start with igf-1

[accordconcept]

is it ok to make my 1st cycle with igf-1...maybe stacked w/ test....or should i stick to AAS for a few cycles.

 

[glenihan]

i say stick to just test for a first cycle only because you won't know what to attribute to the test and what to attribute to another compound .. you'll be better off IMO by knowing how you react to individual compounds to prepare in the future

otherwise how will you know if the IFG did anything or was worth the cost?

 

[Ubiquitous]

I'm anxiously awaiting a post of Glenihan's that I disagree with.

You've won this round, but this can't go on indefinitely.:whip:

 

[Neuromancer]

Save it for PCT. Although you probably should run it alone for the first time to see how it affects you.

but.... if you already have it, PCT will work out nicely.

 

[accordconcept]

well i already have test and ifg-1. So i was either gonna run a just test cycle, then igf-1(probably with test too), or just start off with igf-1 since its a lil safer IMO then test, just as a breaker iner...dig?

 

[judge-mental]

safer? the sides are maybe less noticeable but that doesn't mean safer.
I'd say test than IGF.

 

[Ubiquitous]

You should really guage how you react to Test standalone now.. otherwise you will never know.. trust me.. you go apeshit after your first.

I concur with Neuromancer. Use it for PCT. (since you already have it)...Then next cycle (there will be another) use it concurrent.. and for PCT.



and the one after that, use plutonium.:type: