GH, did i read it here?

  1. New Member
    phatkid77's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    318
    Level
    15
    Lv. Percent
    78.43%

    GH, did i read it here?


    did i read Dr. John say GH will not cause cancerous growth at physiological dosages?? i've read on another board up to 4iu/day is pretty safe, but it wasnt a study,

    so, is there any links to studies that prove 1-2iu/day is generally risk free???

    while id love to get my levels tested, if i was low and GH safeness is in question i would bypass....BUT, if its safe AND SOMEHOW COVERED under benefits....im in

    phats

  2. Professional Member
    JanSz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    2417
    Level
    45
    Lv. Percent
    61.65%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by phatkid77 View Post
    did i read Dr. John say GH will not cause cancerous growth at physiological dosages?? i've read on another board up to 4iu/day is pretty safe, but it wasnt a study,

    so, is there any links to studies that prove 1-2iu/day is generally risk free???

    while id love to get my levels tested, if i was low and GH safeness is in question i would bypass....BUT, if its safe AND SOMEHOW COVERED under benefits....im in

    phats
    I did ask some question HGH vs cancer.

    I had liposarcoma in my left tigh removed.

    this type of cancer is responsive to HGH so I cant use it.
    Actually I have read some studies suggesting use of HGH antagonist to treat sarcoma.
    ===========
    I think use of HGH is sort of roulette for people who already have a cancer.

    Those who do not are possibly protecting their bodies by using it.

    Not sure but possibly similar situation exist as when using testosterone.
    Those who have prostate cancer (or other cancer that responds to testosterone) shoud not use it.
    I have enlarged prostate and PSA~4 so it took me a while before I made decission on using testosterone.
    I went thru 6 biopsies of my prostate, all negative so I made my personal decission to use T.

    Doctors facing somebody in my condition are of little help.
    --------------------
    one biopsy= 12shots with 12" long needles going thru prostate.
    8 shots in each quadrant (systematical) plus 4 random into "suspect" location.

    my friend in Poland had to have his first biopsy stopped half way thru, 6 days hospital stay.

    God bless USA and its medical system with its shortcommings.
  3. New Member
    cpeil2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    414
    Rep Power
    305
    Level
    16
    Lv. Percent
    21.05%

    Quote Originally Posted by phatkid77 View Post
    BUT, if its . . . SOMEHOW COVERED under benefits....im in

    phats

    Good luck.
    •   
       

  4. New Member
    phatkid77's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    353
    Rep Power
    318
    Level
    15
    Lv. Percent
    78.43%

    lol... i figure it wouldnt be covered... ill get my wife to put it in at the pharmacy just for giggles....see what it say....denied i bet


    phats

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-27-2005, 09:54 AM
  2. JANET JACKSON...did everyone see it?
    By good_guye28 in forum General Chat
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-04-2004, 09:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in