Bruce Lee: Legend or Myth?
- 05-10-2007, 02:23 PM
Bruce Lee: Legend or Myth?
Was this guy an okay martial artist and a great movie star or was he really the grandfather of MMA? I've heard some of the alleged stories about his street fights are BS or blown out of proportion. I read a thread on sherdog with a lot of conflicting opinions about his role in martial arts, the development of MMA, and his "no style is the best style" philosophy. But sherdog is sherdog, so what do you guys think?
- 05-10-2007, 03:45 PM
Regardless of how good an actual fighter he was or how good of an actor he was... I think that he was the grandfather of MMA as his whole martial art paradigm was based on effectiveness. He didn't care where a particular technique or movement came from, if it worked for him then he made it part of his repertoire. JKD as Bruce Lee taugh can be summed up in these words (Bruce Lee's words) "absorb what is useful, reject what is useless, and add specifically what is your own..."
That is what MMA is all about.
05-10-2007, 04:03 PM
Bruce Lee is a legend.
Some people seemingly want to bad mouth him while others want to make him an individual of god like stature. The truth is simple, Bruce Lee was an amazing martial artist who took a revolutionary approach to martial arts and training.
For people who want to dismiss Bruce Lee, I would suggest going and training with Dan Inosanto or attending one of his seminars. At 70+ years of age Inosanto is still incredible and he will state that Bruce Lee was amazing martial artist with unbelievable speed, vision, and power.
05-11-2007, 02:57 PM
Bruce Lee was the best. You should watch some of his movies. "Enter The Dragon" is the best. There is also a documentry on him thats on cable a lot of times. I forget what channel but it is on a lot. The show the making of "Enter The Dragon" and a lot of other movies, thats not even half of what they include though. I don't think he would want anything to do with how commercialized martial arts has become today. Martial Arts were meant for self-defense not kicking each others ass in a cage!. Thats just dis-respectful to the arts and ignorant.
05-11-2007, 04:28 PM
Nice response, Sikdogg. I like your answer. I was hoping you'd chime in too Size since I noticed you posted a few Bruce clips in the multimedia thread. Thanks.
T-bone, I've seen "enter the dragon" and the special you're refering to which includes the portions of the Pagoda movie he was making at the time of his death. I don't care that much about his movies more his messages and role to the martial arts community.
MMA is not a disgrace and posting something like this in the MMA forum was a strange choice. If your point is that with the popularity of MMA has led to the loss of some of the respect and discipline that martial arts have traditionally instilled, then you may be right to some extent. Your post doesn't read that way, though. MMA is a legit sport that maybe you should watch more of before criticizing it. To call MMA in 2007 just kicking each others ass in a cage is ignorant. The amount of training these guys do is incredible and anymore you really have to have a solid game plan. The level of competition has made this more of a thinking man's sport if one wants to reach the top levels and stay there.
05-11-2007, 04:37 PM
You are right about the point I was trying to make. I'm sure its a legit "sport" but I just don't think martial arts should have been taken in that direction. Sanctioned martial arts tournaments are the only place where martial arts trained atheltes should compete. The way they fight in MMA is just not for me. Its like the fans of Monster Truck Rallys are now watching matial arts. Maybe a Monster Truck/WWE/Nascar combination crowd. Its just my opinion don't take it personal. I'm sure they are good fighters but if they want to fight and have my respect they should just do it differently. Its more like boxing or wrestling than like martial arts.
05-11-2007, 04:48 PM
Ok. I see your point. MMA has attracted some of the NASCAR/... crowd for sure. The people who boo when the fight goes to the floor or are only there to see a knockout. UFC marketing attracts this crowd unfortunately.
05-11-2007, 05:15 PM
Ok well now back to Bruce Lee. Have you ever seen his life story movie, where his son played him?. It is a pretty good movie about his life,
05-11-2007, 05:33 PM
That element of fan, the Wrastling Truck types, is necessary for the growth of the sport, one can hope that they graduate beyond the stage of only appreciating knockouts, slams and GNP to appreciate the tactical finessee that distinguishes MMA from kickboxing, fake wrestling and Tuffman contests.
It's a learning curve, some of us are further along, more will join us over time, some will never get it, they're at least good for contributing their $ to build a better sport by those in the know.
Along these lines and Bruce Lee and the variations of Kung Fu, these types and some that should know better fail to appreciate that boxing gloves nullify the precision strikes that these arts are built on for real combat, a boxer may Ko a Kungfu guy in the ring, in a barroom the Jeet Kune Do guy may knifehand the boxer's windpipe.
The evidence on Lee suggests, to me, that based on non movie clips and writings, that he was masterful and dangerous, unfortunately there does'nt appear to be much, if any, ring footage avaliable to assess his skill from, and if there is, hard again to judge his real fighting ability when eyestabs and the like are not permitted.
05-12-2007, 02:10 PM
05-12-2007, 02:19 PM
05-12-2007, 02:33 PM
05-12-2007, 04:19 PM
I find it strange that anyone would think mma hurt martial arts. I think it gives it credibility. It shows what works and what is uselsess. I see no point in learning any fighting style if its not effective. LOL I remeber one dude thought he was bad ass because he took some form of martial arts. Tried to kick a larger dude. The guy walked through the kick so hong kong fue fell down. Obviously he didn't really know how to fight and watched to many movies. He tried to do a fancy back handspring to his feet and caught a kick in the face.lol
05-12-2007, 04:26 PM
05-12-2007, 04:41 PM
05-12-2007, 05:03 PM
I see T-Bone's point and I agree. There is a strong emphasis on these modern MMA matches to please the crowd..which IS necessary, I understand..but it does tend to take away from the calm sanctity and meditative mindset that is supposed to infuse karate and martial arts and replaces it with pure aggression.
The desire to dominate an opponent should technically be confined to the arena of self defense..the last possible option. But ring matches don't really teach that. Yes, they highlight the sport and the art for many to see and that is good, but if many of the fans are there to simply watch a man be beaten..what are they really taking away from that.
I was a wrestler as a kid and gravitated into Harakurao Ju-jitsu for a short period. I would like to get back into it to stay limber, but I don't really have the patience to put up with the sorts of young male aggression I see at many dojos. In this respect, I think Bruce Lee's message and the message of many great masters has been ignored and that's kind of a shame.
But, yeah, I like to see guys mix it up on occassion as well, lol...but I don't mistake that for a real dojo experience.
05-12-2007, 05:08 PM
05-12-2007, 05:10 PM
One of those reasons, the main I think, that people discredit the traditional arts is there are too many schools not doing hard sparring, doing katas plus no real street fighting experience is a recipe for severe trauma if you need it in a combat situation.
One may have aquired fitness and the mental aspects of the arts that way, fighting skill?, don't count on and don't make big claims.
05-12-2007, 05:18 PM
Thats a shame, when I was younger we did Katas, and also we did sparring at the end of class. Everyone would get a chance to spar with everyone elese. After that we would sit down and have 2 people get picked to fight in front of the class with a ref would decide on points. Doing Katas is part of the art, and I don't really think people dicredit traditionalism of martial arts, they are disuaded by MMA and start to equate MMA with traditional martial arts. Street fighting is not really important in self defense. By this I mean most "thugs" on the street don't know how to fight and just carry guns. Let me ask you something...What is the first thing you do when someone pulls a knife on you?
05-12-2007, 05:34 PM
Run, if possible. Fight, preferably, yes, with weapons, if necessary. This is not a hypothetical for me, I've been in that situation.
When you sparred in class, was it padded full contact?
I ask because when, years ago, I looked at Karate classes, they were making the moves short of contact for points, and that is a very bad way to teach the muscle memory of non contact and follow through for proper assesment of your true effect. I should add that hitting is the easy part, taking hits is the seperation.
So I choose Muay Thai, after and still actively boxing.
Agreed there is a large element of Gansta Wannabee types, psuedo toughs with gats, there's also a fair number of street fighters who can punch and wrestle. I'm of the latter, I'm more concerned with offense than defense when the situation warrants.
It's a fight. Maybe if one is trained from birth to be a warrior like the Samurai or Ninja one can maintain calm sanctity and the mediative mindset in one, for the rest of us mere mortals,it's measured predatory rage.
05-12-2007, 06:16 PM
05-12-2007, 06:28 PM
I found a website from my sensi, well my sensi was a local guy, but I did test in front of Master Hidy Ociai, here is his website, and I wanted to copy and paste a quote I found relevent to his teachings, but it won't let me so I will link it,
Hidy Ochiai Foundation - About Hidy Ochiai
05-12-2007, 08:15 PM
I think the confusion here is that T-Bone and Bio are confusing Traditional Martial Arts that have a heavy emphasis on the arts, with MMA, which is more along the lines of boxing and wrestling. There is no emphasis on meditation in boxing and wrestling, other than staying calm for competition. All the traditional arts have basically been eliminated from the repertoires of MMAists. I guess Jiu-Jitsu is traditional, but the dominant form is Brazilian, which is a major sport in Brazil. Other than a few references to staying calm, and loose on the ground instead of grinding your opponent, I haven't heard any of the philosophical side of the arts from the outstanding blackbelt who is my instructor. Muay Thai does have a lot more tradition, but how long have big setting MT bouts been going on in Thailand? MT is also far removed from the millieu of the Shaolin temples.
What other traditional arts are relevant in MMA? I can understand why a traditionalist might not like MMA, but I can't understand why a traditionalist would think that MMA has any bearing on what they do. That would be like a yoga practitioner being upset with a gymnast.
05-12-2007, 08:22 PM
05-13-2007, 01:26 AM
Similar Forum Threads
- By rkc21 in forum PicsReplies: 22Last Post: 08-04-2011, 04:04 PM
- By arnaudkt in forum AnabolicsReplies: 40Last Post: 05-25-2008, 07:05 PM
- By stryder in forum NutraplanetReplies: 13Last Post: 05-25-2006, 04:19 PM
- By Kam in forum Weight LossReplies: 11Last Post: 05-18-2006, 02:46 PM
- By Pax in forum AnabolicsReplies: 31Last Post: 06-03-2005, 10:43 PM