Pros and Cons of Sub-Q T

  1. Advanced Member
    rick055's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    374
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    32.57%

    Pros and Cons of Sub-Q T


    How many here are doing their injects sub-q?

    Have you experienced any benefit over IM?

    What is the rationale behind it?

  2. Advanced Member
    rick055's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    374
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    32.57%

    Just Found this on another board:
    ---------------------------------------
    ---------------------------------------

    Saudi Med J. 2006 Dec;27(12):1843-6.

    Subcutaneous administration of testosterone. A pilot study report.Al-Futaisi AM, Al-Zakwani IS, Almahrezi AM, Morris D.
    Department of Medicine, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, PO Box 35, Postal Code 123, Al-Khod, Sultanate of Oman. Tel. +968 99475401. Tel/Fax. +968 24413419. E-mail: alfutaisi@squ.edu.om.

    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of low doses of subcutaneous testosterone in hypogonadal men since the intramuscular route, which is the most widely used form of testosterone replacement therapy, is inconvenient to many patients. METHODS: All men with primary and secondary hypogonadism attending the reproductive endocrine clinic at Royal Victoria Hospital, Monteral, Quebec, Canada, were invited to participate in the study. Subjects were enrolled from January 2002 till December 2002. Patients were asked to self-administer weekly low doses of testosterone enanthate using 0.5 ml insulin syringe. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean trough was 14.48 +/- 3.14 nmol/L and peak total testosterone was 21.65 +/- 7.32 nmol/L. For the free testosterone the average trough was 59.94 +/- 20.60 pmol/L and the peak was 85.17 +/- 32.88 pmol/L. All of the patients delivered testosterone with ease and no local reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: Therapy with weekly subcutaneous testosterone produced serum levels that were within the normal range in 100% of patients for both peak and trough levels. This is the first report, which demonstrated the efficacy of delivering weekly testosterone using this cheap, safe, and less painful subcutaneous route.PMID: 17143361 [PubMed - in process]
  3. New Member
    MarkLA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    209
    Rep Power
    194
    Level
    12
    Lv. Percent
    24.08%

    Quote Originally Posted by rick055 View Post
    How many here are doing their injects sub-q?

    Have you experienced any benefit over IM?

    What is the rationale behind it?
    I think the Pro is that it's less painful since you're not going into a muscle.
    •   
       

  4. Professional Member
    JanSz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    2417
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    61.65%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkLA View Post
    I think the Pro is that it's less painful since you're not going into a muscle.
    I use subQ T shots.
    At first I used 31ga 5/16" long needle (it is smallest and shortest that I could find).
    I found out tiny leakouts from time to time, nothing really big, most likely acceptable situation.
    I use now 30ga 1/2" long needle.
    They do not make 31ga 1/2" long.

    I never tried IM test shots but am hearing that they are painfull.
    There is absolutely no pain when doing SubQ shots, no leak outs (now with longer needle).

    I started my T shots on 6/19/07, using accelerated schedule (to get to steady levels faster).
    Blood draw 8/30/07
    results and dose adjustments shown on my post #62
    Jan's BloodTest April13/2007

    I use SubQ shots because of pain considerations,
    but I thing that there is additional benefit as I expect that testosterone
    fat--->blood transfer is slower than
    muscles--->blood transfer.
  5. Advanced Member
    rick055's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    374
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    32.57%

    Is it an "accepted" delivery method? (not the regular medical community, the anti-aging community)?
  6. Professional Member
    JanSz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    2417
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    61.65%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by rick055 View Post
    Is it an "accepted" delivery method? (not the regular medical community, the anti-aging community)?
    I think dr John argued aginst subQ shots.
    I do them any way,
    and have blood test that show they are working.
    I try to avoid pain if I can help it.
  7. Registered User
    hardasnails1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,039
    Rep Power
    1163
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    84.32%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by JanSz View Post
    I think dr John argued aginst subQ shots.
    I do them any way,
    and have blood test that show they are working.
    I try to avoid pain if I can help it.
    Dr j infered that 1/2 inch is not sub Q but IM ..
    I use my shoulders and quads..
  8. Professional Member
    JanSz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    2417
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    61.65%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by hardasnails1973 View Post
    Dr j infered that 1/2 inch is not sub Q but IM ..
    I use my shoulders and quads..
    I make sure that my shots are subQ.
    I pinch the skin on my belly and insert the needle 45 deg sideways.
    No questions, my shots are SubQ shots, needle does not touch the muscle.

    Sometimes I am curious how it would feel if I went 90 deg inti tihg musscle, but no thanks for the pain.

    Soon I will go to get flu shots.
    My doc does it with (probably) with 30ga 1/2" long needle to deltoid muscle straight 90 deg, not a big deal either but why bother.
  9. New Member
    anyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    399
    Rep Power
    293
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    49.43%

    Most importantly, how do you FEEL on sub q shots?


    How do you feel? Notice any difference between the 2 methods?

    Quote Originally Posted by JanSz View Post
    I make sure that my shots are subQ.
    I pinch the skin on my belly and insert the needle 45 deg sideways.
    No questions, my shots are SubQ shots, needle does not touch the muscle.

    Sometimes I am curious how it would feel if I went 90 deg inti tihg musscle, but no thanks for the pain.

    Soon I will go to get flu shots.
    My doc does it with (probably) with 30ga 1/2" long needle to deltoid muscle straight 90 deg, not a big deal either but why bother.
  10. New Member
    anyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    399
    Rep Power
    293
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    49.43%

    Dr J may not like sub q, but Dr. Shippen does.


    Quote Originally Posted by JanSz View Post
    I think dr John argued aginst subQ shots.
    I do them any way,
    and have blood test that show they are working.
    I try to avoid pain if I can help it.
    I trust Dr S and will go the sub q route when I ever so reluctantly start my routine. Would have started today, but there was no mail delivery today due to Columbus day. Seems stupid-the whole world works except the privileged few.
  11. Professional Member
    JanSz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    2417
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    61.65%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by anyman View Post
    I trust Dr S and will go the sub q route when I ever so reluctantly start my routine. Would have started today, but there was no mail delivery today due to Columbus day. Seems stupid-the whole world works except the privileged few.
    I just hope that when you start,
    you are going to do that full bore,
    instead of wasting more time.


    I am so glad that I am priviledged, I do not work.
    I tried to work but was newer succesfull at it, so I quit.
    What a country, beautifull USA.

    Between my son, daughter and son-in-law,
    son and daugher worked
    son-in-law had a free day, but he took my grandson to see his parents in Reading PA,
    so wife had a day off too.
  12. New Member
    anyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    399
    Rep Power
    293
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    49.43%

    Just because I apparently need T cyp doesn't mean I have to like it.


    Quote Originally Posted by JanSz View Post
    I just hope that when you start,
    you are going to do that full bore,
    instead of wasting more time.
    I will be starting .6ml of 100mg T cyp (hope I have the terms right) and reducing my hcg to 300iu 2x/week as soon as the T is here. The first bottle should have been delivered today, but there is no mail today.

    Taking external T is akin to admitting defeat- I was unable to successfully ID the source of the problem and repair it. Now I'll be dependent on external meds, the supply of which can be cut off through no fault of my own (Remember Hurricane Katrina?). At the age of 44 I am saddened to be dependent on medicine at so young an age, but my options are, regrettably, few and far between. I resent my body's failure and inability to conduct basic repairs. We really are a poorly designed species, aren't we?
  13. Professional Member
    JanSz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    2417
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    61.65%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by anyman View Post
    I will be starting .6ml of 100mg T cyp (hope I have the terms right) and reducing my hcg to 300iu 2x/week as soon as the T is here. The first bottle should have been delivered today, but there is no mail today.

    Taking external T is akin to admitting defeat- I was unable to successfully ID the source of the problem and repair it. Now I'll be dependent on external meds, the supply of which can be cut off through no fault of my own (Remember Hurricane Katrina?). At the age of 44 I am saddened to be dependent on medicine at so young an age, but my options are, regrettably, few and far between. I resent my body's failure and inability to conduct basic repairs. We really are a poorly designed species, aren't we?
    Make sure that you take you (averege) weekly dose using E3D schedule.
    What is your SHBG?
    My last known SHBG=26
    my new dose =38units=177.3mg/week
    post #62
    Jan's BloodTest April13/2007

    Your goal is
    FreeT=300
    ============================== ==

    You say: "I will be starting .6ml of 100mg T cyp"
    The higher the SHBG the more T you need.
    Make sure that you use 200mg/ml Depo-testosterone.
    But if you are forced to use the 100mg/mL kind, remember to double the volume.
    ============================== ==



    The sooner you give up on "admitting defeat" the better for you.
    Just be gratefull that you have way out.

    Use it.
    .
    .
  14. New Member
    anyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    399
    Rep Power
    293
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    49.43%

    I am starting at a lower dose at Dr S's directive. He wants to start low and work up.


    Quote Originally Posted by JanSz View Post
    Make sure that you take you (averege) weekly dose using E3D schedule.
    What is your SHBG?
    My last known SHBG=26
    my new dose =38units=177.3mg/week
    post #62
    Jan's BloodTest April13/2007

    Your goal is
    FreeT=300
    ============================== ==

    You say: "I will be starting .6ml of 100mg T cyp"
    The higher the SHBG the more T you need.
    Make sure that you use 200mg/ml Depo-testosterone.
    But if you are forced to use the 100mg/mL kind, remember to double the volume.
    ============================== ==

    My SHBG is quite low--around 12. Dr S wants me to start lower and work up as--and if-- needed. He is trying to keep as much of my testes working as is possible. We'll start at 6ml and work up after a 3 week blood test. He is of the opinion that my very low shbg allows for lower total and free levels. We'll see how it goes. Maybe I'll get lucky and start to feel a bit better. The weird part is that usually feel pretty good the later it gets. I am really irritable and even depressed in the earlyt morning, but get better as the day wears into evening.
  15. New Member
    ECTOmorph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    378
    Rep Power
    297
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    53.41%

    I think Dr John doesnt reccomend it based on little reseach done about its effects and the fact that it is not common, and he doesnt want to push the envelope in the community
  16. New Member
    CF10's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Age
    30
    Posts
    160
    Rep Power
    173
    Level
    11
    Lv. Percent
    25%

    I wondered what to expect as far as pain goes as well, but through my first 3 IM shots I have felt absolutely no pain. The only "pain" I feel is when the needle initially breaks the skin. It doesnt hurt at all when going into the muscle and there is no soreness the next day for me.

    By the way I'm using 25g, 1 inch needles into the quads.
  17. New Member
    ECTOmorph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    378
    Rep Power
    297
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    53.41%

    Quote Originally Posted by CF10 View Post
    I wondered what to expect as far as pain goes as well, but through my first 3 IM shots I have felt absolutely no pain. The only "pain" I feel is when the needle initially breaks the skin. It doesnt hurt at all when going into the muscle and there is no soreness the next day for me.

    By the way I'm using 25g, 1 inch needles into the quads.
    Agreed after my first 2 shots I havnt noticed pain since
  18. Professional Member
    JanSz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    2417
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    61.65%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by anyman View Post
    My SHBG is quite low--around 12. Dr S wants me to start lower and work up as--and if-- needed. He is trying to keep as much of my testes working as is possible. We'll start at 6ml and work up after a 3 week blood test. He is of the opinion that my very low shbg allows for lower total and free levels. We'll see how it goes. Maybe I'll get lucky and start to feel a bit better. The weird part is that usually feel pretty good the later it gets. I am really irritable and even depressed in the earlyt morning, but get better as the day wears into evening.
    To get FreeT~250-300
    With SHBG=12
    you need
    TotalT= 750-900

    To get that TT you need
    100-125 mg/week testosterone, best on E3D schedule.
    That 0.6mL testosterone may do the job if you use
    200mg/mL strenght.

    Since your SHBG is real low, you may be better off using E2D schedule, every other day.

    Assuming that you are going to be using 200mg/mL testosterone
    you weekly dose =120mg/week
    assuming E2D schedule,
    each shot=0.6/7*2=0.17cc=17 units on syringe
    at the same time do shots of hcg Novarel 250iu
    consider your estrodial status

    To arrive sooner at your average level of blood testosterone
    first four days do T shots each day and then continue on E2D schedule.

    Bottom line is blood test, T, E2 and DHT
    do these tests at Quest, draw blood on day of the shot, time of the shot, before shot.

    Estradiol, Free, LC/MS/MS (36169X)
    Testosterone, Free, Bio/Total (LC/MS/MS)
    Dihydrotestosterone, Free, Serum (36168X)

    there is many many other tests that you should consider.
    see my post #62
    Jan's BloodTest April13/2007
    I am describing my Test and Liquidex dose adjusment based on above tests.

    Looking at my chart, E2D schedule,
    you should be rather well stabilized at 3 weeks after change of schedule.
    Possibly there is no need to wait the usual 6 weeks.

    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/404im...eek-tcypionate

    Post #23 of
    Jan's BloodTest April13/2007

    Do not eat anything that is known to lower SHBG.
    Estrogen Metabolism
    To raise SHBG drink soy milk.
  19. Registered User
    hardasnails1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,039
    Rep Power
    1163
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    84.32%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by anyman View Post
    My SHBG is quite low--around 12. Dr S wants me to start lower and work up as--and if-- needed. He is trying to keep as much of my testes working as is possible. We'll start at 6ml and work up after a 3 week blood test. He is of the opinion that my very low shbg allows for lower total and free levels. We'll see how it goes. Maybe I'll get lucky and start to feel a bit better. The weird part is that usually feel pretty good the later it gets. I am really irritable and even depressed in the earlyt morning, but get better as the day wears into evening.

    Increase fiber intake to 35-40 grams majoirty of 70% soluable SHBG will come up and lower fat intake a bit. Go on a vegan type diet shbg will rise..
    shbg is mainly driven by insulin and as i stated before insulin is a big factor...it makes sense more fiber reduces amount of insulin needed to handle the glucose. Less fiber speeds it up. am putting this theory to the test and my next blood report will reflect it.. shbg and insulin are antagonists. unless there is receptor damage give this a try and if it does not work then metformin may be necessary.
  20. Advanced Member
    rick055's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    374
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    32.57%

    Quote Originally Posted by CF10 View Post
    By the way I'm using 25g, 1 inch needles into the quads.
    Okay, so if one decides to go the IM route, you can inject solely in the quad? You can ignore the glutes?

    My worry is not about the injection; they don't bother me.

    But the glute shot seems kind of tricky to do by yourself.

    Any opinions?
  21. New Member
    CF10's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Age
    30
    Posts
    160
    Rep Power
    173
    Level
    11
    Lv. Percent
    25%

    Quote Originally Posted by rick055 View Post
    Okay, so if one decides to go the IM route, you can inject solely in the quad? You can ignore the glutes?

    My worry is not about the injection; they don't bother me.

    But the glute shot seems kind of tricky to do by yourself.

    Any opinions?
    I plan on rotating the glutes in there as soon as I get some larger needles. If it is too difficult I will just do quads only.
  22. New Member
    ECTOmorph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    378
    Rep Power
    297
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    53.41%

    Quote Originally Posted by rick055 View Post
    Okay, so if one decides to go the IM route, you can inject solely in the quad? You can ignore the glutes?

    My worry is not about the injection; they don't bother me.

    But the glute shot seems kind of tricky to do by yourself.

    Any opinions?
    I only do quads, its the only place I can see myself actually doing.
  23. Senior Member
    Hyde12's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,920
    Rep Power
    1059
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    53.17%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by JanSz View Post
    To get FreeT~250-300
    With SHBG=12
    you need
    TotalT= 750-900

    To get that TT you need
    100-125 mg/week testosterone, best on E3D schedule.
    That 0.6mL testosterone may do the job if you use
    200mg/mL strenght.

    Since your SHBG is real low, you may be better off using E2D schedule, every other day.

    Assuming that you are going to be using 200mg/mL testosterone
    you weekly dose =120mg/week
    assuming E2D schedule,
    each shot=0.6/7*2=0.17cc=17 units on syringe
    at the same time do shots of hcg Novarel 250iu
    consider your estrodial status

    To arrive sooner at your average level of blood testosterone
    first four days do T shots each day and then continue on E2D schedule.

    Bottom line is blood test, T, E2 and DHT
    do these tests at Quest, draw blood on day of the shot, time of the shot, before shot.

    Estradiol, Free, LC/MS/MS (36169X)
    Testosterone, Free, Bio/Total (LC/MS/MS)
    Dihydrotestosterone, Free, Serum (36168X)

    there is many many other tests that you should consider.
    see my post #62
    Jan's BloodTest April13/2007
    I am describing my Test and Liquidex dose adjusment based on above tests.

    Looking at my chart, E2D schedule,
    you should be rather well stabilized at 3 weeks after change of schedule.
    Possibly there is no need to wait the usual 6 weeks.

    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/404im...eek-tcypionate

    Post #23 of
    Jan's BloodTest April13/2007

    Do not eat anything that is known to lower SHBG.
    Estrogen Metabolism
    To raise SHBG drink soy milk.
    JanSz, you post on here a lot with a lot of useful info, but you never say how YOU are feeling with your TRT. So, I am curious, how is the routine you are on working for you?
  24. Professional Member
    JanSz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    2417
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    61.65%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Hyde12 View Post
    JanSz, you post on here a lot with a lot of useful info, but you never say how YOU are feeling with your TRT. So, I am curious, how is the routine you are on working for you?
    I am satisfied by my mostly self treating method.
    It is working for me very well.
    I have been left for dead by head of sex department in major hospital in Manhattan NYC, at least the sex part.
    I described my story many times on this board.
    What I am advising to others is what I do for myself.

    I am looking for all kind of angles of good health so I am reluctant to call what I do TRT or HRT,
    anti-aging would be more like it..

    See my story/diary/research here:
    Jan's BloodTest April13/2007

    .
  25. New Member
    ECTOmorph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    378
    Rep Power
    297
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    53.41%

    Quote Originally Posted by TJack View Post
    I recall reading in a number of places on another forum where he used to be at (not sure he ever addressed this topic over there), but he did specify one concern. And that concern dealt with a belief on his part that injecting T subQ would lead to an increase of Total Es and E2 as the aromatase factor is much more heavily present in fat cells than in muscle cells... and that therefore one could have a strong potential for excessive aromatizing of T into E if using subQ injections.

    So... the study quoted above is great - except it does NOT address what happens with estrogen levels when the groups used IM injections versus subQ injections. I believe in a couple posts there that he pointed out that transdermal users usually have higher E levels as they are transferring the exogenous T directly into the dermal / fat layers below the skin and he believed that was due to the T in the fat cells converting more efficiently via aromatase into E...

    For subQ users, have you ever specifically charted E levels (specific blood test results) from when you did T via IM injections versus doing it as subQ injections.

    I currently inject IM (strictly quads - I draw with a 22-gauge 1 1/2" needle and then switch over to a 27 ga. 1 1/4" needle to inject - and only insert needle about 1"... I also find if I ice pack the injection area while I am setting everything up that when I go to actually inject it is totally painless).

    SubQ injections could be slightly more convenient (I could drop the icing procedure - plus I already inject HcG subQ), but I do have lingering worries over estrogen increases due to aromatase via fat cells where you are injecting directly into.

    Also for subQ users, do you draw from the vial directly with the subQ syringe & needle? And if so, doesn't that take quite a while with the thicker fluid of the T (as compared to HcG)? Or do you use another regular syringe to draw with and inject the T into the insulin type syringe?
    i know one person showed labs after switching to subq and his e2 stayed the same

    thats one person tho
  26. Advanced Member
    rick055's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    374
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    32.57%

    Quote Originally Posted by TJack View Post

    I believe in a couple posts there that he pointed out that transdermal users usually have higher E levels as they are transferring the exogenous T directly into the dermal / fat layers below the skin and he believed that was due to the T in the fat cells converting more efficiently via aromatase into E...
    I believe transdermals have a higher propensity to metabolize into DHT (not E2) because of the interaction with 5 alpha reductase in the skin, but the logic would be the same.

    If you are injecting into where there's a lot of aromatase activity, maybe the expectation would be increased E2.

    I wonder if those posts were about people applying the transdermals to their abdomens; I understand that we don't usually apply to areas where there is fat because of that concern.
  27. New Member
    TJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    23
    Rep Power
    113
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    60.66%

    Question


    Quote Originally Posted by rick055 View Post
    I believe transdermals have a higher propensity to metabolize into DHT (not E2) because of the interaction with 5 alpha reductase in the skin, but the logic would be the same.

    If you are injecting into where there's a lot of aromatase activity, maybe the expectation would be increased E2.

    I wonder if those posts were about people applying the transdermals to their abdomens; I understand that we don't usually apply to areas where there is fat because of that concern.


    No, the threasd involved (and it was on more than one occasion - at MESO, I believe) was specifically about doing Test via subQ injection.

    And Dr. Crisler was very much set against it... and specifically for the reason of that aromatase activity being higher in the fat cells and that when you do Test via subQ that you are injecting into the fat cells - thereby causing (or at least creating a higher potential to cause) higher Total Es and higher E2.

    The threads were NOT about transdermals, just in the one thread Dr. Crisler used transdermals as at example as how you are in effect (if you have fatty application areas) inserting the Test into the fat layers where aromatase factor can be of greater impact...

    I believe in the one post he said something along the effect of " ... so we don't inject Testosterone subQ as you're putting it into fat cells and that is where aromatase factor lives... " (or something to that effect.

    I am not saying that this is what I believe 100% one way or the other - and still am waiting on some conclusive evidence in that regards. Just pointing out what I definitely recall from more than one posting of Dr. Crisler's.

    :clean:
  28. New Member
    anyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    399
    Rep Power
    293
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    49.43%

    Then why would other Dr's equally regarded, like Dr Shippen, support sub-q?


    Quote Originally Posted by TJack View Post
    And Dr. Crisler was very much set against it... and specifically for the reason of that aromatase activity being higher in the fat cells and that when you do Test via subQ that you are injecting into the fat cells - thereby causing (or at least creating a higher potential to cause) higher Total Es and higher E2.


    I believe in the one post he said something along the effect of " ... so we don't inject Testosterone subQ as you're putting it into fat cells and that is where aromatase factor lives... " or something to that effect.

    I too have heard of his opposition to sub q. But, Dr Shippen favors it. Why? What are the arguments on the other side of the fence?
  29. Advanced Member
    rick055's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    374
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    32.57%

    Quote Originally Posted by TJack View Post
    No, the threasd involved (and it was on more than one occasion - at MESO, I believe) was specifically about doing Test via subQ injection.

    And Dr. Crisler was very much set against it... and specifically for the reason of that aromatase activity being higher in the fat cells and that when you do Test via subQ that you are injecting into the fat cells - thereby causing (or at least creating a higher potential to cause) higher Total Es and higher E2.

    The threads were NOT about transdermals, just in the one thread Dr. Crisler used transdermals as at example as how you are in effect (if you have fatty application areas) inserting the Test into the fat layers where aromatase factor can be of greater impact...

    I believe in the one post he said something along the effect of " ... so we don't inject Testosterone subQ as you're putting it into fat cells and that is where aromatase factor lives... " (or something to that effect.

    I am not saying that this is what I believe 100% one way or the other - and still am waiting on some conclusive evidence in that regards. Just pointing out what I definitely recall from more than one posting of Dr. Crisler's.

    :clean:
    Interesting stuff, indeed. I hope someone does more studies.
  30. New Member
    TJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    23
    Rep Power
    113
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    60.66%

    Quote Originally Posted by anyman View Post
    I too have heard of his opposition to sub q. But, Dr Shippen favors it. Why? What are the arguments on the other side of the fence?

    There is THE $64,000.00 question.

    What are the arguments on the other side of the fence?

    What I have heard mainly is that subQ shots are easier to do - true, except I don't know about drawing from a vial with that thin of a needle - if that is what they do with subQ... and less "painful" (though the way that I do them with quads they are almost 100% painfree) - but true basically, and almost never have bleeding - true, etc.

    Those are all nice advantages - plus the advantages of using same set-up of syringes rather than mutiple types. But if this process has anything more than a very remote chance of increasing E2 abd Total Es, then I personally would tend to shy away from it.

    I believe (but not fully sure on this as I am trying to recall a quote from a Shippen patient - or so he claimed), but something was stated in the post I am vaguely recalling to the effect that Shippen was primarily concerned that E2 and Total E levels were simply "in range", not that they necessarily be in an "optimal range" as Dr. Crisler desires (at least at one time).

    So maybe that accounts for the difference between Dr. Crisler's viewpoint and Dr. Shippen's viewpoint.

    Also, is there anyone on this forum who very specifically a patient of Dr. Shippen's and is on Test via subQ specifically per Dr. Shippen? I have heard lots of comments about how Dr. Shipen not only thinks subQ is "okay", but that it is "better"... yet when I try tracking it down it turns out that the poster "knew of someone" or had "heard about one of Shippen's patients" or etc., etc., etc.

    Unfiortunatley Dr. Shippen is not open with his viewpoints to the extent that Dr. Crisler is. In fact, as far as I know he doesn't even have a web site! Nor publish openly (articles, online commentaries, etc.) what protocols he is using, looking into, etc., etc.

    Yes, he did write a book (which many consider "THE Bible" for TRT / Male HRT)... but the fact is that the book was initially written in 1998, with the most recent printing being in 2001 - with basically NO new information in the later printing. So we are talking about data that is 9 - 10 years old (and older).

    So people going by that protocol and those regimens are following protocols that dated from the mid 90s to late 90s (seeing as how it takes at least a few months to write a book). And in addition to that, Dr. Shippen himself has since changed these protocols dramatically (from what one hears) and even reversed his position on some areas.
  31. Advanced Member
    rick055's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    374
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    32.57%

    Quote Originally Posted by hardasnails1973 View Post
    Easy route
    28 gusge 1/2 inch in shoulder or leg. Dr j said it is IM not subcutaneous END OF STORY
    Where exactly do you inject the quad?
  32. Registered User
    hardasnails1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,039
    Rep Power
    1163
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    84.32%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by rick055 View Post
    Where exactly do you inject the quad?
    outer meat of the muscle at 45 degree angle..Shoulders are so much easier !!
  33. Advanced Member
    rick055's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    567
    Rep Power
    374
    Level
    19
    Lv. Percent
    32.57%

    Quote Originally Posted by hardasnails1973 View Post
    outer meat of the muscle at 45 degree angle..Shoulders are so much easier !!
    Do you get the same effect in the shoulder?

    Do you need (at least) the quads if not also the glutes to rotate injeciton sites?

    Or are two delts enough?
  34. New Member
    cpeil2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    414
    Rep Power
    305
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    21.02%

    Quote Originally Posted by hardasnails1973 View Post
    Easy route
    28 gusge 1/2 inch in shoulder or leg. Dr j said it is IM not subcutaneous END OF STORY

    I would think so. 1/2 inch on a leg or a shoulder is a pretty thick subcutaneous fat layer.
  35. New Member
    anyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    399
    Rep Power
    293
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    49.43%

    Well, I am a patient of Dr S. I'll have to ask him why he favors sub q vs im (m)


    Quote Originally Posted by TJack View Post
    There is THE $64,000.00 question.
    Also, is there anyone on this forum who very specifically a patient of Dr. Shippen's and is on Test via subQ specifically per Dr. Shippen? I have heard lots of comments about how Dr. Shipen not only thinks subQ is "okay", but that it is "better"... yet when I try tracking it down it turns out that the poster "knew of someone" or had "heard about one of Shippen's patients" or etc., etc., etc.

    Unfiortunatley Dr. Shippen is not open with his viewpoints to the extent that Dr. Crisler is. In fact, as far as I know he doesn't even have a web site! Nor publish openly (articles, online commentaries, etc.) what protocols he is using, looking into, etc., etc.
    I am supposed to spk to him late next month. I'll see what he says. I do know that my specific instructions were sub q. For now, at least, and 1 1/2 weeks into T cyp, I feel no better. Still fatigued, tired, mildly depressed and irritated. The weird part is, it is always worse in the morning and gets better as the day wears into the evening. By 9-10 pm I feel pretty good! Wish I could make sense of this.
  36. New Member
    ECTOmorph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    378
    Rep Power
    297
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    53.41%

    Quote Originally Posted by anyman View Post
    I am supposed to spk to him late next month. I'll see what he says. I do know that my specific instructions were sub q. For now, at least, and 1 1/2 weeks into T cyp, I feel no better. Still fatigued, tired, mildly depressed and irritated. The weird part is, it is always worse in the morning and gets better as the day wears into the evening. By 9-10 pm I feel pretty good! Wish I could make sense of this.
    whats your dose?

    def give it a month to kick in
  37. New Member
    anyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    399
    Rep Power
    293
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    49.43%

    I am taking .6ml of 100mg T cyp 1x/week and 300iu hcg 2x/week (m)


    Quote Originally Posted by ECTOmorph View Post
    whats your dose?

    def give it a month to kick in
    Intellectually I know this could take some time to kick in. Emotionally, I am tired of feeling, well, tired. What a stupid and pointless affliction. We really are a rather poorly designed species, aren't we?
  38. Registered User
    hardasnails1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,039
    Rep Power
    1163
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    84.32%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by anyman View Post
    Intellectually I know this could take some time to kick in. Emotionally, I am tired of feeling, well, tired. What a stupid and pointless affliction. We really are a rather poorly designed species, aren't we?
    If your shbg is low muiltiple injection will help raise it as it did mine and addin more fiber less fat to your diet diet more like 40 grams a day your shbg will go up. This is common fact..
  39. New Member
    T800's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Age
    40
    Posts
    152
    Rep Power
    169
    Level
    11
    Lv. Percent
    16.82%

    I believe Dr Crisler's main objection to sub-q was the fact that he felt that injecting oil into fatty tissue produces unknown long-term consequences to that tissue.

    Many lab results (including my own) have shown that sub-q delivers Test in a slower and steadier fashion. Many guys (including myself) note that E2 is lower on sub-q.

    I think sub-q dulls the sharp spike in Test levels seen with IM injections. As a result, the response by E2 and DHT is less pronounced.

    Sonny
  40. New Member
    TJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    23
    Rep Power
    113
    Level
    4
    Lv. Percent
    60.66%

    Quote Originally Posted by rick055 View Post
    Just Found this on another board:
    ---------------------------------------
    ---------------------------------------

    Saudi Med J. 2006 Dec;27(12):1843-6.

    Subcutaneous administration of testosterone. A pilot study report.Al-Futaisi AM, Al-Zakwani IS, Almahrezi AM, Morris D.
    Department of Medicine, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, PO Box 35, Postal Code 123, Al-Khod, Sultanate of Oman. Tel. +968 99475401. Tel/Fax. +968 24413419. E-mail: alfutaisi@squ.edu.om.

    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of low doses of subcutaneous testosterone in hypogonadal men since the intramuscular route, which is the most widely used form of testosterone replacement therapy, is inconvenient to many patients. METHODS: All men with primary and secondary hypogonadism attending the reproductive endocrine clinic at Royal Victoria Hospital, Monteral, Quebec, Canada, were invited to participate in the study. Subjects were enrolled from January 2002 till December 2002. Patients were asked to self-administer weekly low doses of testosterone enanthate using 0.5 ml insulin syringe. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean trough was 14.48 +/- 3.14 nmol/L and peak total testosterone was 21.65 +/- 7.32 nmol/L. For the free testosterone the average trough was 59.94 +/- 20.60 pmol/L and the peak was 85.17 +/- 32.88 pmol/L. All of the patients delivered testosterone with ease and no local reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: Therapy with weekly subcutaneous testosterone produced serum levels that were within the normal range in 100% of patients for both peak and trough levels. This is the first report, which demonstrated the efficacy of delivering weekly testosterone using this cheap, safe, and less painful subcutaneous route.PMID: 17143361 [PubMed - in process]



    Arrrggghhh....

    Why didn't these fools ALSO test for Total Estrogens, Estradiol, and DHT to see if any of those were affected by injecting subQ???

    I have also heard about Dr John's feeling on subQ injections and read posts he has filed concerning his opposition to them. I have also heard that Dr Shippen will closely monitor subQ injection patients to see if estrogen levels rise noticeably and that if they do he switches them to IM injections before looking at any "estrogen control" regimens like AIs. Heard that often switching them over to IM injections will cure up moderate rises in Es due to subQ injections.

    This study "could" have answered that right off the bat!

  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-02-2009, 11:25 AM
  2. The Pros and Cons of LEUKIC A Review
    By David Dunn in forum Supplements
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-27-2009, 07:25 PM
  3. pros and cons of a high protien low carb diet yearound
    By keater824 in forum Nutrition / Health
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-07-2008, 07:39 AM
  4. Pro and Cons of my new diet...
    By PumpingIron in forum Nutrition / Health
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-26-2007, 01:10 PM
  5. Pros and Cons of using ECA with PH's
    By bigbadboss101 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-26-2002, 10:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in