What do you guys think of this article on IGF?

  1. Registered User
    Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,016
    Rep Power
    714
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    28.14%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    What do you guys think of this article on IGF?



  2. New Member
    Myth's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Age
    50
    Posts
    42
    Rep Power
    149
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    95.61%

    I felt the article was excellent reading. He was referring to Long IGF-1 which makes it even more interesting.
  3. Board Supporter
    willieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Age
    50
    Posts
    270
    Rep Power
    263
    Level
    15
    Lv. Percent
    14.32%

    Quote Originally Posted by Myth
    I felt the article was excellent reading. He was referring to Long IGF-1 which makes it even more interesting.
    Look at the date too...its fairly old, but very good reading.My expirence so far is the IGF from our friends seems to be everthing it should be.
    •   
       

  4. New Member
    Gland777's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Age
    47
    Posts
    39
    Rep Power
    146
    Level
    6
    Lv. Percent
    0.38%

    He was NOT referring to IGF1 R3 Long. He was only discussing the old IGF1 which is VERY unstable at best.

    I would like the guys at Muscle Research to comment on this article!

    My IGF1 R3 is diluted in the BA and I have been very hungry...very full and tight and my pumps have been excellent.
  5. Registered User
    Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,016
    Rep Power
    714
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    28.14%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    He IS refering to R3 Long, he said so himself in the original topic.
  6. Registered User
    Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,016
    Rep Power
    714
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    28.14%
    Achievements Posting Pro
  7. Elite Member
    Matthew D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    5,014
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    46
    Lv. Percent
    99.2%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    okay not to be an ass but what is your point?
  8. I am faster than 80% of all snakes
    Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,911
    Rep Power
    7017

    Quote Originally Posted by Gland777

    My IGF1 R3 is diluted in the BA and I have been very hungry...very full and tight and my pumps have been excellent.
    But didn't you know that it doens't work?
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  9. New Member
    Gland777's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Age
    47
    Posts
    39
    Rep Power
    146
    Level
    6
    Lv. Percent
    0.38%

    not so!!


    He does NOT mention IGF1 R3....He is ONLY talking about the original IGF1. SHOW ME WHERE IT SAYS IGF1 R3 in the article.

    Besides...I have been taking it for one week now...and I am very impressed with the results. NO one can tell me that it is not working.









    Quote Originally Posted by Grant
    He IS refering to R3 Long, he said so himself in the original topic.
  10. New Member
    Gland777's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Age
    47
    Posts
    39
    Rep Power
    146
    Level
    6
    Lv. Percent
    0.38%

    Bo Bo...what is your take on all is??


    What do you believe after reading this article???


    Quote Originally Posted by Bobo
    But didn't you know that it doens't work?
  11. Elite Member
    Matthew D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    5,014
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    46
    Lv. Percent
    99.2%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Bobo uses IGF-1LR3 and likes it alot..
  12. Registered User
    Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,016
    Rep Power
    714
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    28.14%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew D
    okay not to be an ass but what is your point?
    I have no point, I am coming to you guys for help, not to make a point, I read the sticky and stuff on IGF, and am looking for yalls opinion on this.
  13. Registered User
    Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,016
    Rep Power
    714
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    28.14%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    2nd page of the topic, MT says...


    "Be mindful that the IGF we are referring to is not natty IGF-1. It is a modified version. There is no proof in existance(so far as I know) that binding proteins for IGF-1 long R3 will affect endogenous IGF-1. But nobody wants to find out, I'm sure! hGH is exactly like endogenous GH, and there should be no binding protein production. "
  14. Registered User
    Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,016
    Rep Power
    714
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    28.14%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    He never said it was deinently not working, he said that alot of it will have degraded in the BA, and all of it will not be active in the BA. Have you read the whole topic? All of this stuff is right there and easy to see. I am just asking if it is true or not.
  15. New Member
    gobig1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Age
    50
    Posts
    235
    Rep Power
    263
    Level
    12
    Lv. Percent
    89.55%

    Quote Originally Posted by Grant
    He never said it was deinently not working, he said that alot of it will have degraded in the BA, and all of it will not be active in the BA. Have you read the whole topic? All of this stuff is right there and easy to see. I am just asking if it is true or not.
    It does plant an interesting "reasonable doubt", I have used 4 bottles from MR and without a doubt can say it works, but the question is; How much is degraded, if any, from the BA? After all BA is a pretty harsh chemical. Also, how much more bio-active would the LR3IGF1 be by reconstituting with HCL, etc, and allowing all the peptides to "uncurl" and work their magical powers, it does mention a high dose was 15-20mcg when reconstituting with a correct PH HCL that supposedly allows for better bioavailability and thus better end results.

    Hmmmmm...............You have just entered the Twilight Zone....... do do do do........do do do do
  16. I am faster than 80% of all snakes
    Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,911
    Rep Power
    7017

    Its a simple an easy answer in which I have been telling people for months.

    Nobody knows!

    All these products degrade over time, just how much and for how long nobody knows. Insulin degrades significantly over 3 months. At what rate Long R3 will is unknown.

    All I know is that it works and works very well. You won't see studies on this beause its not meant for human use according to Gropep and I doubt you will ever see anything that use Long R3 in BA so it will still remain unknown. For those that keep saying iot degrades and is useless, then according to their logic insulin and GH shouldn't work either. Of course it degrades, its a peptide but I know it works and the results have been pretty consistent. Saying its useless or won't work because it degrades is stretching the truth quite a bit.
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  17. Elite Member
    DR.D's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  228 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    6,779
    Rep Power
    307853
    Level
    56
    Lv. Percent
    45.18%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    BA will degrade IGF-1 on the phenylalanine reside in the presence of salts. Mannitol is a good preservative in BA/aqueous solution. Don't cut w/ saline.
  18. Board Supporter
    jcam222's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    52
    Posts
    631
    Rep Power
    448
    Level
    20
    Lv. Percent
    55.1%

    Has anyone from MR ever posted as to their thoughts on reconstituing with BA? Do they use anything in addition to the BA as in perhaps mannitol in the one post? I am curious as to why all of the research companies recon in BA if there is a lot of opionion out there acetic acid may be better why do none of them use that?
  19. New Member
    aznurse's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Age
    65
    Posts
    32
    Rep Power
    143
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    80.98%

    Dr. D, or otherse, question on 'do not use saline to cut'. The BW sent by MR is BW with .9 normal saline. Some of use BW to backfill IGF-1 syringe. Any thoughts on the impact of saline on the syringe contents or is this regarding using saline to dilute IGF-1 in the vial?
  20. Elite Member
    DR.D's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  228 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    6,779
    Rep Power
    307853
    Level
    56
    Lv. Percent
    45.18%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by aznurse
    Dr. D, or otherse, question on 'do not use saline to cut'. The BW sent by MR is BW with .9 normal saline. Some of use BW to backfill IGF-1 syringe. Any thoughts on the impact of saline on the syringe contents or is this regarding using saline to dilute IGF-1 in the vial?
    Right, sorry for not being more specific. It's thermal degradation induced by the BA in the presence of NaCl, don't recon I mean. But backfilling is not an issue. That's why they don't send it in phosphate buffer. But mannitol is cheap, I don't know why it isn't prefered.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. what do you guys think of this?
    By liquidanimal in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-19-2009, 02:01 PM
  2. What do you guys think of this?
    By DerickVonD in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-23-2009, 06:20 PM
  3. Whats do you guys think of this stack?
    By NYCmuscle in forum Supplements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-27-2008, 09:08 PM
  4. What do you guys think of this.
    By sifu in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-08-2004, 08:03 PM
  5. what do you guys think of this?
    By WiNgS in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-09-2003, 04:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in