IGF-1 worth it?
- 11-16-2007, 04:44 PM
He got 50 mcgs bilaterally for 6 weeks during pct. Other than lethargy and a noticeable metabolic advantage :burg: , his frame looked the same. Although, results with IGF use may not manifest during the cycle.
I will give him another round of treatment with some epi, next year .
- 11-21-2007, 07:23 AM
11-21-2007, 08:07 AM
11-21-2007, 08:25 AM
01-11-2008, 11:11 PM
They say a high dose of EPA is as good as IGF ; itís anti-catabolic effects are shown to be even more potent than IGF-1 from what I understand. Id go with GHRP6 and MGF.
01-12-2008, 04:18 PM
It has been worth it from my one cycle with it. The cycle was not run very well, I did the IGF every day and in retrospect I realize this was a waste and unnecessarily shut down natural production.
This time I'm running it 4 days a week (immediately PWO) and going to keep going for 5-6 weeks at 30-40mcg split bilat.
I'll also be dove tailing (ie the last 1-2 weeks will be concurrent) with GHRP-6 and Hexaralin each at 100-150mcg a night (together sub Q). I'll run that for 2-4 weeks or whatever my finances allow.
I would love to find a cheap source for Hexaralin (hint hint!).
I'll be sure to report on my experience, peace ya'll!
01-16-2008, 10:12 AM
01-18-2008, 04:52 PM
01-19-2008, 01:12 AM
01-22-2008, 03:51 PM
01-22-2008, 05:11 PM
01-22-2008, 09:06 PM
I have seen and used quite a bit of igf over the past couple of years. I miss the pre-ORD days fo sho!
I have used GroPep and generic chinese. I do think the GroPep was better but I have seen (not ran) 97-98% chinese igf that I would say would be very close to GroPep.
Igf is a great peptide but I do get tired of the lethargy.
01-23-2008, 09:39 AM
01-23-2008, 09:48 AM
01-23-2008, 11:30 AM
01-23-2008, 11:52 AM
01-23-2008, 08:31 PM
Nothing has pointed to IGF CAUSING such a thing. That's like people accusing steroids for hair loss. If your predisposed for it the process just speeds up.
01-23-2008, 11:11 PM
01-24-2008, 09:14 AM
01-28-2008, 09:43 AM
01-28-2008, 11:28 AM
02-03-2008, 12:54 AM
02-12-2008, 07:55 AM
as long as you have good igf and use enough it is well worth it. i have used it many of times and loved the results. i know alot of people that are cheap and try to get away with shooting 40mcgs a day so they dont have to buy 2 or 3 bottles and then wonder why they are not having good results. 50mcgs shot twice a day works great for me
03-24-2008, 03:50 AM
i voted yes. im now opening my mind to the notion, that many others have, that good old IGF-1 injected several times a day is better than LR3 because it stays site specific and does not go systemic. After this next course im doing(mgf+lr3 igf-1) im going to do an mgf+igf-1(non lr3) to compare the difference and see if there is any site specific growth.
for the same reasons I also feel that regular mgf injections may be more effective than less frequent peg-MGF ones.
I dont mind being a pin cushion, a few years back I did a long pgf2a course, nothing will ever compare to how bad that **** makes you feel. lol on my first day I really believed I was going to be found dead on the ****ter.
03-24-2008, 08:50 AM
I have been reading on another forum that IGF DOES NOT cause hyperplasia and its main intent is for muscle hypertrophy. I reading the debate as it goes on but any more info showing IGF does or does not cause hyperplasia would be a great benefit, because if it does not cause hyperplasia then I would feel it is useless for that is the only reason I would take it for.
Similar Forum Threads
- By LS1Sick in forum SupplementsReplies: 7Last Post: 11-19-2012, 01:36 AM
- By superset2 in forum IGF-1/GHReplies: 10Last Post: 12-08-2005, 01:10 AM
- By Billy the kid in forum IGF-1/GHReplies: 4Last Post: 06-28-2004, 04:39 PM
- By alittlewhiteboy in forum AnabolicsReplies: 1Last Post: 08-10-2003, 09:31 AM
- By max silver in forum AnabolicsReplies: 6Last Post: 05-04-2003, 01:02 AM