GHRP-6 worth it?

Page 2 of 7 First 1234 ... Last

  1. Quote Originally Posted by TheDarkHalf View Post
    Please disregard his opinion. GHRP and CJC-1295 are SYNERGISTIC (think 1+1=10) and one should not be ran without the other.

    If anyone is intersted in adding in huperzine a, I would recommend doing so after a month or so of GHRP/CJC use. Mainly because you'll be able to identify if anything negative comes up from the addition and secondly you'll notice a hell of a difference which i think is important to be able to see how powerful the huperzine can be (which should be dosed around 100mcg - 250mcg)
    bull**** bro, you can get fantastic results using just CJC-1295 solo or with the huperzine- a without any GHRP. People use GHRP as an addition to their cycles because its the cheaper route to go. Take that extra $$ you'd spend on GHRP and jack your CJC-1295 to 3000 mcg/wk and tell me you dont get better results


  2. Look at dats studies. Cjc alone raises the baseline of gh, or trough. you get no pulse or actual raise till you send a signal with one of the ghrp's. I have been reading on his forum and others for the longest time. Dat and everyone else recommends them together for their synergy. You may get some benefit off cjc alone, but not like you would off both. All medical studies, in fact you would get more off ghrp alone then cjc.
    •   
       

  3. Borrowed from Datbtrue


    We need only to examine the results of the normal test subjects from three oft-cited studies that established the relevant protocol.

    In the first study "Inhibition of growth hormone release after the combined administration of GHRH and GHRP-6 in patients with Cushing's syndrome", Alfonso Leal-Cerro..., Clinical Endocrinology 1994, 41 (5) , 649654, three different peptide/peptide combinations were used.

    GHRH was administered alone at 100mcg. This resulted in area under the curve (AUC) measured for 120 minutes of GH secretion of 1420 330.

    GHRP-6 was administered alone at 100mcg. This resulted in area under the curve (AUC) measured for 120 minutes of GH secretion of 2278 290.

    GHRH plus GHRP-6 was administered together at 100mcg each. This resulted in area under the curve (AUC) measured for 120 minutes of GH secretion of 7332 592.

    As a single dose these results show that GHRP-6 is about twice as effective as GHRH.

    The synergy between GHRH & GHRP-6 is clearly evident as co-administration resulted in twice the benefit of the additive values of single doses of the two peptides.

    The second study is the one that established the saturation dose for these peptides often used in other studies. "Growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptide stimulates GH release in normal men and acts synergistically with GH-releasing hormone ", CY Bowers..., J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., Apr 1990; 70: 975-982.

    In that study GHRH at a dose of 1.0 microgram/kg was administered alone and then together with various doses of GHRP-6 (0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 microgram/kg). They found that the submaximal dosages of 0.1 and 0.3 microgram/kg GHRP-6 plus 1 microgram/kg GHRH did have the effect of stimulating GH release synergistically.

    However the larger dose of 1 mcg/kg of GHRP-6 was found to be the saturation dose when used in combination w/ 1 mcg/kg of GHRH.

    It is also noteworthy that serum prolactin and cortisol levels rose about 2-fold above base levels only at the 1 microgram/kg dose of GHRP-6 and not at the submaximal dosages.

    The final study, "Preserved Growth Hormone (GH) Secretion in Aged and Very Old Subjects after Testing with the Combined Stimulus GH-Releasing Hormone plus GH-Releasing Hexapeptide-6", Micic D..., J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Jul;83(7):2569-72 is fascinating for several reasons.

    By reference to citation it is noted that "GHRH plus GHRP-6 (both at saturating dose) is nowadays considered the most potent stimulus of GH secretion in man being able to restore the GH secretion in states associated with chronic blockade of somatotroph activity (as in obesity)...it elicits a near-normal GH discharge in obesity, in patients with hypothyroidism and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus."

    This particular study examined the effects of combined administration of GHRH, immediately followed by GHRP-6 in a group of very old subjects (age higher than 75 yr), as compared with both normal adults (less than 40 yr) and aged subjects (age 4665 yr). The dosing levels used were 90mcg of GHRH followed by 1mcg/kg of GHRP-6.

    All the subjects had a positive GH secretory response to the combined administration with no differences observed between men and women. However the group comprising the very old had the highest level of GH release followed by the group comprising the aged subjects with the "less than 40 yr group" experiencing a substantial rise but not as high as the other two groups.

    The study concluded that the lack of side-effects & safety of the protocol and the discovered lack of age-related decline in the "GHRH-GHRP-6-mediated GH release opens the possibility of using it as a therapeutical tool to revert some deleterious manifestations of aging in man."
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  4. Quote Originally Posted by CoorsLight126 View Post
    bull**** bro, you can get fantastic results using just CJC-1295 solo or with the huperzine- a without any GHRP. People use GHRP as an addition to their cycles because its the cheaper route to go. Take that extra $$ you'd spend on GHRP and jack your CJC-1295 to 3000 mcg/wk and tell me you dont get better results
    So, this above study and graph shows that GHRP is still better alone (first graph) than a GHRH which in turn tells me your statement above claming that GHRH will give you better results than GHRP is incorrect. The second graph shows them being very similar, but the two of them together is GREATLY much more significant.

    People use GHRP in addition to their cycles because it provides a synergy, and provides results that are better than a GHRP or GHRH alone.

    I just don't see the point in pinning 3g of GHRH a week. Sure you could do it...but why? when it's PROVEN that a smaller combination of GHRH/GHRP is going to be better (and it's not proven that 3g of GHRH will give you better results.....).

    GHRP is also CHEAPER than GHRH. Don't know where you're shopping at, but I can get 5mg of GHRP-2 for 5 bucks cheaper than a 2mg bottle of a GHRH.

    We don't take lightly to outlandish claims around here Coors. Please be ready to back up your position if you make such a claim.

    Don't take this the wrong way either, I'm more concerned about educating you and others more than anything else.

    But someone's gotta lay the smack down.

  5. All in the studies.
    •   
       


  6. Quote Originally Posted by diesel7 View Post
    All in the studies.
    Word.

  7. Things got confusing and kind of heated in here - anyone want to help me out with some cliff's notes, if I admit I'm just being super duper lazy?

  8. Quote Originally Posted by Outstanding View Post
    Things got confusing and kind of heated in here - anyone want to help me out with some cliff's notes, if I admit I'm just being super duper lazy?
    Not heated at all. I'm cool . Just showing the new guy how things roll around here.

    So what do you want to know?

  9. Quote Originally Posted by TheDarkHalf View Post
    Not heated at all. I'm cool . Just showing the new guy how things roll around here.

    So what do you want to know?
    I'd like to know how to eat cornbread and ice cream cake every day without gaining fat... but specifically, I'd like to know what has the best synergy without worrying about desensitization, and the most dramatic recomping effect.

  10. Quote Originally Posted by Outstanding View Post
    I'd like to know how to eat cornbread and ice cream cake every day without gaining fat... but specifically, I'd like to know what has the best synergy without worrying about desensitization, and the most dramatic recomping effect.
    I would go with GHRP-2 and Mod GRF 1-29. Should recomp you nicely, won't raise prolactin, won't raise cortisol, won't desensitize. I would start smaller and work your way up to saturation dose (roughly 100mcg unless you're over 200lbs). So i'd start with 50mcg 3x a day just so you can assess tolerance. Dose AM, Post Workout, and before bed. Then up it to 75mcg 3x a day, and then 100mcg 3 times a day.

    After you've been on a month or two, add in huperzine a. Just be careful, this stuff will really make the peptides kick HARD. So start with a small dose 100mcg for a week and assess results.

    The only time I would recommend GHRP-6 is when you're looking for a large increase in hunger. GHRP-2 is a 2nd gen peptide and has less sides (no hunger, prolactin, or cortisol increase) where the GHRP-6 has all of these to a slight degree.

  11. any info on the saturation dose if you are over 200lbs? Is it in dat's massive thread?

  12. Quote Originally Posted by ticco View Post
    any info on the saturation dose if you are over 200lbs? Is it in dat's massive thread?
    Just know that maximal effective dosing is at 1mcg/kg

  13. Quote Originally Posted by TheDarkHalf View Post
    Just know that maximal effective dosing is at 1mcg/kg
    thanks for the info, reps.

  14. Quote Originally Posted by TheDarkHalf View Post
    I would go with GHRP-2 and Mod GRF 1-29. Should recomp you nicely, won't raise prolactin, won't raise cortisol, won't desensitize. I would start smaller and work your way up to saturation dose (roughly 100mcg unless you're over 200lbs). So i'd start with 50mcg 3x a day just so you can assess tolerance. Dose AM, Post Workout, and before bed. Then up it to 75mcg 3x a day, and then 100mcg 3 times a day.

    After you've been on a month or two, add in huperzine a. Just be careful, this stuff will really make the peptides kick HARD. So start with a small dose 100mcg for a week and assess results.

    The only time I would recommend GHRP-6 is when you're looking for a large increase in hunger. GHRP-2 is a 2nd gen peptide and has less sides (no hunger, prolactin, or cortisol increase) where the GHRP-6 has all of these to a slight degree.
    Thank you so much, reps sent your way. I have ran GHRP-2 before, ended up mega-dosing it to test it's validity and potency, it was real haha! My jaw began to protrude within a week to the point I no longer had an overbite, it was unreal.

    I was dosing Huperzine-A as well, but I was injecting pre-workout since I have carbohydrates post workout.

    I'm glad I was informed about Hex's propensity to desensitize quickly.

    Would you estimate that this combo you listed above would be more dynamic and fast acting than real hgh? I have a couple sources, but just can't, and probably never will, justify the necessary investment.

    PS: I'm over 230

  15. yeah bro I feel you I'm over 230 myself and because I am not sh1tting out money, I cannot justify the cost of exogenous GH. I really enjoyed the combo of GHRP and cjc. I found them to be synergistic.. And not calling out coors but results will vary from person to person, considering that we are not part of a controlled lab study and we all use different sources, which could have different concentrations at any given time. Gear and peps can always be overdosed, underdosed, bunk or old, so there is hardly ever a guarantee on anything. You seem to be really opinionated and there's NOTHING wrong with having that assertive quality yet a lot of claims made on this board (not calling you out by any means) are rather subjective.

    I personally liked the pep combo, and found that the fact that it is non suppressive (for the most part) gives it an edge over exogenous GH.
    NTBM Line @ NUTRAPLANET

    All posts are for entertainment purposes only.

    Need2slin... NOM NOM NOM :yup:

  16. Quote Originally Posted by Outstanding View Post
    Thank you so much, reps sent your way. I have ran GHRP-2 before, ended up mega-dosing it to test it's validity and potency, it was real haha! My jaw began to protrude within a week to the point I no longer had an overbite, it was unreal.

    I was dosing Huperzine-A as well, but I was injecting pre-workout since I have carbohydrates post workout.

    I'm glad I was informed about Hex's propensity to desensitize quickly.

    Would you estimate that this combo you listed above would be more dynamic and fast acting than real hgh? I have a couple sources, but just can't, and probably never will, justify the necessary investment.

    PS: I'm over 230
    Just do the post workout injection anyways. You can still do carbs after your injection, just wait 30 min post injection. You can do your protein immediately since carbs/fat are the only macros that blunt GH.

    I would expect it to be more dynamic and fast acting than HGH. Just speculation though, and I'm not 100 percent positive as i've never seen the study.

    But peptides are legal, cause a natural rise in GH, and are cheaper. I just don't see the need to both with black market HGH when peptides are just an overall better alternative.

  17. Quote Originally Posted by TheDarkHalf View Post
    Just do the post workout injection anyways. You can still do carbs after your injection, just wait 30 min post injection. You can do your protein immediately since carbs/fat are the only macros that blunt GH.

    I would expect it to be more dynamic and fast acting than HGH. Just speculation though, and I'm not 100 percent positive as i've never seen the study.

    But peptides are legal, cause a natural rise in GH, and are cheaper. I just don't see the need to both with black market HGH when peptides are just an overall better alternative.
    GREAT POST! Thanks once again.

  18. Hey dark half, where are you getting huperzine? pm me. also where can I find out more info on it. Thanks. Supposedly ghrp-2 and cjc1295 mod are the strongest stack you can get, with the least side affects. I have been on it for about a month so far, with ipamorelin at night. Liking my results so far.

  19. Quote Originally Posted by diesel7 View Post
    Hey dark half, where are you getting huperzine? pm me. also where can I find out more info on it. Thanks. Supposedly ghrp-2 and cjc1295 mod are the strongest stack you can get, with the least side affects. I have been on it for about a month so far, with ipamorelin at night. Liking my results so far.
    www.google.com

  20. Dark Half you mention adding Huperzine after a month or so "Just be careful, this stuff will really make the peptides kick HARD. So start with a small dose 100mcg for a week and assess results." For my clarification you mean 100mcg a week or per day. Sorry I am ignorant to subject I am just trying to soak all this in.

  21. Quote Originally Posted by stresmb View Post
    Dark Half you mention adding Huperzine after a month or so "Just be careful, this stuff will really make the peptides kick HARD. So start with a small dose 100mcg for a week and assess results." For my clarification you mean 100mcg a week or per day. Sorry I am ignorant to subject I am just trying to soak all this in.
    100mcg per day - it has a half life of about 5 hours....so you could do 100mcg then 100mcg again 5 hours later

    I just cautioned to start with the smaller dose of Huperzine A b/c we all react differently

  22. Thank you. Also I know your not a fan of people not doing there research but I have and still need to clear one thing up. I am running a GHRP-2 and CJC1293 experiment. The CJC1293 is listed as Mod 1-29 on site im purchasing from they list 1295 w/ dac as other option. So my question is : is CJC1293 = CJC1295 w/o dac? Again sorry for ignorance.

  23. Guys, read this article. It explains pretty much everything about GH surges and pulses on just CJC-1295 with huperzine a. You dont need the GHRP with it, you can get plenty of results with just CJC and huperzine. I'd rather get my CJC-1295 dose up at a decent whack than run "a little of this and a little of that" not to mention, sticking yourself 2-3x/day just ****ing blows, if you have any kind of life this is just ridiculous to do!!

    http://www.uk-muscle.co.uk/steroids-...h-reading.html

  24. Quote Originally Posted by stresmb View Post
    Thank you. Also I know your not a fan of people not doing there research but I have and still need to clear one thing up. I am running a GHRP-2 and CJC1293 experiment. The CJC1293 is listed as Mod 1-29 on site im purchasing from they list 1295 w/ dac as other option. So my question is : is CJC1293 = CJC1295 w/o dac? Again sorry for ignorance.
    Here is how it was explained to me, by someone that has a much greater knowledge of this than myself. The naming convention still messes me up too.

    There are various types of GHRH's. The only GHRH to consider is tetra-substituted CJC-1295 / CJC-1295(without DAC) / modGRF(1-29). They are all the same thing but with a different name.

    GRF(1-29) is produced and sold as a drug called Sermorelin. It has a short-half life measured in minutes. If you prefer analogies think of this as a Testosterone Suspension (i.e. unestered).

    To increase the stability and half-life of GRF(1-29) four amino acid changes where made to its structure. These changes increase the half-life beyond 30 minutes which is more than sufficient to exert a sustained effect which will maximize a GH pulse. This form is often called tetrasubstituted GRF(1-29) (or modified) and unfortunately & confusingly mislabeled as CJC-1295. If you prefer analogies think of this as a Testosterone Propionate (i.e. short-estered).

    Note that some may also refer to this as CJC-1295 without the DAC (Drug Affinity Complex).

    Frequent dosing of either the aforementioned modified GRF(1-29) or regular GRF(1-29) is required and as previously indicated works synergistically with a GHRP.

  25. Quote Originally Posted by CoorsLight126 View Post
    Guys, read this article. It explains pretty much everything about GH surges and pulses on just CJC-1295 with huperzine a. You dont need the GHRP with it, you can get plenty of results with just CJC and huperzine. I'd rather get my CJC-1295 dose up at a decent whack than run "a little of this and a little of that" not to mention, sticking yourself 2-3x/day just ****ing blows, if you have any kind of life this is just ridiculous to do!!

    http://www.uk-muscle.co.uk/steroids-...h-reading.html
    Yes I've read that post. And no, it's not an article. It's a post that originated from another website that I also belong to. A post that contains someone's OPINION. There are no cited references. No facts. All his own opinion which worked for him.

    Whereas my post a page back has cited references and data graphs from actual studies, disproving your original and ongoing claims of what you think works best (when I have science proving what we now know to best)

    Sticking yourself 2-3x per day isn't that hard to factor in to your life. 1 when you wake up, 1 after you work out, and 1 before going to sleep. Takes less than 60 sec per shot.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. EQ? Worth it?
    By xx Zues xx in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-06-2011, 05:37 PM
  2. PH are they worth it?
    By BadTobu in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 04-16-2010, 09:46 AM
  3. Proviron Worth it? EQ Worth it?
    By Tom 185 in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-15-2006, 12:02 AM
Log in
Log in