AAS and MMA
- 07-25-2006, 04:48 PM
Originally Posted by jomi822
Listen I'm not tryin to be a jerk here but could someone tell me how a guy who is juicin has the advantage over a non juicin "regular joe" with better fighting skills. Roids ain't gonna keep a guy from gettin knocked the fu*k out.
- 07-25-2006, 04:49 PM
AAS use is rampant in MMA. Even some people you don't think are using... Are using. I'm not just talking about Pride (doesn't even test) of UFC either. In alot of these smaller shows across the country there are plenty of fighters on different anabolics. I don't really see anything wrong with it. Its not really creating an "un-level playing field". Its the intangibles that win you a fight not steroids.
07-25-2006, 04:50 PM
07-25-2006, 04:53 PM
07-25-2006, 05:55 PM
How does that make sense? Why do competitors use steroids if it doesn't give them an advantage? Surely it does. Steroids allow fighters to train harder, longer and recover faster and help in recomp and cutting.Originally Posted by fbxdan
The only reason it wouldn't be be an unlevel playing field is if both competitors who are matched up are both using steroids.
07-25-2006, 06:24 PM
Not all competitors use steroids. Juic'n ain't gonna help u if you are fighting a more skilled opponent. PERIOD. In SOME cases, juicin could be an advantage, but like I've said before.... One has to first FIND an oppertunity.... in order for it to be an advantage. Roids make you stronger, not more skilled.Originally Posted by MarcusG
07-25-2006, 06:32 PM
07-25-2006, 06:39 PM
So when fighting someone more skilled, how is strength gonna stop ya from gettin knocked out?Originally Posted by B4n3 0n3
07-25-2006, 06:49 PM
Simple, grab the guy and put him in a hold. I have gone against better wrestlers than me and if your are strong enough you can go into a defensive style and hold the guy down.Originally Posted by NO HYPE
07-25-2006, 06:57 PM
How is grabbing a guy and putting him in a hold, simple if the other fighter is more skilled? Don't u actually have to catch the guy first?Originally Posted by B4n3 0n3
07-25-2006, 07:12 PM
Sure you gotta catch him but believe me strength helps alot. If strength had nothing to do with fighting then how come the fighters are muscular? Why aren't they a bunch of skinny dudes that look like marathon runners then? I understand where you are comming from to a certain extent but you gotta face reality here that strength plays a huge role in fighting.Originally Posted by NO HYPE
07-25-2006, 07:25 PM
Of course you need both skill and strength. If you are totally lacking in one or the other, then you are ****ed. The pros are not particularly lacking in either one. Steroid is just that extra edge to win.
07-25-2006, 07:43 PM
I didn't say that strength had nothing to do with fighting. I was comparing srength to skill.Originally Posted by B4n3 0n3
Now I'm not sayin that I can't lose a fight here cuz nobody is that talented and strength can be a definite advantage if first given the oppertunity, but I am an MMA fighter, so I HAVE faced reality. And reality is.... IF.... the other guy can't put me in a hold or can't connect because my skill level is better than his, than he's either gonna be bleed'n profusley about the mouth, or he's gonna be unconscious. Roids or not!
07-25-2006, 08:04 PM
Originally Posted by NO HYPE
The issue is not whether competitors use steroids.
Opportunity?? Steroids ARE ALWAYS GOING TO HELP either way whether a competitor is skilled or not. How is being able to train harder and longer and cut more fat not helping? Extra strength is always an advantage whether someone is in a bad or good position.
Thinking about it I remember you made the odd comment that cutting weight doesn't help much which is bizzare. Cutting weight in boxing/wrestling especially in the lower weight classes is a HUGE advantage. Rich Franklin who walks at 210-215 off-season cuts all the way down to 185.
The plain and simple fact is that competitors aren't going to risk testing positive for steroids if it isn't going to help them. Size and strength is a big advantage unless someone is simply totally crap and has lousy skills.
07-25-2006, 08:16 PM
There's so many people that think strength is sooo important. They get over here to Bangkok, at a bar, see a fight, offer to get in the ring with a 130lb Thai, and despite their decade of training in the states, get their ass handed to them. It's great fun to watch
07-25-2006, 08:18 PM
07-25-2006, 08:42 PM
No. The issue here is not wether or not competitors use steroids. The words "Why do you think competitors use steroids" came from your post, not mine. I simply responded.Originally Posted by MarcusG
No. The issue here is not wether steroids are gonna help someone phisically or not. That fact is pretty friggin obvious. The point that was made was that strength or size is not the determining factor in a fight. I ask you. If strength is ALWAYS an advantage in a fight, than how do u justify it being an advantage when the stronger guy is layin on the mat, knocked the fu*k out?
07-25-2006, 08:47 PM
Well put.Originally Posted by Rogue Drone
Damn. You seem to be doin pretty good on the rep points bro.
By the way, what camp did you say you come out of?
07-25-2006, 08:53 PM
Marcus is clearly saying that with all else being equal, the stronger man has an advantage. He never implied that strength was everything.Originally Posted by NO HYPE
07-25-2006, 09:07 PM
All else ain't equal. If all fighters were equal in skill, than there would be no winners. No reason for fighting. The stronger man must first FIND an oppertunity for it to be an advantage.Originally Posted by Alexander
And no he didn't imply that strength was everything, he just implied that strength is ALWAYS an advantage and that is bullsh*t.
07-25-2006, 09:11 PM
Then how do you explain when the more skilled opponent is laying on the mat knocked the **** out?
07-25-2006, 09:19 PM
Well if steroids are rampant in professional sports including prizefighting, then my general statement is correct unless you disagree.Originally Posted by NO HYPE
Your example is flawed since you can't always assume that the guy who knocked him out wasn't on steroids in the first place.
Bullsh!t? A crappy fighter like Kimo would benefit from anabolic steroids, someone as skilled as Fedor would also benefit from steroids since strength is a primary attribute. Strength, stamina, speed and having a good chin are all primary attributes. To say strength is not a factor doesn't make sense.
And you haven't responded why training harder, longer, having less fat and having an easier time cutting while on steroids isn't an advantage.
07-25-2006, 09:23 PM
Originally Posted by B4n3 0n3
Just how did ya come to the conclusion that the guy who gets knocked uncoscious, is the more skilled opponent?
07-25-2006, 09:30 PM
Well lets say that everybody said so and so was a great skilled fighter with much greater skills than his opponent. And then he loses when he was supposedly the more skilled man. It's just as hypothetical as your scenario really.Originally Posted by NO HYPE
07-25-2006, 10:08 PM
Originally Posted by Rogue Drone
Team Dagger? the one with kendal from Hawaii? If so Howzit brah. I had my first pro fight out of hawaii in Warriors Quest. I'm coming out of FSA now in SSF we are under Cesar.
Back to AAS i think it's going to be alot let prevalent now due to the fact kimo got popped and he wasnt' even in a championship fight. NSAC was only testing those involved in Title fights but looks like CSAC is testing whoever it feels like
Similar Forum Threads
- By Alpine in forum AnabolicsReplies: 8Last Post: 06-29-2004, 12:25 AM
- By TheTom in forum AnabolicsReplies: 6Last Post: 03-15-2004, 02:00 AM
- By Musclemar in forum AnabolicsReplies: 0Last Post: 07-18-2003, 02:28 PM
- By lwb357 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 1Last Post: 02-26-2003, 06:27 AM
- By ironviking in forum Cycle InfoReplies: 13Last Post: 02-03-2003, 05:55 PM