Well Mex, you have to be careful when talking about "IGF-1". lr3IGF-1? Endogenous IGF-1???
Also, you ask about "mass building".....muscle mass? Overall bodymass? See, IGF-1 affects not only muscle tissue, but other tissues as well (intestional, organs, etc). Also, muscle mass may mean increased weight per gram of muscle (for example) which may imply water weight or glycogen (or both), OR, increased muscle mass may be from an increased number of new muscle cells. This stuff isn't real straight-forward.
What the above study implies is that DES 1-3 has "approximately 10-fold more potent than IGF-1 at stimulating hypertrophy and proliferation of cultured cells" vs. endogenous IGF-1, due to DES 1-3's lack of affinity for IGFBPs.
Now, pick apart that claim....it's talking about hypertrophy and proliferation of CULTURED CELLS. This is NOT a human study. Cultured cells are vastly different than a human being. And what does "potent" mean? There were no claims on DES 1-3's ability to generate 10x muscle mass gains in humans or even pigs (or rats).
Furthermore, Lr3IGF-1 was designed artificially to resist binding (deactivation) as is DES 1-3. I think a great study would be to compre the "effectiveness" of these to analogs at increasing muslce "hypertrophy" and/or "hyperplasia".
I am extremely unfamiliar with DES 1-3 and haven't even read one full study on it. So, I recommend that you read and read and read on this analog and see what researchers have discovered it to do in animal models. This is interesting conversation though!