lr3igf-1 low dosage cycle for 10 weeks???
- 04-18-2006, 06:59 PM
lr3igf-1 low dosage cycle for 10 weeks???
whats everyone's thoughts on running a low dose ~20mcgs ED or a hair less for around 10 weeks. was thinking about researching this on my guinea pig in a future cycle of testenan, eq, masterdrol lasting 10 weeks. would probably start it 2 weeks in and run it 2 weeks into pct. i know everyone talks about 1gf-1 receptor down regulation after 4 or 5 weeks but everyone i seen has been running at least 40mcgs ED. i would be shooting for hypeplasia with this. was thinking about throwing x-factor in with it but according to the writeup, x-factor promotes the use of igf-1 more for hypertrophy. any help would be greatly appreciated.
- 04-18-2006, 07:05 PM
The igf starts to lose its effectiveness right around the 4-5 week mark. Since that is the case, its pretty much pointless to run low doses for 10 weeks. IMO, I would run the igf during the middle of your cycle, then take a 4 week break, and then run it at the start of your PCT.
04-18-2006, 07:39 PM
04-18-2006, 08:16 PM
Originally Posted by idunk42
Yeah but unfortunately no one has really run it low dosage for that long. Everyone wants to run these crazy high cycles. Personally I have been wanting someone to try a lower dosage cycle for a longer period of time. Just because gains taper down doesn't mean they should stop, there is no such thing as complete receptor downregulation, that would be near impossible. There is a possibility of antibody production which could compete for the receptor but I don't think that is the case, guess we will find out.
If you try it keep us updated bro I would love to hear back.
04-18-2006, 09:49 PM
I too am interested in low dose/long range protocols for IGF1 (more for anti-aging and body re-composition). However, I was thinking more like 5 to 10mcgs daily for 4 months. 20mcgs is a viable dosage advocated for a full 4-6 week cycles. I suppose what we need to ferret out is the actual circulating IGF1 levels in teenagers males (when I believe the concentration is highest) and try and match or slightly exceed that level. 2slow, can I ask how you arrived at 20mcgs as a dosage protocol?
I just finished 5 weeks at 40mcgs daily (20 x 2) and where I gained no size or any other ergogenic benefit I can discern, the shape and body re-composition was wonderful—and though subjective, I swear I look younger.
04-18-2006, 10:02 PM
i'm into day 33 of IGF @ 16mcg 2x/day (32mcg/day) and going strong. last cycle dose was about 60mcg/day and it stopped working before day 25.
there might be something to this...my muscles still feel like they're going to pop if i shoot anywhere near my workout.
04-18-2006, 11:36 PM
Then maybe 20mcgs isn't a bad starting point after all. same old do you have a log and are you running any AAS with it?
04-19-2006, 06:43 AM
nothing really scientific about how i came up with it i guess. cost was one factor. then i figured a good starting point might be half a normal dose run twice as longOriginally Posted by Ronn38
maybe it would be a good idea to run low dosage t3 along with this for the same effect it is used for on an aas cycle????
04-19-2006, 08:27 PM
yes, plenty of AAS. i've run 2 IGF cycles in the course of this AAS cycle (test/EQ/tbol) and noticed great body recomp effects both times, over and above the steroid effects. no big weight gain or strength gains with the IGF, but there is a fullness and a muscle quality that IGF imparts that sticks with you. it's really something else.Originally Posted by Ronn38
no log. up 12lbs, which is alot for me as i am well above my genetic limit and i weigh 280lbs (i am eating more often than i am NOT eating!)
oh, and if i can comment on low-dose T3 during a cycle: it doesnt keep fat off, it just holds you back gains-wise. T3 just eats up whatever is available - muscle, fat, glycogen - it doesnt prefer fat. why would anyone want a faster metabolism when they are trying to add muscle??? never made any sense to me.
04-20-2006, 11:10 AM
i was thinking ~25mcg's ed since the aas would suppress it, keeping the metabolism up just a bit to clear the receptors i bit faster.Originally Posted by same_old
04-20-2006, 11:56 AM
Glad to hear the lower LR3 dosages are working for you guys. I was kind of hoping they would . That is my next log as well, mgf with low dose lr3.
Some_Old- how much further did you say you were gonna run this? Hopefully the gains continue to come with the LR3, if not then I am going to attempt multiple back to back LR3 cycles with short bridges in between
04-20-2006, 08:14 PM
LMD - if you dont get my name right i am going to track you down through your IP, sneak into your house and kill you in your sleep.Originally Posted by LakeMountD
i am going to run it as long as it keeps working.
04-20-2006, 08:52 PM
hehe I do keep doing it just to see if you notice lol.Originally Posted by same_old
The first few times I truly was getting it wrong, after that I wanted to see if you would look for that lol.
But yea keep us updated as long as you feel it working. The problem is, some people still "feel" the effects like hunger, etc. but stop seeing results. Since you are on AAS like I was, it is a little harder to gauge as well. But I am sure you can attest to the mad hunger pangs!!!!! AAS + IGF = ouch in the middle of the night!
04-21-2006, 12:54 AM
I will be running the igf i recieved from crowler over the next 4 months. I will be keeping a log on AM and my dosing will be like this:
Since I am training HST style and will only be lifting 3x a week I will only shoot it into my lagging muscles bilaterally post workout.
Monday - 20mcg bilaterally
Wed -20mcg bilaterally
Fri - 20mcg bilaterally
Which would be 16 weeks total by the time I am through. I am shooting post workout into the lagging muscle inhopes for a localized growth effect. I know the claims of igf being systemic..(which LR3 is) however immediately following muscle trauma injecting igf into the muscle, the more readily available igf receptors will absorb much more than normal and by using such a low dose i am hoping to keep the systemic effects to a minimum.
I understand what LMD is saying about 2x a day injects to keep blood levels of IGF elevated. However, since the highest concentration of IGF-1 receptors are in the intestines and I would prefer for the igf not attaching to other cells I do not wish to go, I chose to keep my injections post workout only.
Anyways im sure there will be much debate over this subject for a while... But I will stick with my plan and keep a detailed log so you all will know how it works out.
04-21-2006, 12:55 AM
Dertynasty, Im definitely interested in this log that you plan on running. Once you start the log, I'll most definitely be following. Good luck with it bro.Originally Posted by dertynasty
04-21-2006, 01:03 AM
just need to find a place that sells BOTH AA and NaCL or BW I want to start monday but i dont know any fast place with them available.
04-22-2006, 11:10 PM
04-23-2006, 04:33 AM
Yeah I actually ordered my pins and NaCl from them about 2 mins after that post. However they didnt have the AA in stock but I guess I dont need it. 1Mg/ml should be just fine as is.Originally Posted by Neuromancer
04-23-2006, 04:45 AM
word on the street is that they'll have it again Derty.. it's good to have just to make dosing easier, but you're right.. you can manage with 1000mcg/ml..
04-23-2006, 06:40 PM
Anyways guys I will be starting tomorrow as soon as the pins and NaCl get here. Only thing I'm having trouble with is deciding how I want to run it.
Since I will be hitting the full body 3x a week with my training I was planning on pinning my lagging parts Post workout.
Now the hard part of my decision is do i run it like:
Mon/Wed/Fri - 20mcg pwo (10mcg each Bilateral side.)
Mon/Wed/Fri - 20 mcg pwo (5mcg each side of 2 muscle groups, ie. Bis/Chest) So it would be 20mcg/4 spots
Mon/Wed/Fri - 40 mcg PWO (10mcg into 2 muscle groups.. 4 muscles again total) ie.. Tris/Bi's 40mcg/4 spots
I really cant decide if i want to pin 4x post workout or not and if i do choose that method i cant decide if i should do 20mcg or 40mcg divided.
If any of you have opinions i would love to hear them, thats what this post is for, lol.
04-24-2006, 02:51 PM
04-24-2006, 06:17 PM
I think its a little too complicated. My suggestion is not to worry about hitting every muscle group worked and possibly forget the bilateral injections. I have run lr3 at least half a dozen times and after just a few gave up on the bilateral injection theory. Now I just split my total dose (anywhere from 80 - 150mcgs) into two shots per day...ED. The first half first thing in the morning with my gh and second half either pre workout or post workout depending whether I am running slin at the same time. Ideally I would like to do my first lr3 injection a few hours after my first gh dose, but with work and school its just not possible.Originally Posted by dertynasty
I still do have some hope for localized growth, although that is certainly fading as well. So I do still inject my lagging parts, or try and correspond with what body part was worked that day. However I do just hit one side, and the next day...the opposite side of whatever muscle group it happend to be.
In your case, where you do an entire body workout, I would just keep your sites moving each day. If you do want to stick with the bilateral injections one day pick bi's. the next pick tri's...etc,etc. I assure you, you won't see a bit of difference doing it either way.
I do also suggest running it ED. IMO, it really needs to be run ED, not like gh which can be cut down to 5on/2off for financial reasons. You are only using lr3 for a short period of time anyway, so try and use it ED if possible.
04-24-2006, 06:22 PM
I really cant decide if i want to pin 4x post workout or not and if i do choose that method i cant decide if i should do 20mcg or 40mcg divided. [IMG]images/smilies/frown.gif[/IMG]
a little bit of the igf is going to be left in each of those 4 pins... that many shots will lead to a lot of unintentional waste (yeah, backloading BW will help some, but still)
04-24-2006, 08:38 PM
04-24-2006, 11:02 PM
If I do go post, then yea I shoot immediately after. Even before I start to drink my shake. But I am really liking running lr3 and slin together, so its mostly pre workout anymore.
04-25-2006, 04:09 PM
04-25-2006, 08:02 PM
if anyone cares, my low-dose (16mcg shots, 12 hours apart) IGF trial ended. about 38 days of noticeable effects; way longer than the previous run @ 40-50mcg/day but still, the results faded.
04-25-2006, 08:07 PM
At what point did the results start to fade? How noticeable was it? Thanks bro.Originally Posted by same_old
04-25-2006, 11:01 PM
04-26-2006, 12:41 AM
With the half life though it doesn't really matter if you get some downregulation, it is in your blood for quit a long ass time, which is why the two a day injections will be sufficient for attaching to the receptors. Plus there is no scientific evidence that rapid downregulation occurs. To top that off even if it did occur we do not know if it will still be able to get its job done even with half receptors. The one study I have on it showed a 50% drop in receptors in the small intestine of like a pig or something with exogenous recombinant IGF-1 (at SUPER high dosages, we are talking like 600mcg per kg bodyweight), but at the same time showed a double in plasma IGF-1 levels. So you figure if this is the case with LR3 IGF-1 then it shouldn't matter too much about receptors since LR3 lasts longer in the blood than rIGF-1.Originally Posted by Grunt76
derty- I agree with what was said above, forget bilateral injections and hitting every muscle group, i mean if you want to you can to see if you get better results, but i seriously doubt it and it might just be more of a burden then anything else.
SAME_old (there ya go haha)- Thanks for doin that study man, good work on that, interesting it lasted 38 days. How did you gauge the results at 40-50mcg? How long did it last? Still not sure of the connection on why it is fading. Either it truly is do to less MGF and proliferation, downregulation of receptors, antibody production, or some other unknown link in the hGH axis (since gains with hGH are caused by IGF-1 for the most part and the gains continue for long periods).
Similar Forum Threads
- By Losgt500 in forum Post Cycle TherapyReplies: 14Last Post: 02-23-2012, 09:25 PM
- By thething86 in forum AnabolicsReplies: 16Last Post: 12-07-2008, 12:41 AM
- By phluxX in forum Post Cycle TherapyReplies: 26Last Post: 10-15-2008, 09:52 PM
- By TonsKGB in forum Cycle InfoReplies: 1Last Post: 03-04-2005, 07:39 PM
- By MikeK in forum AnabolicsReplies: 1Last Post: 09-04-2004, 08:18 PM