants's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    9,204
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    ya i dont know about this. i remember when i was a kid that the new thing was apple juice gave you cancer.... it was my favorite.... needless to say i wasnt a happy toddler. LMAO

    but for real very good read and very interesting/informative, thanks for posting. but i think that ill do a l ittle more homework on it myself before i cut milk from my diet.
  3. Registered User
    Pioneer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    964
    Rep Power
    596

    Reputation

    that huge bowl of cereal i just had was great...

    everything nowadays is bad for you though, but we still eat.

    good read/find though.
    •   
       

  4. Professional Member
    size's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Age
    42
    Posts
    4,232
    Rep Power
    2267

    Reputation

    Cow milk certainly is not intended for humans, but this is the information presented by "anti" people. While I drink milk, I believe that if humans needed to consume milk into adulthood then women would lactate for much longer. Consequently, I do limit myself.
  5. Board Sponsor
    bigpetefox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,685
    Rep Power
    2016

    Reputation

    I drink rice milk exclusively..
  6. New Member
    BigDick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    159

    Reputation

    "We shouldn't drink any liquid with our meals because this dilutes our digestive fluids."

    Wow... lots of radical ideas. When I don't drink anything with my meals, I get really bad hiccups. If it were evolutionarily beneficial not to drink anything with your meals, perhaps our bodies would get some warning.
  7. New Member
    Mr.Striation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Age
    32
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    177

    Reputation

    I drink about 1 gallon of Skim milk a day except for about 2 months before a competition, and I do not get sick often at all, have no allergies, no asthma, and I have regular bowel movement.
  8. Banned
    Jordan338's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  260 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    15
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    Not sure if that article said this or not but cow milk also contains a hormone IGF-1 I believe that is a hormone only us an cows share and they're saying it leads to some forms of cancer
  9. Banned
    poopypants's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    9,204
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDick
    "We shouldn't drink any liquid with our meals because this dilutes our digestive fluids."

    Wow... lots of radical ideas. When I don't drink anything with my meals, I get really bad hiccups. If it were evolutionarily beneficial not to drink anything with your meals, perhaps our bodies would get some warning.
    ya thats about the most retarted thing ive ever read... true there is a slight diluting but how else do you expect those nutrients to be transported without it? it'd be like pourin gravy through a coffee filter.
  10. I am faster than 80% of all snakes
    Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,911
    Rep Power
    7016

    Reputation

    Whole milk is pretty bad in the long run. It does have an enormous amount of impurities. The IGF-1 aspect is completely bogus though. First is woudln't survive processing and also can't be absorbed when ingested.

    Skim Milk is great though.
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  11. New Member
    ballzasteel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    33
    Posts
    35
    Rep Power
    146

    Reputation

    i thought drinking distilled water is bad for you and can lead to death because it absorbs all the minerals in your body?
  12. Advanced Member
    -2z-'s Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  190 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    43
    Posts
    736
    Rep Power
    499

    Reputation

    I used to drink skim milk like it was the last gallon ever made. You couldn't keep it in the fridge at my house years ago.

    Now I just have it usually on a cheat day once a week or something. It seems to be easier for me to reach my goals that way. Other than that, I've never had a problem with it though.
  13. Banned
    blam's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    38
    Posts
    16
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    I've often heard that Goat's Milk is very good for humans. It's hard to find Goat's Milk in the grocery store though, and when you do it's only in quart sizes. Has anyone else heard or read good stuff about Goat's Milks?
  14. Elite Member
    Matthew D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    5,014
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDick
    "We shouldn't drink any liquid with our meals because this dilutes our digestive fluids."

    Wow... lots of radical ideas. When I don't drink anything with my meals, I get really bad hiccups.
    to do this, you have to take a much longer time chewing your food. not that I am saying that you are eating to fast but as a entire good, I think that we more than likely do "wolf" down our food way to much.. I know I do.. mainly due to job and habits developed in the Army
  15. New Member
    warriorway's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  175 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Age
    37
    Posts
    475
    Rep Power
    357

    Reputation

    What a crock! They said milk causes multiple sclerosis, Doctors don't have a clue what causes that!
  16. Banned
    jomi822's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    32
    Posts
    2,419
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    i started drinking cows milk when i was a month old. Since then it is more or less the staple of my entire diet. i consumer 1.5 to 2 gallons a day, about half of which is mixed in protein shakes. I have never had any allergies whatsoever, i dont have acne, im pretty damn sure i dont have osteroperosis. When i started lifting my sophomore year of high school i was consuming one gallon of milk a day and in my first 4 months of lifting i put on 35lbs of lean mass, going from 185-220. I was not a regular meat eater and didnt even know protein shakes existed. I highly doubt we cannot absord casein protein, which i owe most of my overall gains to. This article is bogus. ill tell you when i start getting some gastrointestinal bleeding. They make milk sound like liquified saturated fat mixed with sulfuric acid.
  17. Banned
    poopypants's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    9,204
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by jomi822
    i started drinking cows milk when i was a month old. Since then it is more or less the staple of my entire diet. i consumer 1.5 to 2 gallons a day, about half of which is mixed in protein shakes. I have never had any allergies whatsoever, i dont have acne, im pretty damn sure i dont have osteroperosis. When i started lifting my sophomore year of high school i was consuming one gallon of milk a day and in my first 4 months of lifting i put on 35lbs of lean mass, going from 185-220. I was not a regular meat eater and didnt even know protein shakes existed. I highly doubt we cannot absord casein protein, which i owe most of my overall gains to. This article is bogus. ill tell you when i start getting some gastrointestinal bleeding. They make milk sound like liquified saturated fat mixed with sulfuric acid.
    haha ya true that the first 25 lbs i ever gained was off creatine a little protien and a gallon of egg nog a day. thank goodness for a high metabolism.
  18. Registered User
    Pioneer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    964
    Rep Power
    596

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by jomi822
    i started drinking cows milk when i was a month old. Since then it is more or less the staple of my entire diet. i consumer 1.5 to 2 gallons a day, about half of which is mixed in protein shakes. I have never had any allergies whatsoever, i dont have acne, im pretty damn sure i dont have osteroperosis. When i started lifting my sophomore year of high school i was consuming one gallon of milk a day and in my first 4 months of lifting i put on 35lbs of lean mass, going from 185-220. I was not a regular meat eater and didnt even know protein shakes existed. I highly doubt we cannot absord casein protein, which i owe most of my overall gains to. This article is bogus. ill tell you when i start getting some gastrointestinal bleeding. They make milk sound like liquified saturated fat mixed with sulfuric acid.
    i dont believe you consumed 2 gallons of milk a day, you wouldn't have any room to eat.
  19. Banned
    poopypants's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    9,204
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    belive it man theres plenty room, i drink 6-8 liters of water a day and still put away 3800 kcals no prob, now i know thats not milk but still.
  20. New Member
    sean_25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    52
    Rep Power
    135

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by poopypants
    belive it man theres plenty room, i drink 6-8 liters of water a day and still put away 3800 kcals no prob, now i know thats not milk but still.

    when you cut??
  21. New Member
    shoestring's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    47
    Posts
    26
    Rep Power
    124

    Reputation

    Smile


    Sounds like liberal propaganda nonsense. Study prolly funded by peta or moveon.org or something. lol.. If people don't want to dring milk good for them, the but they need to shut the f up.. Just my humble opinion.
  22. Registered User
    Beowulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,430
    Rep Power
    2150

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobo
    Whole milk is pretty bad in the long run. It does have an enormous amount of impurities. The IGF-1 aspect is completely bogus though. First is woudln't survive processing and also can't be absorbed when ingested.

    Skim Milk is great though.
    That is a good point about the IGF-1 not surviving processing, but could the incomplete chain cause any harmful effects despite the fact it would not work the way it is supposed to?
  23. Senior Member
    chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,213
    Rep Power
    3818

    Reputation

    According to vegetarians, which I feel is the healthiest way to go that is if you want to be a healthy 130lber. Anyhow according to vegetarians the human body wasnt even designed to eat meat,(not my idea) think about all the other species who eat meat, they all pant of sweat through there tongue, like a dog or cat, they also lick there liquids instead of sucking on them, like horses. As far as milk goes humans were supposed to stop drinking milk once they tripled in size like all other herbivores. These are not my thoughts I believe the name of the famous vegan is Dr. Jim or John Mcdougall
  24. Registered User
    TheCrownedOne's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,362
    Rep Power
    802

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by b_delgros
    According to vegetarians, which I feel is the healthiest way to go that is if you want to be a healthy 130lber. Anyhow according to vegetarians the human body wasnt even designed to eat meat,(not my idea) think about all the other species who eat meat, they all pant of sweat through there tongue, like a dog or cat, they also lick there liquids instead of sucking on them, like horses. As far as milk goes humans were supposed to stop drinking milk once they tripled in size like all other herbivores. These are not my thoughts I believe the name of the famous vegan is Dr. Jim or John Mcdougall
    Whoever said that has lost their face. If we weren't designed to eat meat then our bodies wouldn't digest it. Lame.
  25. New Member
    BigDick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    159

    Reputation

    Not supposed to eat meat? Does that idiot know why humans don't pant/sweat through their tongue? It's because we sweat instead. Why do we sweat instead? Because long ago, primates moved into the much hotter grasslands, where they shedded their hair and stood upright (less direct heat) to protect against the harsh sunlight. Standing upright also allowed humans to use tools for -- you guessed it -- hunting.

    ****, the ability to eat meat is part of the reason humans are where they are today. If humans weren't meant to eat meat, we wouldn't have evolved to have more generalized teeth for meat/plants.

    Anyone who knows anything about anthropology and the evolution of man will tell you:

    IF OUR ANCESTORS DIDN'T EAT MEAT WE WOULDN'T BE HUMAN TODAY!
  26. Registered User
    Beowulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,430
    Rep Power
    2150

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDick
    Standing upright also allowed humans to use tools for -- you guessed it -- weight training.
    Big Dick, I hope you don't mind, I just made a slight correction here
  27. Board Sponsor
    velikimajmun's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    36
    Posts
    148
    Rep Power
    189

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by b_delgros
    According to vegetarians, which I feel is the healthiest way to go that is if you want to be a healthy 130lber. Anyhow according to vegetarians the human body wasnt even designed to eat meat,(not my idea) think about all the other species who eat meat, they all pant of sweat through there tongue, like a dog or cat, they also lick there liquids instead of sucking on them, like horses. As far as milk goes humans were supposed to stop drinking milk once they tripled in size like all other herbivores. These are not my thoughts I believe the name of the famous vegan is Dr. Jim or John Mcdougall
    Next time someone says that, ask them to show you an herbivore with incisors.
  28. Banned
    Nullifidian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,741
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    This article was written by vegans and likely funded by soy farmers.
  29. I am faster than 80% of all snakes
    Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,911
    Rep Power
    7016

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Beowulf
    That is a good point about the IGF-1 not surviving processing, but could the incomplete chain cause any harmful effects despite the fact it would not work the way it is supposed to?
    No.
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  30. Board Supporter
    rhinochaser48's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    310
    Rep Power
    290

    Reputation

    Milk can cause problems in many, including myself. I'm not completely against it, but here is an interesting study done on mycobacterium paratuberculosis, which is not killed off by pasturization:

    http://www.mad-cow.org/00/paraTB.html

    It's long, but it contains a lot of information about milk, the dairy industry, and the USDA's involvement in this.
  31. Banned
    Nullifidian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,741
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    I don't really understand the huge focus on "organic" products these days. People used to get sick all the time from fruits, vegetables, and meats before we used pesticides and anti-biotics on the stuff.
  32. New Member
    Vtaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Age
    37
    Posts
    157
    Rep Power
    191

    Reputation

    IRserge, thank you for posting this article. True, the milk purchased at the grocery store has no value for us, but what the article failed to illustrate, is that the "milk" is not the real problem, its what the dairy industry has done to milk that is the problem. Raw, organic milk(right out of the cows tit), from free roaming grass fed cows, posseses all of the health benefits the dairy industry boasts. Around 1900, the dairy industry had grown substantailly, and there were many farmers producing milk in incredibly unsanitary conditions; people started getting sick. In in effort to sanitize the milk, the pasteurization process was developed to eliminate potentialy harmfull bacteria. The pasteurization process involves heating the milk for 30 seconds at 145 degrees, 15 seconds at 162, and 1 second at 192. The milk is declared pasteurized when a chemist finds no enzymes present in the milk. Enzymes are complex proteins that aid in the digestion of milk.The heat also alters aminos acids making the protein less available, up to 80% of water soluble vitamins are lost, b12 is totaly lost, and without enzymes, all that amazing calcium is difficult to absorb. Raw milk containes lactic acid producing bacteria that protects against pathogens, pasteurized milk has no protective mechanism if its contaminated after the process, keep in mind, all the salmonella outbreaks that have occurred in recent decades have come from pasteurized milk.
    Supply and demand has also harmed milk quality. Farmers routinly give milk cows an fda approved hormone called Prosilac. This drug extends the milking cycle up to 8-12 weeks beyond normal. Cows, like humans, produce milk at the expense of there own tissue, so the longer the milking cycle, the weaker the cows become. Prosilac increases a cows chance of deveolping a condition called mastitis(inflamation of the udder) by as much as 80%, and is stated on the products warning label. So to combat sick cows, the fda approved 30 antibiotics, and another 50 are suspected to be used illegally. The food fed to cows(milk and beef cows) is often low quality as well. Farmers routinly have to find ways to cut costs, and are generally more interested in finding feed that will simply fatten the cows up, even if it is not nutritious what so ever. Some farmers have been found adding cardboard, newspaper and sawdust to cattle feed simply for this reason. Now I know many of you are reading this, and are in the "I drink 5 gallons of whole milk every day, have never gotten sick, carry 'crazy' off season 'mass' and can leap tall buildings in a single bound" club. Guys, I founded that club, but gave up milk 3 years ago and Im bigger, leaner and stronger than ever. Now just because milk doesnt make us violently ill is not a reasonable defense, how many of you have traveled to another country and gotten sick from their food, while the natives are doing just fine? Last year, my wife and were in the caribbean, and she started feeling sick the day we left, and had to go to the hospital immediatly upon our return. She was there for two days, and had gotten some common virus found in the food there, funny thing though, We ate the exact same stuff, I ate much more , and never had any problems, but was very likely exposed to the same bug. So just because you tolerate something, doesnt mean its harmless, do your own research, and try cutting milk out and spending the money on some good, organic steaks and see how you feel. Just my 2 cents, not trying to argue with anyone.
  33. New Member
    Vtaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Age
    37
    Posts
    157
    Rep Power
    191

    Reputation

    I see rhinochaser has linked an article while i was writing mine, it probaly has much of the same info, but I will leave my original post anyway.
  34. Registered User
    Nabeshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    287
    Rep Power
    261

    Reputation

    Ja, this is the bull ****. Another mountain which should be a molehill.

    News flash: some people are lactose intolerant.

    Anyway, this article is basically just argumentum ad hominem in reverse. I could probably write a script to generate any given paragraph in this paper. The format is simple.

    Dr. <name>, <list of credentials>, <more credentials>, (<optional sly jab at evil dairy industry for daring to doubt someone with such credentials>), wrote a paper pubilshed in <prestigious journal>, stating that <milk is teh sukc>.

    Hell, the tone gets set very early in the paper:

    Despite what the dairy industry has led us to believe, many medical doctors and nutritionists are now saying that cow's milk is not healthy for human consumption, and that it can lead to many serious diseases. When you look at the credentials of the doctors making these statements, it would be hard for the dairy industry to accuse these physicians of being on the lunatic fringe of the medical world.

    As an aside, this conspiracy of the dairy overlords thing is just plain weird, man. Just plain weird. Did picking on the "Bush regime's cabal of evil" lose it's appeal, or something?

    If I was a monkey, I'd poop in my hand and fling it at these hippies.
  35. New Member
    BigDick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    159

    Reputation

    Haha... sometimes I wonder who I hate more -- tree-hugging hippy liberal cultists, or racist jesus freak rednecks. I think I hate Pat Robertson and co. a little bit more than these people.
  36. Registered User
    Nabeshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    287
    Rep Power
    261

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDick
    Haha... sometimes I wonder who I hate more -- tree-hugging hippy liberal cultists, or racist jesus freak rednecks. I think I hate Pat Robertson and co. a little bit more than these people.
    My vehemence for both parties is equal.
  37. New Member
    Cosmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    215
    Rep Power
    250

    Reputation

    im with rhinochaser and vtaper, milk has also caused me many problems (and im not lactose intolerant or allergic), which went away when i stopped eating dairy. There is many problems with milk, it just isnt what it was ment to be anymore (unhealthy animals and quick fixes). Im gonna gonna get myself a personal cow someday and feed it well and suck straight from the teet
  38. Banned
    poopypants's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    9,204
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Cosmo
    Im gonna gonna get myself a personal cow someday and feed it well and suck straight from the teet

    drink up
  39. Registered User
    Beowulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,430
    Rep Power
    2150

    Reputation

    I have read that milk is extremely hyperallergenic, but I've gone through periods of consuming more than 1/4 per day w/o any issues whatsoever. I love milk (skim) and milk loves me
  40. Registered User
    Nabeshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Age
    30
    Posts
    287
    Rep Power
    261

    Reputation

    I'm getting the same vibe from this that I get from "environmental illness." Feels a lot like a bowel movement, if you ask me.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. This is not for human use...
    By Ironclad in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-27-2006, 12:42 AM
  2. not for human consumption
    By paul3371 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 02-10-2004, 10:36 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-22-2003, 12:08 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-27-2003, 07:18 PM
  5. Quality Strength for Human Athletic Performance
    By YellowJacket in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-17-2003, 06:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in