What is the difference?
Both are SARMs that were created by GTX for different purposes.
It seems the target market for Ostarine is Andropause and the target for Andarine are Cancer Patients as it supposedly flys under the radar of cancer and does not stimulate its growth.
Couple of links:
Thanks. That is what I figured. Im glad you cleared things up for me.
So do you think its safe to start using sarms. I know its fairly new as far as still not in phaze 3 fda testing.
Not like research peptides are in ANY phase of FDA testing and we use those based on our own research info and anecdotal evidence.
Same can be said about steroids, the way we use them here.
Wait a bit and see if BabyBlu keeps posting while running S-4. As long as he does, thats enough for me
Your right. Soon as I can afford it I would love to try it.
I was thinking safe compared to superdrol haladrol pp, epistane etc. Maybe a stack? I still have some HD and PP left and epistane. For a future cycle.
On a scale of 1-11 so the effectiveness seems like a 7 out of 11.
hmmm. effectiveness? what effect are you judging. Strength, Hypertrophy, Liver Values, HDL/LDL, etc? What are you comparing this to? Test, Deca, Tren, etc?
Pretty general statement, and in itself has no real meaning.
BTW, why "1-11"?!
On a scale of 9 to -5, my confusion level is a 11 here
Well I was thinking like strength, size compared to like superdrol, epistane. I know the sides are way better than something like superdrol hyperdrol etc no liver toxicity; no affect on the prostate no effect on breast tissue no effect on the heart and minimal effect on HPTA I know. I was thinking maybe stack with a low dose of epistane or low dose of superdrol.
once my injury heals i will do a full two month cycle of S4 at 200mg/day
i maybe running that with some peps but depends on timing.
currently doing 3on 4 off using S4 (200mg/day),its a new way of pulsing, talked to some people that has done that with mdrol and such with no sides for months, where regular pulse fck people up.
lets not debate about that pulse...just letting you know i will be logging soon after my tri's heal.
so far on 'ON' days, i feel good psychologically, not much growth, just hardness i feel during 3days of on, wonder how others will do at higher dosage and longer duration?
when i first heard of S4 i was let down that it still affected HPTA, but nontheless it sounds interesting so im taking it.
i would love to try future SARM's that wont affect HPTA and only muscles....sweeet! i will be on something like that rest of my life.
imagine females using these stuff with no androgenic sides, thats going to replace alot of chemicals in the future, anxillary and so on. **** it will replace everything for both men and women.
Well I havent seen any conclusive research evidence that S-4 has a significant negative impact on the HPTA. In fact GTX claims that SARMS enhance libido. I know that my libido currently is about normal for me. Ejaculate amounts are not down. I think the thing that most people forget about the human studies done on S-4 is that the sample group were men in their 60s-80's I believe. So people look at the study and say that the amount of LBM increase after 3 months was only like 6 lbs. But I would wager that 500mg of test enth a week would not put on much more LBM on men in their 60-80s with NO exercise. Now of course test enth would probably put on a significant amt of water weight to men no matter their age but actual lbm (again in light of no exercise routine) would be minimal. So you have to put S-4 studies (like everything in this world) into the proper context.
Im not making any projections on this stuff. Im just hopeful and also I did notice an increase in vascularity the last couple of days. Last night I noticed a 'new' vein in the lower palm of my hand, under my thumb. Odd.
Humm. This is defiantly the future.