hi all, ive run gh before with great results however im looking to run again and wanted your input on proper injection. in a very abridged version, the general consensus is that for a proper subcutaneous injection, one is to pinch the fatty area/skin around the torso/midsection and poke, voila!

however i have recently found some compelling evidence that suggests that the absolute "best" and most effective application is to actually bypass as much fat as possible, pinching the fat and try to inject at a 45 degree angle in the "void" or skin area behind the fat and in front of the muscle. apparently trying to come in at an angle as opposed to directly into the fat, injecting behind as much fat as possible and in front of the muscle/abs is supposedly the "absolute" best way to inject. sure youre getting some in the fat but ive heard that this may be the best possible way for max results.

ergo, my two questions:
1. has anyone thats experienced with gh heard/read the same, etc?
2. gh also supposedly has "fat-eating" effects when injected directly into the fat, ie: site-enhancement and if that is "really" true, i wouldnt want to pass that up either

cheers all-

The whole reason for pinching is to DISPLACE the fat, not gather it up to inject into. Inject into the crease, not the lump.

Best way is IM spot injections. I do both tho...

cool, so then you agree with the advice given by my friend who told me the most effective way is in the "void" of loose skin between the fat & muscle?

i appreciate the input- anyone else have thoughts on the most effective way to inject gh for optimal fat loss?

anyone else? thoughts? experiences?

Originally Posted by bateman

anyone else? thoughts? experiences?

never once thought subq translated into "inject into fat"
Always thought it meant lay the peptide on TOP of the muscle

Personally, "the good ones" are when I can feel the cold on my abs..

I thought that was obvious (that you want to inject UNDER the fat). IM would probably be a quicker way to release the GH. The pharmacokinetics of IM administration usually entails a quicker onset compared to subcutaneous.

Check this article out.

CLINICAL STUDY

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GH: dependence on route and dosage of administration

no link?

Bump??