Mmmkay grunt, I have no idea what that means but I'm guessing you're not a fan of AR's work?
AR's "work" is basically a scam.
He draws utterly unwarranted conclusions from some research, makes up "facts" and passes off opinions as science. And he goes into such detail, that proving him wrong would require whoever does it to write about 10 times the amount he does, so many and intricate are the "mistakes" in his stuff. Myself and a Ph.D. authority on the boards laugh at that all the time. But basically we don't have the time to get into hundred-pages long arguments that most will not be able to follow anyways. It would just prove that we are foolishly childish in showing people that he is wrong, wrong, and wrong again. So I just state: "AR's stuff is utter bull****". Saves time, equally effective.